iPhone hack shows security isn't at our fingertips just yet

September 24, 2013 by Eerke Boiten, The Conversation
Finger or falsie? It’s too hard to tell. Credit: hawaii

We've come to expect something radically different from Apple every time it launches a new product and sure enough, the fingerprint sensor unveiled as part of the iPhone 5s, seemed like a revolution in phone security.

But almost as soon as the technology was announced, fans and foes set about trying to crack the fingerprint system. Sure enough, a group in Germany now claims to have succeeded, just days after the new iPhone became available.

From the first announcement by Apple, the commentary suggested forging of might be an issue. It looks like the German Chaos Computer Club has achieved this security breach for the Touch ID sensor. The group claims to have created a fake finger using just a fingerprint left on glass. It says the hack proves that is not a suitable method for controlling access to mobile phones.

The club's technique may not have been as simple and low-tech as the legendary gummibear attack by Matsumoto, but it still looks relatively easy. There also appears to be a between the claims made by the CCC and Apple's assertion that the technology uses "sub-epidermal" scanning, which would distinguish live fingers from fakes, but the claim from the CCC is nevertheless credible.

Apple's underlying motivation for offering fingerprint locking was good: people too often do not bother to lock their phones, password-based security drives users up the wall and is increasingly at risk from brute force cracking.

There is little doubt that multi-factor authentication is the future. This involves double protection using something you know, like a password, as well as something you have, like a phone, or something you are. This last category relies heavily on a long history of biometrics research, recording characteristics of voice, eyes, writing and fingerprints.

Like any biometric technology, fingerprint sensors must have a high degree of precision. This characterises the quality of the compromise between "false negatives" (failing to recognise someone) and "false positives" (recognising the wrong person). For individual consumers, the first is a frustrating usability issue – the second is a much less visible security problem.

The technology in the iPhone's Touch ID feature is said to be highly advanced. With the profits the company makes and the amount it can spend on research, Apple could well have achieved a breakthrough in fingerprinting sensor precision.

The promotional video for the new phone shows an awareness of the potential security problems related to losing fingerprint data. It was quick to announce that the information would only be stored in an encrypted form, and only in a secure area on the phone chip itself.

The revelations made so far about the extent to which the NSA is able to spy on consumers do not actually suggest that Apple has given the NSA full access to its iPhones, so we may still be safe when using our iPhones. Conscious that security issues are at the forefront of its customers' minds these days, Apple promised it will not allow third party applications access to Touch ID. This suggests it has learned from the privacy issues raised by its careless leaking of location and contact information. However, it does restrict the introduction of potentially improved authentication facilities.

The CCC breach is not necessarily a reason for people to junk their brand new iPhones – no more so than other problems found such as ways of circumventing lock screens. The new security feature certainly looks more user-friendly than using a pincode. Of the 50% of people who do not use any phone security right now, some may take this up, and that is a step forward. For critical operations such as iStore purchases, Apple customers will still use a password in addition to the fingerprint, so is at least not reduced in that sense.

In the longer term, there is no doubt that passwords by themselves will become a thing of the past. A breakthrough in usable and secure multi-factor authentication would have been very welcome. As it turns out, the Apple Touch ID isn't it.

Explore further: Review: Slick iOS 7 shines on Apple's new iPhones (Update)

Related Stories

Review: Slick iOS 7 shines on Apple's new iPhones (Update)

September 11, 2013

One of the best things about Apple's latest iPhones is the slick new iOS 7 software that runs the devices. But that souped-up operating system could end up hurting sales because the free software upgrade will also work on ...

iPhone 5S fingerprint scanning: Thumbs up or down?

September 13, 2013

Technology to acquire and use biometric data such as fingerprints has been around for several decades and has made its way from forensic investigation to laptop computers – and now, with this week's introduction of iPhone ...

Apple's Touch ID: Time to come to grips with a touchy subject

September 16, 2013

Apple's latest and greatest – the iPhone 5s – met a muted reception last week in San Francisco. Although the device's admittedly evolutionary-not-revolutionary updates target early adopters and high-end consumers, industry ...

Recommended for you

Toyota promises better mileage and ride with Prius hybrid

October 13, 2015

Toyota Motor Corp. released details for its fourth-generation Prius on Tuesday, promising that improvements in the battery, engine, wind resistance and weight mean better mileage for the world's top-selling hybrid car.

Facebook to test mobile app shopping tab

October 12, 2015

Facebook said Monday that it will begin testing a shopping tab for its mobile app as it works to ramp up advertising and online commerce offerings.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 25, 2013
"We've come to expect something radically different from Apple every time it launches a new product..."

I disagree strongly with this statement and contend that Apple hasn't done any significant innovation since Steve Jobs left.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.