Our living planet: Earth's 'carbon dioxide breathing' seen from space

Sep 04, 2013
Time series of atmospheric carbon dioxide over the northern hemisphere retrieved from the Sciamachy instrument on Envisat and the TANSO instrument on Japan’s GOSAT.  While carbon dioxide increases over the ten-year period, it experiences annual fluctuations caused by vegetation’s absorption and release of the gas due to photosynthesis and respiration. The different colours represent different methods of extracting carbon dioxide measurements from the measured spectra of reflected solar radiation. Credit: University Bremen/ESA

(Phys.org) —Ten years of satellite observations of greenhouse gases reveal that carbon dioxide in our atmosphere continues to increase despite international efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Satellites also show that recent methane increases are likely due to manmade emissions.

Atmospheric carbon dioxide and methane are the two most important manmade responsible for global warming.

Measurements from ESA's Envisat mission and Japan's Greenhouse gases Observing Satellite, GOSAT, show that carbon dioxide increased by about 0.5% every year between 2003 and 2013. After years of stability, methane began increasing by 0.3–0.5% per year from 2007 on.

The main reason for the increase in carbon dioxide over the last ten years is emissions from , such as coal, oil and gas.

For methane the reason is less clear, but is most likely due to increasing manmade emissions, combined with natural variations caused by wetland emissions and biomass burning.

In addition to the increase in greenhouse gases, the satellites also show many other features such as the gases' detailed geographical pattern and fluctuations with time.

For carbon dioxide, seasonal fluctuations are the largest, caused by variations in the of vegetation. The observed 'breathing' is largest in northern mid to . This is expected since there the carbon exchange between the atmosphere and vegetation is particularly large, with forests sequestering carbon during the summer ('inhaling'), part of which is released during winter ('exhaling').

Animation of atmospheric methane from the Sciamachy instrument on Envisat (2002–12) and the TANSO instrument on Japan’s GOSAT (2009–12). Over time, methane levels gradually increase from shades of blue and green (representing lower levels) to shades of yellow and red (higher levels). Methane is expressed in parts per billion (ppb). Credit: University Bremen/ESA

"Some carbon dioxide models tend to underestimate the strength of the 'breathing', but we have to investigate this further using different models and methods," said Dr Michael Buchwitz from Germany's University of Bremen.

Dr Buchwitz is the Science Leader of the GHG-CCI project under ESA's Climate Change Initiative.

"The goal of the GHG-CCI project is to generate high-quality global distributions of and methane, yielding improved information about the regional sources and sinks of these two important climate relevant gases. This is needed to improve climate predictions," he said.

Although the satellite maps reveal regions where methane levels are particularly high, quantifying emissions requires sophisticated model-based methods because atmospheric transport – like wind – needs to be taken into consideration.

Animation of atmospheric carbon dioxide from the Sciamachy instrument on Envisat (2002–12) and the TANSO instrument on Japan’s GOSAT (2009–12). Over time, carbon dioxide levels gradually increase from shades of blue (representing lower levels) to shades of red (higher levels). Carbon dioxide is expressed in parts per million (ppm). Credit: University Bremen/ESA

"The satellite data enable us to obtain detailed spatial patterns of methane emissions globally, which cannot be derived from the sparse surface observations, although these measurements are much more accurate," said Dr Peter Bergamaschi, a scientist from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre in Ispra, Italy.

Understanding both the natural and manmade influences on atmospheric gases is the key scientific challenge.

"Continuity is a key requirement in this area, and I hope that the possible carbon dioxide data gap between GOSAT and the candidate CarbonSat mission can be closed by NASA's OCO-2 mission and the planned GOSAT-2," said Dr Buchwitz.

The latest results from all projects under ESA's Climate Change Initiative will be presented at next week's Living Planet Symposium.

Explore further: Beetles modify emissions of greenhouse gases from cow pats

More information: www.livingplanet2013.org/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Breaking down the impact of greenhouse gases

Oct 23, 2012

It's called the global warming potential or GWP for short and it bundles together the importance of carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases on future climate change.  Researchers from DOE's Pacific ...

Recommended for you

EU sets new energy savings target at 30%

5 hours ago

After months of tough negotiations, the European Commission recommended Wednesday a new energy savings target of 30 percent so as to combat climate change and ensure self-sufficiency.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Benni
1.4 / 5 (10) Sep 04, 2013
For methane the reason is less clear, but is most likely due to increasing manmade emissions, combined with natural variations caused by wetland emissions and biomass burning.


Copied above from the article: However, natural gas is mostly methane. We consume methane to create CO2. How then are manmade emissions creating methane?
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (3) Sep 04, 2013
- Combustion is never 100% effective. You always emit some of the 'raw' fuel in the end.

- Any methane production will not be 100% airtight (whether from biological material or pumped fom wells).

- Fracking does seem to relase a large amount of formerly trapped methane via alternate routes (the infamous burning water taps).

- Large cow herds (which are arguably man-made) produce a lot of methane.

- Another possible source could be the ocean-bottom methane hydrate that is starting to melt due to the warming of the oceans. (If that is so then it would constitute a buffer system that could account for the current lag in temperature increase...and would constitute an enormous problem because this is something that we cannot fix, as the scope of this would be way, way, WAY beyond our capabilities to influence)