New experimental evidence on charitable gift restrictions and donor behaviour

Sep 18, 2013

In this article, Sara Helms, Brian Scott and Jeremy Thornton report new results for an economic experiment on charitable gift restrictions and donor behaviour. The authors demonstrate that offering the option to limit a charitable gift increases the average gift size for donors who choose to restrict their gift and for those who do not. These results suggest that restricted gifts are an important tool for increasing donations and may be less costly to the nonprofit organization than originally believed.

Gift restrictions are a common tool used by donors to ensure charitable intent. Due to monitoring costs and the loss of ?exibility, gift restrictions are increasingly expensive for recipient non-profit organizations. Using an economic experiment, Helms, Scott and Thornton studied the impact of offering donors the option to restrict their charitable gift. Their primary ?nding demonstrates that allowing the option to restrict a charitable gift increases the average gift size, whether or not the chooses to exercise that option.

This result implies that restricted gifts are an important way of increasing and additionally may be less costly to the non-pro?t organizations than originally believed. Further, high levels of religious attendance are associated with an increased use of gift restrictions and an increased to those restrictions.

Explore further: Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

More information: Helms, S., Scott, B. and Thornton, J. New experimental evidence on charitable gift restrictions and donor behaviour, Applied Economics Letters, Volume 20, Issue 17, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2013.829172

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The Thought Is What Counts

Dec 22, 2009

Holiday gift givers who expect to be appreciated for choosing the most expensive gifts are likely to be disappointed when their presents are unwrapped. Cost has little impact on how much we value the gifts we receive, according ...

Recommended for you

Affirmative action elicits bias in pro-equality Caucasians

50 minutes ago

New research from Simon Fraser University's Beedie School of Business indicates that bias towards the effects of affirmative action exists in not only people opposed to it, but also in those who strongly endorse equality.

Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

20 hours ago

When asked who is going to win an election, people tend to predict their own candidate will come out on top. When that doesn't happen, according to a new study from the University of Georgia, these "surprised losers" often ...

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

Jul 23, 2014

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

User comments : 0