Will smart watches find many buyers?

Jul 30, 2013 by Troy Wolverton

When it comes to the target market for a smart watch, I'm probably it: I love tech, I'm often an early adopter of new gadgets and, until very recently, I was a lifelong watch wearer. But even I'm not sure I really need or want a smart watch.

These high-tech watches have been in the news lately. Pebble's smart watch recently made its retail debut in Best Buy. The second generation of Sony's wrist gadget is set to hit stores in September. And rumors have been flying that Apple, Google and Samsung all have their own smart watches in the works.

But at least as they exist now, smart watches seem too limited to convince me to wear one. And if I'm not all that interested, I've got to figure are going to have an even harder time convincing other consumers.

See, my dad is an ardent watch wearer and collector, and his interest rubbed off on me. Even though most Americans gave up wearing watches about the time they got their first cellphones, I continued to wear a until about a year ago. I'd probably be wearing it still if I hadn't lost the back to it.

I've since learned to live without it and just check my phone for the time and date. Given that I nearly always have my phone with me, I haven't really missed my watch, much to my dad's dismay.

And the fact is that my phone is a lot more useful as a timekeeping device than my real watch - a 20-year-old analog Swiss Army Watch knockoff - ever was. I use it daily to time and map my runs with my dog, having it alert me every time I hit a mile mark. When I'm on the road, I use it as an . And I've preset one of my apps with numerous timers that remind me to flip the fish I'm grilling or take the out of their roaster.

Still, I can see some of the appeal of a smart watch.

When I'm running, I often carry my phone in my hand. That's awkward, especially when I'm holding my dog's leash in the same hand.

I could buy an armband or a belt clip to put it in, but when I'm running I sometimes like to check the time or how far I've gone. I could see how a smart watch would not only be easier to carry, but also might allow me to check the time and my pace more easily than I can with my smartphone.

There have also been times I've struggled to get my phone out of my pocket when it rings. It would be easier to simply glance at a watch to see who's calling and determine whether I need to answer it.

But I'm not sure I want to carry around another device, and that's the big shortcoming of smart watches as they exist today. They're typically accessories to a smartphone, not stand-alone devices. Because smart watches don't have their own Internet connection, most everything you see on them comes from your smartphone via a Bluetooth link.

So to monitor my running app on a smart watch, I'd still have to carry my smartphone, which means I'd still have to find a place to put it.

And while being able to quickly see who's calling might be helpful for screening calls, I'd still need to pull my phone out of my pocket to talk on it.

Smart watches have another limitation: the size of their screen. You just can't fit a big display on a wrist-worn device. And with only an inch or so of screen space, a smart watch really can't do very much.

Sure, you could see the latest Facebook post from a friend on your watch. But if you really want to see your full news feed, you're going to have to do that on some other device. And who wants to play simple games like tick-tack-toe on a tiny screen when you can play much more enjoyable ones on your smartphone or tablet?

I'm willing to keep an open mind about smart watches. I'm eager to see what Apple, Google and Samsung come up with. And I'm excited that someday, with built-in antennas and potentially bigger and more flexible screens, they may be able to replace smartphones rather than simply supplement them.

But for now, I'm probably going to keep my wrists bare, even if it does pain my father.

Explore further: Montreal VR headset team turns to crowdfunding for Totem

1.5 /5 (4 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Are smart watches the next big thing?

Jul 24, 2013

If you're like most Americans, you don't wear a wristwatch. But increasingly, electronics companies are betting you'll slap one on your wrist if it's more like a smartphone than a simple timepiece.

Gadget Watch: Long-battery watch talks to iPhone

Jan 11, 2013

"Smart" watches that talk to cellphones have been around for some time, but they've been hampered by their high battery drain—usually needing recharging every few days. At this week's International CES ...

Recommended for you

Montreal VR headset team turns to crowdfunding for Totem

23 hours ago

A challenger in the virtual reality headset marketplace has launched a crowdfunding campaign to get the project off the ground. The headset is called Totem. The company behind Totem is Montreal-based Vrvana. ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

VendicarE
3 / 5 (2) Jul 30, 2013
"Will smart watches find many buyers?"

Nope
kingersnaps
not rated yet Jul 30, 2013
Why wouldn't they?? It just takes the right technology. The HOT Watch actually allows you to talk on the phone through your watch which is a step up from the regular smart watch. Check out their Kickstarter campaign
packrat
1 / 5 (1) Jul 30, 2013
"Will smart watches find many buyers?"

Nope


I have to mostly agree with you. There will be a quick rush on them especially when the Apple version hits the market (there always is no matter what they sell) but that's probably going to be about it.
You can buy full cell phones in watches already and nobody ever hears about them at least in the western countries. As an example of some of the many types - http://www.everbu...odq1YAAw

What I find funny is some of the full cell phone watches are not really any more expensive than these cell phone 'helper' watches are. Some of them even look like quality watches and not just little square boxes attached to a crappy plastic wristband.