Authors Guild appeals ruling in Google Books case

Dec 30, 2013
The Google logo is seen at the Google headquarters in Mountain View, California, September 2, 2011

The Authors Guild is appealing a US judge's decision in a long-running case that cleared legal obstacles for Google's massive book-scanning project, court documents showed Monday.

The group filed a notice of appeal in the case following a November 14 ruling by Federal Judge Denny Chin.

Arguments are to be filed at a later date with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York.

The guild vowed to appeal the case after Chin ruled that Google's project is "fair use" under copyright law because it provides vital educational and other public benefits.

The case, which dates back to 2005, centers on a Google program started in 2004 to create an electronic database of books that could be searchable by keywords.

Google has scanned more than 20 million books so far in the project. Books in the public domain—without current copyrights—are made available online to the public for free. For copyrighted books, Google offers a searchable database that displays snippets of text.

Google has long argued that its program is in compliance with and acts like a "card catalog for the digital age."

Explore further: Google hits back at rivals with futuristic HQ plan

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US judge weighs Google book copyright case

Sep 23, 2013

A federal judge Monday pointedly questioned attorneys for the Authors Guild in a long-running case on whether Google's book-scanning project violates copyright law.

Google seeks to close book in author copyright case

Jul 27, 2012

Google asked a US court Friday to put an end to a long-running lawsuit over the Internet giant's massive book-scanning project, saying the effort is "not a substitute" for books themselves.

Federal judge delays Google case pending appeal

Sep 17, 2012

(AP)—A federal appeals judge in New York has agreed to delay a court challenge to Google Inc.'s plans to create the world's largest digital library while the court considers whether authors should receive class status.

Judge refuses to delay NY case for Google appeal

Aug 29, 2012

(AP)—The federal judge presiding over challenges to Google Inc.'s plans to create the world's largest digital library has refused to delay the 7-year-old case while Google appeals his decision to grant authors class certification.

Recommended for you

Google hits back at rivals with futuristic HQ plan

Feb 27, 2015

Google unveiled plans Friday for a new campus headquarters integrating wildlife and sweeping waterways, aiming to make a big statement in Silicon Valley—which is already seeing ambitious projects from Apple ...

Ericsson sues Apple over patent violations

Feb 27, 2015

Swedish telecoms group Ericsson announced Friday a lawsuit against Apple claiming that the US tech giant continued to use its technology in iPhones and other wireless devices after refusing to renew a licencing ...

Stock market shrugs off net neutrality vote

Feb 27, 2015

(AP)—The stock market largely shrugged off the Federal Communications Commission's vote to impose tougher rules on broadband providers like Comcast, Verizon and AT&T to prevent them from creating paid fast lanes for the ...

Judge orders suspension of WhatsApp in Brazil

Feb 26, 2015

(AP)—A judge says he has ordered the suspension of the globally popular instant messaging system WhatsApp across Brazil because it has allegedly failed to help in an investigation.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Protoplasmix
not rated yet Dec 31, 2013
There should be no barriers or obstacles to education. Because (fear) + (ignorance) --> (war) + (poverty)
Returners
1 / 5 (1) Dec 31, 2013
There should be no barriers or obstacles to education. Because (fear) + (ignorance) --> (war) + (poverty)


People own the rights to their own creations. Google's project can potentially rob the original author's of their due income. In this case, they are not only failing to obtain consent to use copyright material, but they are going a step further and using it anyway, when the copyright owner has already told them not to. That should be illegal, if it isn't already.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.