ACLU will appeal NY NSA phone surveillance ruling

Dec 27, 2013 by Larry Neumeister

A civil rights lawyer says the American Civil Liberties Union is very disappointed that a New York judge has found that a government program that collects millions of Americans' telephone records is legal.

Attorney Brett Max Kaufman said the ACLU will appeal Friday's ruling by federal Judge William Pauley in Manhattan. The judge concluded that the program was legal and a valuable part of the nation's efforts to combat the threat of terrorism. The judge said the phone collection program only works because it collects everything.

Kaufman said he hopes a in New York agrees with the reasoning of a Washington D.C. who concluded earlier this month that the program likely violates the Constitution.

Explore further: Judge's word on NSA program won't be the last

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Judge's word on NSA program won't be the last

Dec 17, 2013

A federal judge is making headlines by declaring that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' telephone records is likely unconstitutional. But even he realizes his won't be the last word on the issue. ...

Judge says NSA program is likely unconstitutional

Dec 16, 2013

In the first ruling of its kind, a federal judge declared Monday that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of Americans' telephone records is likely to violate the U.S. Constitution's ban on unreasonable ...

AT&T says it will publish reports on data requests (Update 2)

Dec 19, 2013

AT&T Inc. says it will publish reports on the number of requests for customer information that it receives from law enforcement agencies, the latest move in the telecommunications industry toward fuller disclosure amid debate ...

Recommended for you

Godzilla stomps back in ultra HD, wires intact

Aug 27, 2014

At a humble Tokyo laboratory, Godzilla, including the 1954 black-and-white original, is stomping back with a digital makeover that delivers four times the image quality of high definition.

Overly polite drivers, not roadworks, cause traffic jams

Aug 25, 2014

British motorists who are too polite or timid in their driving style are the cause of lengthy traffic jams across the UK, particularly when faced with roadworks or lane closures, according to a leading Heriot-Watt ...

Voice, image give clues in hunt for Foley's killer

Aug 21, 2014

Police and intelligence services are using image analysis and voice-recognition software, studying social media postings and seeking human tips as they scramble to identify the militant recorded on a video ...

Smartphone-loss anxiety disorder

Aug 21, 2014

The smart phone has changed our behavior, sometimes for the better as we are now able to connect and engage with many more people than ever before, sometimes for the worse in that we may have become over-reliant on the connectivity ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Returners
1 / 5 (1) Dec 28, 2013
It doesn't violate the constitution.

The congress has the power to do this and more.

The Federal Government has specific power to not only do this, but regulate all Radio communications, which is why they are the ones who establish who uses what channels. Therefore the Supreme Court will find legal precedent favors the Federal Government regardless of how you view the circumstances.

If they want to, they can ban the use of cell phones outright, or redistribute the rights to different channels to different companies, and fine anyone who violates the new law. They just can't break prior contracts or patents, and can't make an Ex Post Facto law, which simply means they can't punish you for prior "breaks" of a law that didn't exist at the time. However, they can enforce such new law, upon reasonable time for companies to adjust, to the extent of confiscation and imprisonment, the same as any other law.

You don't have as many "rights" as you wrongfully believe you have, nor should you.