Why humans are musical

Sep 23, 2013

Why don't apes have musical talent, while humans, parrots, small birds, elephants, whales, and bats do? Matz Larsson, senior physician at the Lung Clinic at Örebro University Hospital, attempts to answer this question in the scientific publication Animal Cognition.

In his article, he asserts that the ability to mimic and imitate things like music and speech is the result of the fact that synchronised group movement quite simply makes it possible to perceive sounds from the surroundings better.

The hypothesis is that the evolution of vocal learning, that is musical traits, is influenced by the need of a species to deal with the disturbing sounds that are created in connection with locomotion. These sounds can affect our hearing only when we move.

"When several people with legs of roughly the same length move together, we tend to unconsciously move in rhythm. When our footsteps occur simultaneously, a brief interval of silence occurs. In the middle of each stride we can hear our surroundings better. It becomes easier to hear a pursuer, and perhaps easier to conduct a conversation as well," explains Larsson.

A behaviour that has survival value tends to produce dopamine, the "reward molecule". In dangerous terrain, this could result in the stimulation of and enhanced listening to surrounding sounds in nature. If that kind of synchronized behaviour was rewarding in it may as well have been rewarding for the brain in relative safety, resulting in activities such as hand- clapping, foot-stamping and yelping around the campfire. From there it is just a short step to dance and rhythm. The hormone dopamine flows when we listen to music.

Explore further: Discovery helps to unlock brain's speech-learning mechanism

More information: Larsson, M. Self-generated sounds of locomotion and ventilation and the evolution of human rhythmic abilities, Animal Cognition, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0433-2

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Rhesus monkeys cannot hear beat in music

Dec 13, 2012

(Phys.org)—Beat induction, the ability to pick up regularity – the beat – from a varying rhythm, is not an ability that rhesus monkeys possess. These are the findings of researchers from the University ...

Recommended for you

Researchers look at small RNA pathways in maize tassels

Aug 22, 2014

Researchers at the University of Delaware and other institutions across the country have been awarded a four-year, $6.5 million National Science Foundation grant to analyze developmental events in maize anthers ...

How plant cell compartments change with cell growth

Aug 22, 2014

A research team led by Kiminori Toyooka from the RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science has developed a sophisticated microscopy technique that for the first time captures the detailed movement of ...

Plants can 'switch off' virus DNA

Aug 22, 2014

A team of virologists and plant geneticists at Wageningen UR has demonstrated that when tomato plants contain Ty-1 resistance to the important Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), parts of the virus DNA ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Sep 24, 2013
This fails to account for traditional music of some south Asian countries, such as Bali, which does not have any definable rhythm at all. Percussion instruments play with no apparent coordination.

Some traditional tribal music of the USA typically has a continuous uninterrupted tone or continuous chant.

As this is some of the most ancient musical styles known we would expect, if the hypothesis were correct, for these styles to more closely follow simple stepwise rhythm rather than be far far less like it or totally unrelated to it.

The researchers have taken popular western music, apparently ignored music from South Asia and traditional tribal music and formulated a hypothesis on the current western style. The hypothesis does not even fit traditional Sitar music (eg the Rag) of India, an ancient style predating much of western music as we know it.
RobertKarlStonjek
2.5 / 5 (2) Sep 24, 2013
Empirically identifying a source of rhythm (probably not the only one, possibly the first) and then using a grade school knowledge of music to extrapolate it to all music is unimpressive.

They should have consulted an Ethnomusicologist. That is how science is done ~ each area has its own highly trained experts. They do not need scientists from another discipline assuming that one can trivially summarise the entire field.
beleg
not rated yet Oct 03, 2013
Your first exposure to sound is noise in an Anerchoic chamber labeled the womb.
You don't get the benefit of the sound of your own heart until 18 to 25 days of gestation.

Your bearer takes up this lack of sound with their own heartbeat and voice. Additionally
your future ears take up perception and sensation only after 16 weeks.

Nevertheless all the cells involve in future hearing were still busy evolving by passing information to each other as trials runs and dress rehearsals till that 16th week grand premier.

Before you even reach the world outside of gestation you will have been subjected to an astronomical amount of isolated sounds. For example, yours and your bearers' heart beats.

There is no shortage of frequency spectrum in the thumps of hearts. The benefit of rhythm just adds to the music.
beleg
not rated yet Oct 03, 2013
The narrative above also explains Synesthesia.
If cells to signal the brain of the sensation of hearing are lacking, then the brain cells waiting to receive such signals wait. Wait for what? For the next best (stray?) signal of sensation of any other intact sense.
The existence of hearing-motion synesthesia is born.
Perhaps the author believes you must hear only with the sensation of sound.