Carbon-sequestering ocean plants may cope with climate changes over the long run

Aug 26, 2013
This is an image of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, taken by lead author Ina Benner using the San Francisco State University FE-Scanning Electron Microscope. Credit: Ina Benner

A year-long experiment on tiny ocean organisms called coccolithophores suggests that the single-celled algae may still be able to grow their calcified shells even as oceans grow warmer and more acidic in Earth's near future.

The study stands in contrast to earlier studies suggesting that would fail to build strong shells in . The world's oceans are expected to become more acidic as human activities pump increasing amounts of carbon dioxide into the Earth's atmosphere.

But after the researchers raised one strain of the Emiliania huxleyi coccolithorphore for over 700 generations, which took about 12 months, under high temperature and acidified conditions that are expected for the oceans 100 years from now, the organisms had no trouble producing their plated shells.

"At least in this experiment with one coccolithophore strain, when we combined higher levels of CO2 with higher temperatures, they actually did better in terms of ." said Jonathon Stillman, associate professor of biology at San Francisco State University, who along with Ed Carpenter, professor of biology, and Tomoko Komada, associate professor of chemistry, led a team of researchers at the University's Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies. The research was performed by postdoctoral scientist Ina Benner, masters students Rachel Diner and Dian Li and postdoctoral scientist Stephane Lefebvre.

Coccolithophores sequester oceanic carbon by incorporating it into their shells, which provide to speed the sinking of carbon to the deep sea. These little organisms are central to the , a role that could be disrupted if rising levels of and warming temperatures interfere with their ability to grow their calcified shells.

In previous experiments, the same SF State researchers found that the same strain of coccolithophores grown for hundreds of generations under cool and acidified grew less shell than those growing under current ocean conditions. In a short-term study by other researchers that examined the combined effects of higher temperatures and acidification, the same strain also had smaller shells under warmer and acidified conditions. However, results from this new long-term experiment suggest that this strain of coccolithophores may have the capacity to adapt to warmer and more acidic seas if given adequate time.

Stillman said the study underscores the importance of assessing multiple climactic factors and their impact on these organisms over a long time, to understand how they may cope with future oceanic environmental changes.

"We don't know why some strains might calcify more in the future, when others might calcify less," he said. Recent evidence indicates that the genetic diversity among coccolithophores in nature may hold part of the answer as to which strains and species might be "pre-adapted for future ," Stillman added.

While these results indicate that coccolithophore calcification might increase under future conditions, the researchers say that it's still unclear "whether, or how, such changes might affect carbon export to the ."

The researchers received another surprise when they used recently developed genomic approaches to compare the expression of genes related to calcification in coccolithophores grown under current and future seawater conditions. "We really expected to see a lot of genes known to be involved in calcification to change significantly in the cells that thrived under high temperature and high acidity," Stillman said, "given their increased levels of calcification."

But the researchers found no significant changes in the expression of genes known to be involved in calcification from prior studies comparing strains with dramatically different calcification levels. It could be that these genes work as a sort of "on-off switch" for calcification, Stillman suggested. There may be other genes at work that control calcification in more subtle ways, affecting the degree of calcification.

The study by the RTC scientists was supported by the National Science Foundation and published in the August 26 issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

Explore further: Shell files new plan to drill in Arctic

Related Stories

Carbon-eaters on the Black sea

Aug 03, 2012

(Phys.org) -- This brilliant cyan pattern scattered across the surface of the Black Sea is a bloom of microscopic phytoplankton. The multitude of single-celled algae in this image are most likely coccolithophores, ...

Effect of ocean acidification may not be so dire

Apr 15, 2013

(Phys.org) —Marine scientists have long understood the detrimental effect of fossil fuel emissions on marine ecosystems. But a group led by a UC Santa Barbara professor has found a point of resilience in ...

Shells slim down with CO2

Aug 09, 2011

Marine algae that turn carbon dissolved in seawater into shell will produce thinner and thinner shells as carbon dioxide levels increase.

Recommended for you

Shell files new plan to drill in Arctic

20 hours ago

Royal Dutch Shell has submitted a new plan for drilling in the Arctic offshore Alaska, more than one year after halting its program following several embarrassing mishaps.

Reducing water scarcity possible by 2050

21 hours ago

Water scarcity is not a problem just for the developing world. In California, legislators are currently proposing a $7.5 billion emergency water plan to their voters; and U.S. federal officials last year ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Atoyota
2.6 / 5 (5) Aug 26, 2013
We worry about CO2 and it's nice to know some organisms can adapt to a changing climate, but... as long as we destroy sequestering ecosystems by our misuse of the land... CO2 the symptom of climate change will create conditions we must adapt to face as well.
NikFromNYC
2.1 / 5 (11) Aug 26, 2013
Atoyota uses the term "some organisms" to describe *the* most abundant algae in the ocean that represent the very base of the ocean food chain, which carbon fertilization and other "pollution" has boosted productivity of by an astounding 40% since pre-industrial times:
http://www.google...0%25+220

"We suggest that the surge of fossil fuel use, mainly coal, since 2000 is a basic cause of the large increase of carbon uptake by the combined terrestrial and ocean carbon sinks. One mechanism by which fossil fuel emissions increase carbon uptake is by fertilizing the biosphere via provision of nutrients essential for tissue building, especially nitrogen, which plays a critical role in controlling net primary productivity and is limited in many ecosystems." - James Hansen, 2013 (Environ. Res. Lett.)
Egleton
2 / 5 (4) Aug 26, 2013
At last some good news.

Now if we can just ensure that the wheat producing areas of the USA dont loose 2" precipitation, things will look just peachy, If we can figure out how to plow and harvest sans Oil.

Uncle Sam is desperate to preserve his world in formaldehyde. Club of Rome says "Not a chance."
Confusius says. "Impermanence and Eternity."
antialias_physorg
2.6 / 5 (7) Aug 26, 2013
At last some good news.

Sure. Problem is if just one rung of the food chain doesn't cope with climate change it won't matter (for us) what the others do. We'll be screwed.
Herroprs
2.3 / 5 (8) Aug 26, 2013
Good Job. I will now add this to my "everything is going to be alright" Bookmarks folder.
Howhot
1 / 5 (1) Aug 27, 2013
It's not all that rosie. "the same SF State researchers found that the same strain of coccolithophores grown for hundreds of generations under cool and acidified water conditions grew less shell than those growing under current ocean conditions." Humm... solubility increases with temperature, I wonder how the little coccolithophores would survive HOT acid?

We can always put our faith in mankind to be good environmental stewards and not tip the atmospheric balance to much for this to become an problem for the oceans. Oh wait... CO2 levels are still increasing...