Syngenta challenges EU's bee-saving pesticide ban

Aug 27, 2013
Bees gather nectar from lavender flowers on July 22, 2013 in Marseille, southern France. Swiss agrichemical giant Syngenta said on Tuesday it was taking the European Commission to court over its suspension of the use of an insecticide it blames for killing bees.

Swiss agrichemical giant Syngenta said on Tuesday it was taking the European Commission to court over its suspension of the use of an insecticide it blames for killing bees.

"We would prefer not to take legal action but have no other choice given our firm belief that the Commission wrongly linked thiamethoxam to the decline in bee health," Syngenta chief operating officer John Atkin said in a statement.

The company is bringing the case before the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, a spokeswoman told AFP.

The European Commission announced in May that it was temporarily banning the use of Syngenta's thiamethoxam, which is also sold under the name Cruiser. The product is used to treat seeds and is applied to the soil or sprayed on bee-attractive plants and .

It simultaneously banned two pesticides produced by Bayer of Germany, and expanded the ban last month to a fourth pesticide made by another German company, BASF.

Syngenta and the other companies have insisted their products cannot be blamed for a very sharp decline in the .

Bee numbers have slumped in Europe and the United States in recent years because of a mysterious plague dubbed (CCD), which some reports have said has resulted in a loss of more than 40 percent of across the United States.

A logo of Swiss agrochemicals group Syngenta is pictured during a press conference in London on February 7, 2008. Swiss agrichemical giant Syngenta said on Tuesday it was taking the European Commission to court over its suspension of the use of an insecticide it blames for killing bees.

This has stoked fears over future , since bees account for 80 percent of plant pollination by insects, which is vital to .

Without the work of bees, many crops would be unable to bear fruit or would have to be pollinated by hand.

But Syngenta insisted on Tuesday that it was being wrongly blamed for the problem.

"The Commission took the decision on the basis of a flawed process, an inaccurate and incomplete assessment by the European Food Safety Authority and without the full support of EU Member States," the company insisted.

The Commission's decision received support from 15 countries, including France and Germany, but eight others, including Britain, Italy and Hungary voted against the move, while four, including current EU presidency holder Ireland abstained.

Syngenta said the EU suspension was causing deep concern among farmers, who once the two-year-ban takes effect in December will need to replace "an extremely effective, low dose product (with) much less sustainable alternatives."

"Modern products like thiamethoxam are essential to address the challenge of increasing European food production and reducing the reliance on imports," Atkin said.

Instead of going after pesticide makers, Syngenta said, stakeholders should "concentrate on practical solutions to bee health, which most experts agree is damaged by disease, viruses and the loss of habitat and nutrition."

Following the news, the price of shares in the company slipped 0.43 percent to 370.20 Swiss francs in morning trading, beating the performance of the Swiss stock exchange's main index, which was down 0.87 percent.

Explore further: Dwindling wind may tip predator-prey balance

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

EU bans three pesticides harmful to bees

May 24, 2013

The European Commission said Friday that it will ban for two years beginning in December pesticides blamed for killing the bees that pollinate food and fruit crops.

Agrichemical giant Syngenta faults EU bee plans

Feb 15, 2013

Swiss-based agrichemical giant Syngenta on Friday urged Brussels to withdraw plans to restrict the use of neonicotinoid pesticides, saying blaming them for the death of bees was wrongheaded.

EU plans new bid to protect bees

Mar 19, 2013

The European Commission said Tuesday it will try again to get member states to back a two-year ban on insecticides harmful to bees whose numbers have been in sharp and worrying decline.

EU hints at insecticide ban over threat to bees

Jan 16, 2013

The European Commission hinted on Wednesday that it could ban several insecticides, some made by German chemicals giant Bayer, after scientists found disturbing evidence of harm to bees.

Recommended for you

Dwindling wind may tip predator-prey balance

11 hours ago

Bent and tossed by the wind, a field of soybean plants presents a challenge for an Asian lady beetle on the hunt for aphids. But what if the air—and the soybeans—were still?

Asian stars enlisted to fight African rhino poaching

21 hours ago

Increasingly desperate South African conversationists are turning to a multi-national team of "rhino ambassadors" to try to end the scourge of poaching—and Vietnamese pop diva Hong Nhung has been recruited ...

Tropical fish a threat to Mediterranean Sea ecosystems

Sep 18, 2014

The tropical rabbitfish which have devastated algal forests in the eastern Mediterranean Sea pose a major threat to the entire Mediterranean basin if their distribution continues to expand as the climate ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Kev_C
5 / 5 (1) Aug 27, 2013
They should accept the legal position of the EU or cease to operate within the EU. That is the choice of all corporations. They had their chance to challenge the evidence but whatever challenge they made was obviously flawed otherwise the EU would not have imposed a ban. The EU commission enforced a ban to protect the bees because they were seriously affected by this insecticide. Insecticides kill insects-bees are insects. Where is the problem with understanding that link? Unless Syngenta can emphatically prove their products are safe for use near bee populations, and that includes wild bees, bumblebees and other pollinator species of insects, then they should adhere to the precautionary principle in full. The same should be applied to Bayer as well.
VendicarE
1 / 5 (1) Aug 27, 2013
Corporations always put their own financial interest ahead of the welfare of humanity.

Corporations are have no regard for ethics, morality, or even their own long term survival.

They are Kleptomaniacal, in ideology, Fascist in policy, Psychopaths in terms of ethics and morality, and narcissistic in terms of advertising.

Corporations are the enemy.

Never forget that.