Irrigation's impact on clouds and climate

Aug 05, 2013
Crop irrigation is one of the largest ways humans perturb the climate. Including irrigation in model calculations will help bring model estimates closer to a complete representation of the climate.

With the simple act of watering a plant, humans alter the balance of moisture in soil and the climate. Atmospheric scientists at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory included irrigation in a climate model and found that it shifts the balance of water vapor and upward moving air. This impact, seen in dry years especially, affects the layer of air closest to Earth, which is most susceptible to heat exchange and evaporation from the Earth's surface. Their findings show that irrigation may play a role in forming shallow clouds, which alter the local climate. Including irrigation in climate models brings the models another step closer to observations.

In many parts of the world, is necessary to successfully grow crops used for food and other human and animal benefits. Though irrigation is one of the major human practices that alters the Earth, it is not often accounted for in current or change projections. Exactly how irrigation may affect the remains something of a mystery. To solve this mystery, scientists in this study investigated how irrigation affects climate through the exchange of heat or fluxes from between the land surface and the atmosphere, the formation of low-level clouds, and to what extent irrigation may modify future climate change.

The PNNL research team led the study to incorporate an operational-like irrigation plan into the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) regional climate model. This included adding "sensors" and "triggers" in the model, similar to those employed by irrigation users, to detect the need and timing of irrigation for optimal water use. They evaluated the performance of the improved model in simulating the regional climate and surface water and energy budgets over the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) site. The team included a parameterization to represent irrigation in the Noah land surface model applied in WRF, and conducted a series of simulations with and without irrigation over the SGP for an extremely dry year (2006) and wet year (2007).

A large amount of observational data was obtained from the ARM archive, including soil moisture and temperature, surface fluxes, and meteorological conditions. These data are from the ARM Eddy Correlation Flux Measurement system, the Energy Balance Bowen Ratio station, the Soil Water and Temperature System, the Surface Meteorological Observation Systems, and the Oklahoma Mesonet. After processing, these datasets served as benchmarks for model evaluation.

The team's results demonstrate the importance of including a realistic irrigation parameterization in climate studies to improve the process-level understanding on the role of human activities in modulating land-air-cloud interactions and regional climate.

By applying a regional model over a limited domain for only two selected summers, the team was not able to investigate the possible downstream precipitation effect and the impact of irrigation on climatology. Future work will extend the time periods and increase the area studied to assess the impact of irrigation on regional climate and the water cycle. Their study will include the hydrologic responses such as runoff and streamflow over land and atmospheric processes above the boundary layer. They will also evaluate the impact of model resolution and physics, identified as the biggest sources of uncertainty in the existing modeling studies on irrigation effects.

Explore further: Lava from Hawaii volcano picks up speed

More information: Huang, Q. et al 2013. A Modeling Study of Irrigation Effects on Surface Fluxes and Land-Air-Cloud Interactions in the Southern Great Plains, Journal of Hydrometeorology 14(3):700-721.  DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-12-0134.1

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Irrigation can give rise to increased precipitation

Apr 17, 2013

PhD candidate Obbe Tuinenburg defended his doctoral thesis on the 15th of April, 2013. His research related to the effects of large-scale irrigation in India on the atmosphere and rainfall. One of the conclusions ...

Crops watering by phone

Jul 16, 2013

Thanks to a new app, smart phones could help monitor irrigation water use according to need. This could ensure that food is available on our table is the produced in a sustainable way.

Recommended for you

Icelandic volcano sits on massive magma hot spot

12 hours ago

Spectacular eruptions at Bárðarbunga volcano in central Iceland have been spewing lava continuously since Aug. 31. Massive amounts of erupting lava are connected to the destruction of supercontinents and ...

NASA sees Tropical Storm Ana still vigorous

14 hours ago

NASA's TRMM satellite saw that Tropical Storm Ana was still generating moderate rainfall is it pulled away from Hawaii. The next day, NASA's Aqua satellite saw that wind shear was having an effect on the ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

julianpenrod
1 / 5 (4) Aug 05, 2013
Those who wish to promote the scams built on climate change are curiously like those who resist the idea. They use only partial facts and resort to belligerence and viciousness when their lies are exposed. Like the deniers, they insist that "man cannot affect his environment, except with fossil fuels". The climate change scammers, for example, insist that dumping tons and tons of weather control chemicals from high flying jets can't affect the world's weather. They deny the existence of chemtrails, despite the evidence, just like climate change deniers. Crucial to their swindle, though, climate change scammers also deny things like windmills and solar collection farms can affect the environment. They don't even have the slimmest of evidence on their side, so, there, they usually just resort, if at all, only to verbal abuse.