Role of natural aerosols in climate uncertainties underestimated

Nov 06, 2013
Credit: NASA

Natural aerosols, such as emissions from volcanoes or plants, may contribute more uncertainty than previously thought to estimates of how the climate might respond to greenhouse gas emissions.

An international team of researchers, led by the University of Leeds, has shown that the effect of aerosols on the since industrialisation depends strongly on what the atmosphere was like before pollution – when aerosols were produced only from . The research will be published in the journal Nature on 7 November.

Professor Ken Carslaw, from the School of Earth and Environment at the University of Leeds and lead author of the study, said: "We have shown that our poor knowledge of aerosols prior to the industrial revolution dominates the uncertainty in how aerosols have affected clouds and climate.

"In order to better understand , we need to turn our attention towards understanding very clean regions of the atmosphere – as might have existed in the mid-1700s. Such regions are incredibly rare now, but we are looking for them."

Aerosols tend to increase the brightness of clouds, which would increase the reflection of solar radiation to space, thereby partially masking the climate-warming effects of greenhouse . Firmly establishing the effect of aerosol-induced changes on cloud brightness is an important challenge for climate scientists.

In an assessment of 28 factors that could affect the uncertainties in cloud brightness, the researchers found that 45% of the variance comes from natural aerosols, compared with 34% for human-generated . (Aerosol processes, such as how quickly they are removed from the atmosphere, account for the remaining uncertainty.)

"Our results provide a clear path for scientists to reduce the uncertainty in aerosol effects on climate because we have been able to rank the causes for the uncertainty," concludes Professor Carslaw.

Explore further: NASA satellites measure increase of Sun's energy absorbed in the Arctic

More information: The study, 'Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing', will be published in the journal Nature on 7 November 2013. dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12674

Related Stories

Anthropogenic aerosols increasing over India

Nov 05, 2013

Aerosol particles in the Earth's atmosphere scatter and absorb light differently at different wavelengths, thereby affecting the amount of incoming sunlight that reaches the planet's surface and the amount of heat that escapes, ...

The brass ring of climate modeling

Aug 05, 2013

Finding a simple way to express complex climate processes is the ultimate prize. Scientists at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, University of Leeds, Colorado State University, the National Aeronautics ...

Recommended for you

Improving forecasts for rain-on-snow flooding

4 hours ago

Many of the worst West Coast winter floods pack a double punch. Heavy rains and melting snow wash down the mountains together to breach riverbanks, wash out roads and flood buildings.

The Greenland Ice Sheet: Now in HD

5 hours ago

The Greenland Ice Sheet is ready for its close-up. The highest-resolution satellite images ever taken of that region are making their debut. And while each individual pixel represents only one moment in time, ...

NOAA/NASA satellite sees holiday lights brighten cities

23 hours ago

Even from space, holidays shine bright. With a new look at daily data from the NOAA/NASA Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (Suomi NPP) satellite, a NASA scientist and colleagues have identified how ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

VendicarE
3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 06, 2013
Any reduction in uncertainty is certainly good news.

The Climate models, which are now very good, just continue to get more and more precise.

Excellent.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (14) Nov 07, 2013
What? Didn't False "Profit" Gore bray that the "Science is settled"
VendicarE
5 / 5 (2) Nov 07, 2013
The science is settled, tardieboy. What is left is dotting the i's and crossing the t's.

The scientific discussion is over minutia of ever decreasing magnitude.

All First order effects have been quantified for a long time. Second order effects are now almost entirely quantified, and third order effects are partially quantified.

Poor Anti-Gore-Tard. He is too stupid to even begin to comprehend the depth of his own ignorance.
goracle
1 / 5 (5) Nov 27, 2013
The science is settled, tardieboy. What is left is dotting the i's and crossing the t's.

The scientific discussion is over minutia of ever decreasing magnitude.

All First order effects have been quantified for a long time. Second order effects are now almost entirely quantified, and third order effects are partially quantified.

Poor Anti-Gore-Tard. He is too stupid to even begin to comprehend the depth of his own ignorance.

In his defence, it's hard to see or hear clearly from where his head is at.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.