Telling consumers about 'green' credentials can backfire

Oct 16, 2013

S.C. Johnson & Son, maker of household products such as Windex, Pledge and Ziploc, is viewed as one of the more environmentally responsible companies in the U.S.

So it was surprising to some when the Racine, Wisc.-based company faced multiple lawsuits for its patented Greenlist label and methodology. How did a company that was lauded as visionary years ago for voluntarily removing chlorofluorocarbons from aerosol cans wind up being accused of greenwashing?

Andrew Hoffman, a University of Michigan Ross School professor, wrote in the case study, "SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash," that the company's experience underscores the wider problem of communicating green credentials to consumers.

"The key lesson here is, be very careful when marketing green," said Hoffman, director of the Erb Institute for Global Sustainable Enterprise."When you use that message, you are marketing virtue, and virtue is in the eye of the beholder. S.C. Johnson is very progressive in terms of environmental responsibility, yet they got hit by this."

The case is part of a growing portfolio of sustainability-oriented teaching cases being developed by the Erb Institute in collaboration with GlobaLens, the case publishing division of the William Davidson Institute at the Ross School.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

S.C. Johnson developed Greenlist as an internal process to widen its use of green chemistry. It rated ingredients based on environmental and human health impacts. The process was developed with input from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Forum for the Future and others. Consulting firm Five Winds International later became the third-party administrator for Greenlist.

The label on products such as Windex stated, "Greenlist Ingredients. Same Great Product!" The other side briefly described how the rating promoted environmentally responsible ingredients and directed people to the website for more information.

Though Greenlist lessened the environmental impact of many of the company's products, lawsuits started piling up from people who felt deceived by the label. The plaintiffs argued that the label misled consumers into thinking an objective third party rated the products as environmentally friendly.

"There's a difference between reality and how you communicate it," Hoffman said. "It's really tricky. You are trying to communicate something really complicated in a very simple, easy-to-use format that's trusted. You can explain it all on your website, but that's not where people buy Windex."

S.C. Johnson eventually settled the lawsuits and removed the labels, but denied greenwashing. Hoffman says it's highly unlikely the company was trying to deceive anybody. Instead, it didn't fully consider a couple of things.

First, there is green label fatigue among consumers. There are hundreds of green labels, standards or certification schemes. Second is the issue of transparency. Many consumers concluded Greenlist was an outside third party.

But that raises another question the case prompts students to ponder: Is a third-party certification the only way to go? The Greenlist process, internally, achieved the company's goals of improving the environmental performance of its . But the label, and the way it was presented, caused a problem.

It also prompts a discussion on how much emotion is involved when consumers buy green and how that can be communicated effectively.

"You'll see a beer commercial that suggests if you drink this beer, you'll have great parties at your house with beautiful people, and we just roll our eyes at that," Hoffman says. "But when a company is pitching green, it's pitching virtue. That's connected with personal values, and people get angry if they feel they've been manipulated in on that level."

Explore further: Do consumers think products are better when companies donate to charity?

More information:

Related Stories

Critical consumers do often buy genetically modified food

Oct 15, 2013

Many people disapprove of genetically modified food. You would therefore expect them to avoid these products in supermarkets. Dutch researchers at TU Delft have revealed that by no means all European consumers ...

NIH launches Dietary Supplement Label Database

Jun 18, 2013

Researchers, as well as health care providers and consumers, can now see the ingredients listed on the labels of about 17,000 dietary supplements by looking them up on a website. The Dietary Supplement Label ...

Study raises red flag over 'green' claims

Oct 26, 2010

More than 95 percent of consumer products marketed as "green," including all toys surveyed, make misleading or inaccurate claims, says a report Tuesday.

Recommended for you

Do government technology investments pay off?

Mar 30, 2015

Studies confirm that IT investments in companies improve productivity and efficiency. University of Michigan professor M.S. Krishnan wondered if the same was true for government.

Study finds assisted housing works, but it could be improved

Mar 30, 2015

Two researchers from the University of Kansas Department of Urban Planning have just completed a study on the locations of assisted housing units and assisted households across the nation. It examines one of the key issues ...

Economist probes the high cost of health care

Mar 27, 2015

When Zack Cooper arrived at Yale as assistant professor of public health and economics, he gained access to a first-of-its-kind dataset. Working with the non-profit Health Care Cost Institute, Cooper and ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.