Amazon asks Supreme Court to block NY sales tax

Sep 02, 2013 by Jay Greene

Amazon.com Inc. is taking its tax fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block a demand from New York authorities that it collect a sales tax on goods sold in that state.

The online hired Theodore B. Olson, former solicitor general of the U.S., to represent the company in its petition to have the case reviewed by the court.

The filing, made Friday, seeks to persuade the court to consider the of states collecting taxes from companies that don't have such physical operations as warehouses in those states.

This dispute is similar to battles Amazon has fought in other states. The company has long relied on a 1992 Supreme Court ruling that gave retailers a pass on having to collect sales in states where they don't have a . Retailers with physical locations have lobbied for years to get online retailers to collect taxes on sales, arguing that the 1992 ruling gave online competitors an unfair advantage.

New York was among the first states to try to get Amazon and other online retailers to collect taxes. The state argued that a referral program the company runs, called Amazon Associates, gives the company a presence in New York. That program offers bounties to website operators for sales of Amazon products they generate through links on their pages. The company has thousands of associates in New York.

In March, the New York Court of Appeals upheld the state law requiring the collection of by Amazon and other online retailers.

With some states that have made similar claims, Amazon has negotiated deals to collect taxes, often in exchange for to build operations in those states. In other states, Amazon has terminated the associates programs in order to avoid tax collection.

Because New York was among the earliest states to force tax collection, it is the only state that Amazon has sued. And even though Amazon is suing New York, it nevertheless collects taxes on sales there, one of 10 states where it does so.

The case will likely set a legal precedent since the ruling in the 1992 case, Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, came before Internet sales became a significant business.

In its filing, the company argues that upholding the New York state law would "significantly and unduly burden interstate commerce," and that it would provide "a road map for other jurisdictions to inflict similar burdens on interstate commerce."

The news of the filing was first reported Wednesday by the Financial Times.

In addition to litigating this case, and negotiating with some states, Amazon is also pursuing the matter in Congress.

The company is backing a bill that would create a federal law, the Marketplace Fairness Act, that would require online retailers with sales of more than $1 million to collect taxes for states in which they sold to customers.

Amazon declined to comment on the Supreme Court petition.

Explore further: Out-of-patience investors sell off Amazon

4 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NY top court OKs tax on online sellers like Amazon

Mar 28, 2013

New York's highest court has ruled the state can collect sales tax from out-of-state retailers, rejecting claims by Amazon.com and Overstock.com that the tax violates the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause.

White House backs Internet sales tax bill

Apr 22, 2013

The White House Monday backed a Senate bill to force online retailers like Amazon and eBay to collect state and local sales taxes, hoping to end a cost disadvantage hampering bricks and mortar businesses.

Amazon to cut off California-based Web affiliates

Jun 30, 2011

(AP) -- Amazon.com Inc. said Wednesday that it will stop working with online affiliates based in California since the state passed a new rule that forces online retailers to collect sales tax there.

Amazon cuts off California affiliates

Jun 30, 2011

(AP) -- Amazon.com Inc. and much smaller Overstock.com Inc. are cutting off their advertising affiliates in California because of a new state rule forcing online retailers to collect sales tax there.

Recommended for you

Out-of-patience investors sell off Amazon

Oct 24, 2014

Amazon has long acted like an ideal customer on its own website: a freewheeling big spender with no worries about balancing a checkbook. Investors confident in founder and CEO Jeff Bezos' invest-and-expand ...

States ascend into the cloud

Oct 24, 2014

Seven years ago, the state of Delaware started moving computer servers out of closets and from under workers' desks to create a consolidated data center and a virtual computing climate.

Microsoft drops Nokia name from smartphones

Oct 24, 2014

Microsoft said Friday it was dropping the Nokia name from its Lumia smartphones, rebranding following the acquisition earlier this year of the Finnish group's handset division.

Amazon's loss makes holidays a question mark

Oct 24, 2014

Amazon's trademark smile icon is becoming more of a grimace. The world's largest online retailer reported a wider third-quarter loss than analysts expected and gave a disappointing holiday forecast.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Grallen
not rated yet Sep 03, 2013
Hmm. I guess this raises the question of where, technically, a purchase made online takes place: The servers location, or the users location.

It probably should be a split the different situation, but sadly that has the most overhead.

I think that states have a right to collect taxes as they see fit from their residents or the people that want to deal with those residents. Though it's just an opinion that could change if a good argument was made.