Gratitude or guilt? People spend more when they 'pay it forward'

November 26, 2013 by Yasmin Anwar
Gratitude or guilt? People spend more when they 'pay it forward'
Whether out of guilt, gratitude or pure generosity, study finds that consumers spend more when they ‘pay-it-forward’ than when they pay what they want Credit: iStockphoto

As shoppers across the nation prepare to pounce on Black Friday sales, researchers at UC Berkeley are looking at what happens to commerce when there's no set price tag. In an exhaustive study of consumer behavior, they found that shoppers spend more money when engaged in a chain of goodwill known as "Pay-it-forward" than when they can name their own price.

"It's assumed that are selfish and always looking for the best deal, but when we gave people the option to pay for someone else, they always paid more than what they paid for themselves," said the study's lead author, Minah Jung, a doctoral student at the Haas School of Business and a Gratitude Dissertation Fellow at UC Berkeley's Greater Good Science Center.

The results shed new light on the psychological and social forces – such as fairness, obligation, and reciprocity – that guide consumer decisions beyond getting the best deal. For example, the study found that people typically overestimate the financial generosity of others, until they learn what others have actually paid.

"People don't want to look cheap. They want to be fair, but they also want to fit in with the social norms," said Jung, whose findings have been presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, and the Association for Consumer Research, among other conferences, and are being submitted for publication.

Pay-it-forward is a pricing scheme in which patrons are told that a previous customer has paid for them. The new customer then gets the opportunity to pay for someone else. Such random acts of kindness have been reported at toll bridges, coffee shops and drive-thru restaurants, and they drive the business of Berkeley's Karma Kitchen.

Alternately, "Pay-what-you-want" is an economically similar approach in which the consumers have the option to pay any price they want. It's used by such profitable companies as video game distributor Humble Bundle.

In eight separate experiments, Jung and fellow researchers at UC Berkeley and UC San Diego compared how more than 2,400 individuals responded to these two elective pricing models at such venues as San Francisco's Cartoon Art Museum, the farmers market at Oakland's Jack London Square and in laboratory settings. At the museum and at the farmers market, consumers consistently paid more for another customer than for themselves when purchasing a cup of coffee or the price of admission.

The same dynamic occurred in lab settings in which UC Berkeley students were given coffee mugs sporting the Cal logo. While some were given the choice to pay what they wished for the mug, others were told someone else had paid for the mug and that they could pay for someone else's mug. Again, those who paid it forward spent more. In a twist, however, students who were told exactly what the previous person paid adjusted their expense accordingly by paying the same amount or a little less.

The researchers also tested the hypothesis that participants under the pay-it-forward scenario might be influenced to pay more if they become acquainted with the person who had previously covered their cost. However, they found no difference in the amount students shelled out, even after meeting their potential benefactor.

That said, researchers found that participants gave more when they could write a message or the amount they had paid on a note to the recipient. Moreover, at Berkeley's Karma Kitchen, where there are no prices on the menu because meals are paid forward by prior customers, diners were handed one of two cards after their meal. One emphasized the gift of giving, and the other of receiving. Those who were reminded of the principle of giving ultimately shelled out more.

"The results suggest that businesses that rely entirely on consumers' social preferences can survive and even thrive," Jung said. "It's pretty amazing."

Explore further: Pay-what-you-want choices appear to be linked to self image

Related Stories

Pay-what-you-want choices appear to be linked to self image

April 24, 2012

( -- Panera, the national restaurant chain most famous for its bread, has been in the news of late because they’ve decided to test the concept of allowing customers to pay whatever they want for bread, sandwiches ...

Greed, not generosity, more likely to be 'paid forward'

December 17, 2012

Paying it forward - a popular expression for extending generosity to others after someone has been generous to you - is a heartwarming concept, but it is less common than repaying greed with greed, according to new research ...

Swiss reject plan to cap managers' pay

November 24, 2013

Swiss voters soundly rejected on Sunday a proposal to limit the pay of companies' highest-paid managers to 12 times that of their lowest-paid workers, a plan that business leaders had warned could weaken the prosperous nation's ...

Memo to big box retailers: Goodwill has a shelf life

November 26, 2013

Big box retailers may have had the secret to combatting online retailers all along: instant gratification. A new study from Columbia Business School that is published in the Journal of Consumer Research warns that the positive ...

Recommended for you

An inflexible diet led to the disappearance of the cave bear

August 23, 2016

Senckenberg scientists have studied the feeding habits of the extinct cave bear. Based on the isotope composition in the collagen of the bears' bones, they were able to show that the large mammals subsisted on a purely vegan ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.