Earthworm invasion

Sep 12, 2013 by Joshua E. Brown
Earthworm Invasion
Three species of earthworms, from one hole in Hinesburg, Vt. UVM researchers are tracking the wriggling migration of these invaders, trying to understand how their soil-eating ways are affecting Vermont forests, and, perhaps, global stocks of carbon. Credit: Joshua Brown

Beavers reshape landscapes with their dams. Wolves control elk populations. Sea otters protect kelp forests by eating sea urchins. These are what ecologists call "keystone" species: critters that control an ecosystem and have a disproportionate impact on other species. And in Vermont forests, what are the keystone species?

Put earthworms on the list.

Kudzu vines grow madly, covering power lines. Zebra mussels muscle-out native mussels in Lake Champlain. Burmese pythons devastate local wildlife in the Everglades. These are invasive species: non-native animals and plants, carried by people into new locations, that take hold, disrupting and reshaping local ecosystems. And in Vermont forests, what are the invasive species?

Put earthworms on that list too.

There are sixteen earthworm species reported in Vermont—and none of them are native. They're all exotic—fourteen are European and two are Asian—and some are invaders, spreading silently underground. "Perhaps ten or eleven are invasive," says Josef Gorres, a professor in UVM's Department of Plant and Soil Science.

"He's an earthwormologist," says Don Ross, with a wry smile. But the research project Ross is leading is no joke. Also a professor in Plant and Soil Science, Ross, a soil chemist, wants to better understand the effects of all these earthworms on the soils of the Northern Forest. He and Gorres know the worms are upsetting —and they also think the worms have a role to play in . But what that role is—good guy or villain?—they're not sure.

Earthworm excreta

Which is why, on a gentle hillside in the Hinesburg Town Forest just off Hayden Hill Road, Ross, Gorres, three other scientists, and five students dig a hole in the ground. Surrounding them, a stand of youngish trees—paper birch, sugar maple, white ash—forms a pleasing green glow. The trees are reclaiming a farm field abandoned in the 1930s. Each tree, as it grows, sucks in carbon dioxide from the air, converting some of it into leaves and wood. In other words, a forest stores carbon from the atmosphere that would otherwise contribute to the greenhouse effect—and global warming.

But for all the carbon being stored in these trees aboveground, a roughly equal amount of carbon is stored belowground. And that's where the earthworms come in.

Graduate student Meghan Knowles holds up a clump of soil. "Most of this is earthworm poop, because this is such a highly invaded site," she says. "Most of this soil has been processed by earthworms." Then she teases apart the clump. "We're sifting through the litter to try to find earthworms and then we're going to look for middens—mounds—that are an indication of deep burrowing species," she says.

Earthworm Invasion
State of Vermont forester Sandy Wilmot (left) takes notes while UVM graduate student Meghan Knowles probes a forest earthworm plot.

On the edge of the hole, a thin layer of leaves on the top surface is visible and then an even mix of blackish-brown soil goes down into the darkness. "Look at this patch," say Gorres, "there's this leaf layer and then we're straight into the top mineral layer." Yes, Dr. Watson, worms have been here. In a forest like this without worms, there would first be a "duff layer," which is a spongy, bouncy layer above the deeper mineral soils, "and this just doesn't exist in here anymore," says Gorres. The worms have, literally, eaten it.

Carbon on balance

This efficient decomposition is why home gardeners love earthworms: they break down organic matter, releasing nutrients. But in a Vermont forest they're not so benign, since in breaking down that organic matter they redistribute carbon throughout the soil, changing the basic layering of forest floors—and the tree and understory species that depend on this system. "A lot of plants that use the duff layer as a germination medium or a seed bank will no longer be around," says Gorres.

The worms also release carbon dioxide as they eat, adding to the forest's carbon emissions. It might seem that earthworms are all villain in the drama that is the global carbon cycle. But not so fast, the UVM scientists say.

"When the earthworms first invade, they change things dramatically and there is a big carbon loss and change in the forest floor," says Don Ross, holding up three different species on his hand. As these earthworms move through the soil, they're ingesting mineral particles along with organic particles, glomming them together inside their digestive track. And "when they poop," says Knowles, "they produce what we call an aggregate."

Over time, it seems, these soil aggregates might physically protect the organic carbon inside them, forming a barrier to the microorganisms that could otherwise break it down. "So the question is," Gorres asks, over the long run, "do earthworms create a negative balance or positive balance on carbon?"

Part of this research project—sponsored by the Northeastern States Research Cooperative, and exploring eighteen forest plots across Vermont—aims to answer that question. "Earthworms create these stable aggregate structures," says Knowles who is, as her master's degree work, doing a lot of the digging and lab work to get to the bottom of this question. "And so I'm trying to quantitatively distinguish between what earthworms are creating and what is already here, to figure out if earthworms are increasing that physical protection of carbon."

Land use history

Recent studies in the Northern Forest have shown that land use changes—like agricultural abandonment or intensive tree harvesting—can dramatically change the amount of carbon stored in that land's soils. Much of the Northern Forest that was previously tilled farmland is currently gaining stored carbon. But what was the soil carbon like before European settlement? And how much does the current earthworm invasion threaten these gains? It's hard to say.

"The presumption is that the first agricultural immigrants brought earthworms with them," says historical ecologist Charlie Cogbill, one of the scientists on this project, "but we don't know where the baseline is without worms."

In any case, both Cogbill and Don Ross say, land use history had a huge effect on the current status of the forest, and also, probably, on whether an area has earthworms today. The eighteen plots the team is studying intensively have widely varying amounts of belowground carbon—and preliminary data show about half of them appear to have earthworms in them. That variability likely reflects differing land use histories. "Many of the forests here developed in the presence of earthworms, when ag land was abandoned," Gorres says. "That is likely to be quite different than a forest that has regenerated from a stand that was timber harvested and did not have any earthworms."

There are many variables of soil type, specific type and intensity of land use practice, microclimate and others that make each site different. "In Vermont and New England, the earthworm distribution is very patchy," says Gorres. "In some places, earthworms are abundant. Then step three meters in another direction, and there is a complete forest floor and no . Why is that? Nobody has really been able to answer that."

This project may not be able to answer that question either, but it does seek to broadly survey the extent of the worm invasion across Vermont—and to better understand how the interaction between earthworm activity and land use history influences the amount of carbon in the soil.

Carbon credits

This is a matter of more than scientific interest. "When we're trying to set up policies about how to increase sequestration of carbon from the air," says Sandy Wilmot, a forest scientist with the State of Vermont and a partner on this project, "it would be very helpful to know how to manage the soil as well as the aboveground." For example, differing forestry techniques clearly affect aboveground carbon storage, and are likely to also influence belowground carbon too. They may also have an effect on the likelihood of earthworm invasion.

Human-generated carbon—and its capture—is starting to develop into big business. Around the world, various types of carbon markets are emerging in the effort to slow and regulate climate change. Credits in these markets generally depend on being able to show that carbon is being sequestered out of the atmosphere—and held long-term. But belowground carbon is nearly impossible to include in these markets, or other mitigation efforts, because it's hard to measure.

"Forest soil carbon is poorly understood and so it's often not counted or even removed from some forest carbon protocols," says Cecilia Danks, a social scientist in UVM's Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources. "I've been brought in to this earthworm project to try to figure out: is there a carbon market connection? You don't get credit in the market right now—for the most part—for soil carbon." This research effort aims to move toward a better accounting of carbon in the Northern Forest, and, perhaps, Danks hopes, the chance for Vermont forestland owners to get a return on the carbon stored below their feet, even carbon passing through the bowel of an invasive earthworm.

Explore further: Digging deeper for soil carbon storage

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Global worming: Earthworms add to climate change

Feb 05, 2013

(Phys.org)—Earthworms are long revered for their beneficial role in soil fertility, but with the good comes the bad: they also increase greenhouse gas emissions from soils, according to a study published Feb. 3 in Nature Cl ...

Wood not so green a biofuel

Jun 11, 2013

Using wood for energy is considered cleaner than fossil fuels, but a Dartmouth College-led study finds that logging may release large amounts of carbon stored in deep forest soils. The results appear in the journal Global Ch ...

Digging deeper for soil carbon storage

Sep 10, 2013

Many surface soils in Western Australia are already storing as much carbon as they can, according to research at The University of Western Australia and in collaboration with the Department of Agriculture ...

Forests under threat from exotic earthworm invasion

Sep 01, 2011

It is widely acknowledged that human beings are largely responsible for the widespread alteration of ecosystems on the planet. A recent study by Dara Seidl and Peter Klepeis of Colgate University in New York traces the ways ...

Recommended for you

Seals forage at offshore wind farms

20 hours ago

By using sophisticated GPS tracking to monitor seals' every movement, researchers have shown for the first time that some individuals are repeatedly drawn to offshore wind farms and pipelines. Those man-made ...

Study provides insights into birds' migration routes

22 hours ago

By tracking hybrids between songbird species, investigators have found that migration routes are under genetic control and could be preventing interbreeding. The research, which is published in Ecology Le ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
1 / 5 (10) Sep 12, 2013
28 years of climate blame research was really just a dream come true for you lazy copy and paste news editors.

Why are you believers saying it WILL be a crisis when science has only agreed it COULD be a crisis and have NEVER said or agreed it WILL be an inevitable crisis?
Not one scientist or IPCC warning has ever said a crisis WILL happen so why won't science end this costly debate to save the planet and save their own children's lives by finally declaring that a crisis is inevitable just like they say comet hits are?

Get ahead of the curve:
*Occupywallstreet now does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded and corporate run carbon trading stock markets ruled by politicians.