ACLU will appeal NY NSA phone surveillance ruling

December 27, 2013 by Larry Neumeister

A civil rights lawyer says the American Civil Liberties Union is very disappointed that a New York judge has found that a government program that collects millions of Americans' telephone records is legal.

Attorney Brett Max Kaufman said the ACLU will appeal Friday's ruling by federal Judge William Pauley in Manhattan. The judge concluded that the program was legal and a valuable part of the nation's efforts to combat the threat of terrorism. The judge said the phone collection program only works because it collects everything.

Kaufman said he hopes a in New York agrees with the reasoning of a Washington D.C. who concluded earlier this month that the program likely violates the Constitution.

Explore further: NY Facebook plaintiff seeks halt to criminal case

Related Stories

Judge says NSA program is likely unconstitutional

December 16, 2013

In the first ruling of its kind, a federal judge declared Monday that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of Americans' telephone records is likely to violate the U.S. Constitution's ban on unreasonable search. ...

Judge's word on NSA program won't be the last

December 17, 2013

A federal judge is making headlines by declaring that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' telephone records is likely unconstitutional. But even he realizes his won't be the last word ...

AT&T says it will publish reports on data requests (Update 2)

December 19, 2013

AT&T Inc. says it will publish reports on the number of requests for customer information that it receives from law enforcement agencies, the latest move in the telecommunications industry toward fuller disclosure amid debate ...

Recommended for you

Netherlands bank customers can get vocal on payments

August 1, 2015

Are some people fed up with remembering and using passwords and PINs to make it though the day? Those who have had enough would prefer to do without them. For mobile tasks that involve banking, though, it is obvious that ...

Power grid forecasting tool reduces costly errors

July 30, 2015

Accurately forecasting future electricity needs is tricky, with sudden weather changes and other variables impacting projections minute by minute. Errors can have grave repercussions, from blackouts to high market costs. ...

Microsoft describes hard-to-mimic authentication gesture

August 1, 2015

Photos. Messages. Bank account codes. And so much more—sit on a person's mobile device, and the question is, how to secure them without having to depend on lengthy password codes of letters and numbers. Vendors promoting ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Returners
1 / 5 (1) Dec 28, 2013
It doesn't violate the constitution.

The congress has the power to do this and more.

The Federal Government has specific power to not only do this, but regulate all Radio communications, which is why they are the ones who establish who uses what channels. Therefore the Supreme Court will find legal precedent favors the Federal Government regardless of how you view the circumstances.

If they want to, they can ban the use of cell phones outright, or redistribute the rights to different channels to different companies, and fine anyone who violates the new law. They just can't break prior contracts or patents, and can't make an Ex Post Facto law, which simply means they can't punish you for prior "breaks" of a law that didn't exist at the time. However, they can enforce such new law, upon reasonable time for companies to adjust, to the extent of confiscation and imprisonment, the same as any other law.

You don't have as many "rights" as you wrongfully believe you have, nor should you.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.