Newly discovered flux in the Earth may solve missing-mantle mystery

July 16, 2013

It's widely thought that the Earth arose from violent origins: Some 4.5 billion years ago, a maelstrom of gas and dust circled in a massive disc around the Sun, gathering in rocky clumps to form asteroids. These asteroids, gaining momentum, whirled around a fledgling solar system, repeatedly smashing into each other to create larger bodies of rubble—the largest of which eventually cooled to form the planets.

Countless theories, simulations and geologic observations support such a scenario. But there remains one lingering mystery: If the Earth arose from the collision of asteroids, its composition should resemble that of meteoroids, the small that break off from asteroids.

But to date, scientists have found that, quite literally, something doesn't add up: Namely, the Earth's mantle—the layer between the planet's crust and core—is missing an amount of lead found in meteorites whose composition has been analyzed following impact with the Earth.

Much of the Earth is composed of rocks with a high ratio of to lead (uranium naturally decays to lead over time). However, according to standard theories of , the Earth should harbor a reservoir of mantle somewhere in its interior that has a low ratio of uranium to lead, to match the composition of meteorites. But such a reservoir has yet to be discovered—a detail that leaves Earth's origins hazy.

Now researchers in MIT's Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences have identified a "hidden flux" of material in the Earth's mantle that would make the planet's overall composition much more similar to that of meteorites. This reservoir likely takes the form of extremely dense, lead-laden rocks that crystallize beneath island arcs, strings of volcanoes that rise up at the boundary of .

As two massive plates push against each other, one plate subducts, or slides, under the other, pushing material from the crust down into the mantle. At the same time, molten material from the mantle rises up to the crust, and is ejected via volcanoes onto the Earth's surface.

According to the MIT researchers' observations and calculations, however, up to 70 percent of this rising magma crystallizes into dense rock—dropping, lead-like, back into the mantle, where it remains relatively undisturbed. The lead-heavy flux, they say, puts the composition of the Earth's mantle on a par with that of meteorites.

"Now that we know the composition of this flux, we can calculate that there's tons of this stuff dropping down from the base of the crust into the mantle, so it is likely an important reservoir," says Oliver Jagoutz, an assistant professor of geology at MIT. "This has a lot of implications for understanding how the Earth evolved through history."

Jagoutz and his colleague Max Schmidt, of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, have detailed their results in a paper published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

A Mantle Exposed

Measuring the composition of material that has dropped into the mantle is a nearly impossible task. Jagoutz estimates that such dense rocks would form at a depth of 40 to 50 kilometers below the surface, beyond the reach of conventional sampling techniques.

There is, however, one place on Earth where such a depth of the crust and mantle is exposed: a region of northern Pakistan called the Kohistan arc. Forty million years ago, this island arc was crushed between India and Asia as the two plates collided.

"When India came in, it slammed into the arc, and the arc extended and rotated itself," Jagoutz says. "Because of that, we now have a cross-section of the mantle-to-crust transition. This is the only place on Earth where this exists."

On various trips from 2000 to 2007, Jagoutz trekked through the Kohistan arc region, collecting rocks from various parts of the arc's crust and mantle. Bringing them back to the lab, he analyzed the rocks' density and composition, discovering that some were "density-unstable"—much denser than the mantle. These denser rocks could potentially sink into the mantle, creating a hidden reservoir.

Adding Up to an Asteroid Origin

The researchers measured the rocks' composition, and found that the denser rocks contained much more lead than uranium—exactly the ratio predicted for the missing reservoir of material. Jagoutz then performed a mass balance (a simple conservation-of-mass calculation) to determine how much dense rock drops into the mantle, based on the composition of the region's crust, rocks and mantle: Essentially, the mass of the Kohistan arc, minus whatever material drops into the mantle, should equal the material that comes out of the mantle.

Jagoutz and Schmidt solved the equation for 10 common elements. From their calculations, they found that 70 percent of the magma that rises from the mantle must ultimately drop back down, relatively heavy with lead. Applying this statistic to other island arcs in the world—such as the Andean volcanic belt and the Cascade Range—they found that the amount of material dropped into the globally equals the and quantity of the so-called missing reservoir—a finding that suggests that Earth did indeed form from the collision of meteorites.

"If we are right, one of the questions we have is: Why is the Earth capable of hiding something from us? Why is there never a that brings up these rocks?" Jagoutz adds. "You'd think it'd come back up, but it doesn't. It's actually interesting."

Explore further: Arctic rocks offer new glimpse of primitive Earth

More information:

Related Stories

Arctic rocks offer new glimpse of primitive Earth

August 11, 2010

Scientists have discovered a new window into the Earth's violent past. Geochemical evidence from volcanic rocks collected on Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic suggests that beneath it lies a region of the Earth's mantle ...

Ancient Earth crust stored in deep mantle

April 24, 2013

Scientists have long believed that lava erupted from certain oceanic volcanoes contains materials from the early Earth's crust. But decisive evidence for this phenomenon has proven elusive. New research from a team including ...

Study sheds light on Earth's early mantle

May 6, 2013

( —An international team of researchers, led by scientists at Boston University's Department of Earth and Environment, has found evidence that material contained in young oceanic lava flows originated at the Earth's ...

Recommended for you

Don't forget plankton in climate change models, says study

November 26, 2015

A new study from the University of Exeter, published in the journal Ecology Letters, found that phytoplankton - microscopic water-borne plants - can rapidly evolve tolerance to elevated water temperatures. Globally, phytoplankton ...

Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?

November 26, 2015

More than 190 countries are meeting in Paris next week to create a durable framework for addressing climate change and to implement a process to reduce greenhouse gases over time. A key part of this agreement would be the ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Jul 16, 2013
Such cross sections of the ocean crust, called ophiolites: http://en.wikiped...phiolite , are found on present or former active continental margins in other places besides this site in Pakistan.

Perhaps this guy meant to say that this is a unique exposure of island arc lithosphere.
1 / 5 (5) Jul 16, 2013
Re: "If we are right, one of the questions we have is: Why is the Earth capable of hiding something from us? Why is there never a volcano that brings up these rocks?" Jagoutz adds. "You'd think it'd come back up, but it doesn't. It's actually interesting."

This sort of thing is happening across many of the disciplines: An enigma is discovered which does not support existing theory, but since the scientist has been trained as a specialist, they might lack the broad perspective necessary to fully appreciate that it's a common occurrence.

I think that one reaction which the public should accept even if the theorists do not is the notion that the theory might actually be wrong. After all, the entire article deals with things we cannot actually see ... things happening within the Earth, the creation of the Earth, the origin of meteorites.

What we should be doing is supporting the creation of alternative theories by increasing instruction of the controversies of science in uni's.
not rated yet Jul 16, 2013
I'll be happy to go investigate some of our present day island chains, ummmm to look for any evidence related to this. Hawaii? Bahamas? Fiji?

I don't know anything about this, so my work cannot be unfairly biased by establishment dogma. That should make our friend Hans happy.

Such cross sections of the ocean crust, called ophiolites

This isn't an exposed section of crust. This is a frozen boundary region between two pieces of crust; a subduction zone that got pinched up out of the crust and cooled in place.
not rated yet Jul 16, 2013

"This isn't an exposed section of crust. This is a frozen boundary region between two pieces of crust; a subduction zone that got pinched up out of the crust and cooled in place."

Which is a ophiolite.

BTW, if this section or any other section of old ocean lithosphere (crust + upper mantle) wasn't exposed, then it couldn't be sampled in the first place.
1 / 5 (2) Jul 16, 2013
I understand subduction, ecretion. But I can't help but think Earth's impact with Theia plays a role here.
not rated yet Jul 16, 2013
I'll be interested to see if The RAS journal (Astronomy & Geophysics) prints this article in more detail (diagrams and stats) in the next issue.
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 17, 2013
Interesting, one constraint more fielded.

@hemitite: I think the article implies ophiolites, in your ref "[there is increasing evidence that most ophiolites are] generated when subduction begins", are not the drop-down flux material discovered here.

@HA: Of course the article confirms the exact opposite of what you are claiming, namely that a previous tension between theory and experiment has gone and the new question is compatible with the existing theory, and that you are no Galileo.

On the contrary, not only are you no Galileo, you are anti-science: "supporting the creation of alternative theories by increasing instruction of the controversies of science". Science moves by criticism, but also by recognition of theories as opposed to crackpot "alternative theories".
not rated yet Jul 17, 2013

Yes, the genesis of this particular crustal section, as I tried to indicate, was what was "unique" here. Island arc collisions with continent's active subducting margins are common, as the jumbled mess of the Franciscan Melange along the California coast testifies, but in those cases only the lighter rocks and sediments resist subduction to be plastered along the continental coast.

In above case, it appears that most of this island arc's lithosphere was caught and squeezed up between two converging continental plates.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.