Young or old, song sparrows experience climate change differently from each other

Aug 12, 2013
This is a nestling song sparrow, just after banding and measuring at Point Reyes National Seashore. Researchers at UC Davis are studying the song sparrows to see how and why climate change could affect a species across its ages and stages. Credit: Kristen Dybala/UC Davis

What's good for adults is not always best for the young, and vice versa. At least that is the case with song sparrows and how they experience the effects of climate change, according to two recent studies by scientists at the University of California, Davis, and Point Blue Conservation Science.

Both studies show the importance of considering the various stages and ages of individuals in a species—from babies to juveniles to adults—to best predict not only how could affect a species as a whole, but also why.

"To learn how climate change is expected to affect an individual population, you have to look at ," said lead author Kristen Dybala, a postdoctoral scholar in the UC Davis Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology. "If you don't break it down by these different stages, you get a different understanding that may be misleading, or worse, that's just wrong."

For example, in the study published in print today in the journal Global Change Biology, climate change had opposite projected effects for adult and juvenile song sparrows in central coastal California. The researchers found, not surprisingly, that adult survival was sensitive to cold winter weather.

"Even though we rarely see freezing temperatures on the coast of California, it was clear that an adult bird's chances of survival were lowest in the coldest winters," said co-author Tom Gardali, Pacific Coast and Central Valley Group director of Point Blue Conservation Science.

They expected a similar response from the young. However, warmer, drier winters translated to less food for the juvenile sparrows during the following summer.

"Before they can get to winter, the juveniles have to survive their first summer, when they're sensitive to how much food is available," said Dybala. "So as winters get warmer, we expect adults and juveniles to respond in opposite directions."

In another recent study of song sparrows published in the journal Ecology, lead author Dybala found that parents provided a buffer against the weather for baby sparrows still dependent on them for food. However, independent juveniles that were newly out on their own were more sensitive to changes in the weather because they lacked the skills and experience of their parents.

While that vulnerability has existed for as long as offspring have been leaving the nest, climate change is expected to exacerbate those already uncertain conditions, Dybala said. This sort of variation in juvenile survival can significantly impact a species' population growth.

Both studies were conducted at Point Blue's Palomarin Field Station in the Point Reyes National Seashore in California. While are found throughout North America, the local population is nonmigratory, and Point Blue (formerly PRBO Conservation Science) biologists have collected survivorship data on them for 34 years. Dybala combined that information with weather data collected at the field station to see how different weather factors influenced survival rates over the years.

The scientists said that efforts to understand or project demographic responses to climate change could be used to inform climate change adaptation plans, help prioritize future research, identify where limited conservation resources could be best spent and help soften the impacts of climate change for individual species.

Explore further: Speckled beetle key to saving crops in Ethiopia

More information: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.12228
www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/12-1443.1

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Iberian lynx threatened by climate change

Jul 21, 2013

Climate change could drive the Iberian lynx ‒ the world's most threatened cat – to extinction within 50 years, despite substantial ongoing conservation efforts, a new international study has found.

Surprise species at risk from climate change

Jun 19, 2013

(Phys.org) —Most species at greatest risk from climate change are not currently conservation priorities, according to an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) study that has introduced a ...

Recommended for you

Speckled beetle key to saving crops in Ethiopia

11 hours ago

(Phys.org) —An invasive weed poses a serious and frightening threat to farming families in Ethiopia, but scientists from a Virginia Tech-led program have unleashed a new weapon in the fight against hunger: ...

New tool to assess noise impact on marine mammals

11 hours ago

A new desktop tool which will allow offshore renewable energy developers to assess the likely impacts of their projects on marine mammal populations has been developed by scientists at the University of St ...

Of bees, mites, and viruses

Aug 21, 2014

Honeybee colonies are dying at alarming rates worldwide. A variety of factors have been proposed to explain their decline, but the exact cause—and how bees can be saved—remains unclear. An article published on August ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
1 / 5 (6) Aug 12, 2013
Climate change was a dream come true for lazy copy and paste news editors.

Believers say a crisis WILL happen while science has NEVER agreed it WILL happen, only "could" and "might" and "likely" and "potentially" and…. So why doesn't science shut down the denier machine and just say their own crisis is "inevitable" like they say comet this are? What denier would question a scientist saying "eventual" and "unavoidable"?

Science: "Climate change is real and is happening and could lead to unstoppable warming."

Prove me wrong: Science has never said anything past "could be" a crisis and it's only been 28 years of research (almost all into effects not causes of an assumed to be real crisis.

A consensus of "maybe" is a consensus of nothing and the only crisis you remaining fear mongers have to worry about is how your grand kids will explain to your great grand kids how at the grunt of a headline condemned them all to the greenhouse gas ovens of an exaggerated climate crisis.