Forests buffer the effects of climate change on plants

Nov 20, 2013

Collaborative research involving scientists from Trinity College Dublin has shown that forests are able to limit the effect of climate change on the plants in their communities, such that different species are favoured in these habitats rather than in more open areas.

The work, recently published in the leading international journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, should have implications for conservation efforts. Trinity scientists Associate Professor and Head of Botany, Daniel Kelly, Professor in Quaternary Ecology, Fraser Mitchell, and Researcher, Miles Newman, worked with others in Europe and the US in the extensive collaborative project.

They compiled more than 1400 vegetation surveys from European and North American ancient deciduous forests, which comprise trees that lose their leaves with the seasons. These historical records showed that 'warm-adapted' species, such as common ivy, have become considerably more common than they were 35 years ago, but under the canopy cooler temperatures are limiting their spread. The scientists behind the discovery recommend preserving forests as safe refuges for 'cold-adapted' plants that are struggling in a warmer world.

Forest management practices have changed considerably since World War II, and many temperate forests have become denser. However, due to increasing demands for wood, among other reasons, forests are being harvested and tree canopies opened up. This scenario could see the warm-adapted plant species spread their ranges even further.

The Trinity collaborators warn that this could have real implications for plant diversity in Ireland. Professor Mitchell said: "It is interesting to note that the Irish data contributed to this international investigation provide the strongest support for the overall conclusion that dense forest canopies dampened the impact of global warming.

"This implies that the flora in Irish woodland is most vulnerable to the impacts of global warming if the tree canopy cover is not maintained. The principal threat to maintaining canopy cover is the inability of trees to regenerate due to high grazing pressure and this has been identified as a significant issue in woodland across the state."

Researcher Miles Newman added: "If mature canopy cover is not maintained or promoted, we are likely to lose cold-adapted woodland in the future. One of the greatest threats to tree canopy regeneration in Ireland is high levels of deer grazing in woodland areas."

The United Nations recently published a climate report that again confirmed the warming of global climate, which has many effects on plants and animals. In the Alps, for example, many species are found living considerably higher in the mountains than they were a few decades ago, because rising temperatures have enabled them to spread into previously inaccessible environments. This same pattern is also seen in lowland forests.

Explore further: Wytham Woods 'shields local plants'

More information: "Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming." Pieter De Frenne, Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez, David Anthony Coomes, Lander Baeten, Gorik Verstraeten, Mark Vellend, Markus Bernhardt-Römermann, Carissa D. Brown, Jörg Brunet, Johnny Cornelis, et al. PNAS 2013 110 (46) 18561-18565; published ahead of print October 28, 2013. www.pnas.org/content/110/46/18561.full.pdf+html

Related Stories

Wytham Woods 'shields local plants'

Oct 31, 2013

A recent study has found that forests with dense canopies, including Oxford's Wytham Woods, can partially shield ground-level plants from the local effects of global warming.

Rainforest carbon recovers faster than biodiversity

Nov 18, 2013

When tropical forests are cleared, they can take a century or more to re-absorb the carbon they once held, according to a new study. But their biodiversity is even slower to recover, and some species may ...

Climate change may speed up forests' life cycles

Sep 11, 2013

Many climate studies have predicted that tree species will respond to global warming by migrating via seed dispersal to cooler climates. But a new study of 65 different species in 31 eastern states finds evidence of a different, ...

Recommended for you

Climate: Meat turns up the heat

18 hours ago

Eating meat contributes to climate change, due to greenhouse gasses emitted by livestock. New research finds that livestock emissions are on the rise and that beef cattle are responsible for far more greenhouse gas emissions ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Frilla_Poo
2.7 / 5 (3) Nov 20, 2013
So. Let me see if I understand this.

The plants that prefer the shade which forests provide still favor the forests that provide the shade that the plants prefer.

This was totally unexpected. I am glad to find out they have researched this.

I feel a lot more like I do now than I did before.

Solidproof_Layman
3 / 5 (4) Nov 20, 2013
This is no coincidence. We can be grateful that the expected persistence of the blatantly obvious continues to often offer a unique level of comfort during uncertain times.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (2) Nov 20, 2013
That's interesting, two people commenting of which neither understands the gist of the article.

Mayhaps one should try reading the article all the way through. One could then reference the actual paper for some further enlightenment.

Childlike criticism might then take on some substance.

Frilla_Poo
4.3 / 5 (3) Nov 20, 2013
@ Maggnus

Excellent comment evaluation! It would seem that I neither read, nor comprehended the article, not to mention the research which is available as a PDF at a free download link here:

http://www.pnas.o...90SI.pdf

Nope. Did not read the 13 pages, nor view Figs. S1 thru S4, nor study tables S1 thru S5.

Did not look at the chart of previous study locations, the two nearest to me being:

#25 (1977-1978) located S38°02'34"E, 214.63 miles away from my house,
nor
#26 (1991) N 78°42'15" E, 336.01 miles from my location.

Oh crap, I just gave away my location. Please don't triangulate me using Table S1 (pg 8) columns 2 and 3. Man really... don't.
Solidproof_Layman
5 / 5 (3) Nov 20, 2013
Good call Maggnus. Didn't read it either. If I had I would have commented on the

"Sensitivity analyses of the effects of forest canopy cover changes on the mean thermophilization" shown in the study.

Never even seen data like:

(A) Gauss response curves
(B) GAM response curves
(C) Annual climatic variables
(D) 3,000-km buffer
(E) 20% sp. randomly removed
(F) Forest cover change per decade
(see Table S5)

Whoops! I thought I said I didn't see that.

Actually, check your PM Inbox later for a better explanation.

Seriously.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (2) Nov 20, 2013
A three for originality and making me smile!

So if you read the whole thing, how do you explain your flippant remark? Its a little more involved than just noting the plants that like the shade of forests do well in shaded forests.