New knowledge about permafrost improving climate models

Jul 28, 2013

New research findings from the Centre for Permafrost (CENPERM) at the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, document that permafrost during thawing may result in a substantial release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and that the future water content in the soil is crucial to predict the effect of permafrost thawing. The findings may lead to more accurate climate models in the future.

The permafrost is thawing and thus contributes to the release of carbon dioxide and other into the atmosphere. But the rate at which carbon dioxide is released from permafrost is poorly documented and is one of the most important uncertainties of the current models.

The knowledge available so far has primarily been based on measurements of the release of carbon dioxide in short-term studies of up to 3-4 months. The new findings are based on measurements carried out over a 12-year period. Studies with different water content have also been conducted. Professor Bo Elberling, Director of CENPERM (Centre for Permafrost) at the University of Copenhagen, is the person behind the novel research findings which are now being published in the internationally renowned scientific journal Nature Climate Change.

"From a perspective, it makes a huge difference whether it takes 10 or 100 years to release, e.g., half the permafrost carbon pool. We have demonstrated that the supply of oxygen in connection with drainage or drying is essential for a rapid release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere," says Bo Elberling.

Water content in the soil crucial to predict effect of permafrost thawing

The new findings also show that the future water content in the soil is a decisive factor for being able to correctly predict the effect of permafrost thawing. If the permafrost remains water-saturated after thawing, the carbon decomposition rate will be very low, and the release of carbon dioxide will take place over several hundred years, in addition to methane that is produced in waterlogged conditions. The findings can be used directly to improve existing .

The new studies are mainly conducted at the Zackenberg research station in North-East Greenland, but permafrost samples from four other locations in Svalbard and in Canada have also been included and they show a surprising similarity in the loss of carbon over time.

"It is thought-provoking that microorganisms are behind the entire problem – microorganisms which break down the carbon pool and which are apparently already present in the permafrost. One of the critical decisive factors – the – is in the same way linked to the original high content of ice in most permafrost samples. Yes, the temperature is increasing, and the permafrost is thawing, but it is, still, the characteristics of the which determine the long-term release of ," Bo Elberling concludes.

Explore further: Thousands of intense earthquakes rock Iceland

More information: Nature Climate Change DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1955

Related Stories

Climate change threatens permafrost in soil

Sep 20, 2012

In the coming century, permafrost in polar regions and alpine forests in the Northern Hemisphere may thaw rapidly, potentially releasing carbon and nitrogen that could cause additional regional warming. Permafrost occurs ...

Not-so-permanent permafrost

Oct 29, 2012

As much as 44 billion tons of nitrogen and 850 billion tons of carbon stored in arctic permafrost, or frozen ground, could be released into the environment as the region begins to thaw over the next century as a result of ...

Thawing permafrost likely to boost global warming

Sep 01, 2008

The thawing of permafrost in northern latitudes, which greatly increases microbial decomposition of carbon compounds in soil, will dominate other effects of warming in the region and could become a major force promoting the ...

Abrupt permafrost thaw increases climate threat

Nov 30, 2011

As the Arctic warms, greenhouse gases will be released from thawing permafrost faster and at significantly higher levels than previous estimates, according to survey results from 41 international scientists ...

Signs of thawing permafrost revealed from space

Mar 27, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- Satellite are seeing changes in land surfaces in high detail at northern latitudes, indicating thawing permafrost. This releases greenhouse gases into parts of the Arctic, exacerbating the ...

Recommended for you

NASA sees Depression 12-E become Tropical Storm Lowell

22 hours ago

In less than 24 hours after Tropical Depression 12-E was born in the eastern Pacific Ocean it strengthened into Tropical Storm Lowell. NOAA's GOES-West and NASA's Aqua satellite captured infrared images of ...

Why global warming is taking a break

23 hours ago

The average temperature on Earth has barely risen over the past 16 years. ETH researchers have now found out why. And they believe that global warming is likely to continue again soon.

User comments : 15

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Neinsense99
3.2 / 5 (23) Jul 28, 2013
Sadly, permafrost isn't as resilient as permaFUD. The usual suspects will be along shortly to spread doubt and down-vote the comments of those they or their employers don't like.

Science under fire from 'merchants of doubt': US historian
http://phys.org/n...ian.html

lewando
1.6 / 5 (19) Jul 28, 2013
It is good that that climate scientists have identified, and are working on, a list of "the most important uncertainties of the current climate models".

It is good that the models are continually being improved.

A couple quotes seem relevant--

Josh Billings: "It ain't what you know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just ain't so."

Donald Rumsfeld: "...But there are also unknown unknowns-- there are things we do not know we don't know."
axemaster
4.7 / 5 (13) Jul 28, 2013
Ah yes, Naomi Oreskes. She has given some excellent and thought-provoking talks on the subject of climate denial. Definitely worth listening to if you have the time. Here's one of them.

http://www.youtub...UF_Rmlio
NikFromNYC
1.3 / 5 (24) Jul 29, 2013
Reality check on "Conspiracy Queen" Oreskes:

http://www.americ...een.html

Posting researched content costs me personal time and money, especially since if I could get good science news without daily doses of the Teflon "science" of alarmist climatology, I would get more done since I wouldn't be so pissed off about the loss of value of science in our culture. I'm embarrassed to even tell people I'm a chemist by training since the Upper West Side women I live around as well as the witty hipsters I run into downtown are all still throwing their sex into support for alarm. It was cool to be skeptical after Climategate revealed simple corruption of peer review in climatology, but it's again a social handicap now that puritanical Republicans are on board.
NikFromNYC
1.3 / 5 (23) Jul 29, 2013
All these claims about the release of evil plant food into the sky conceal the blunt and non-controversial fact that CO2 is only evil based upon computer models that include massive (3X) amplification of the standard greenhouse effect. Yet propagandists who here call for the execution of skeptics would have you see us as straw men who "deny" the classic theory of greenhouse gas warming akin to how Gore's tobacco industry denied the deadly effects of a smoking habit.

The old motto of IBM need be applied to understand corruption: THINK.
NikFromNYC
1.3 / 5 (24) Jul 29, 2013
Neinsense woefully lamented about his ratings war:

"The usual suspects will be along shortly to spread doubt and down-vote the comments of those they or their employers don't like."

Oh, I up-vote for fun, so your free plugs, re-quotes of my posts, and especially your side's cultish illogic, regular hate speech and slander will help casual users know there is muckracking content behind their ratings filter. For the record I am self-employed which allows me to speak out where academic scientists so far cannot.

The Harvard trained geologist who walked on the Moon, now senator Harrison Schmitt, points out: "They've seen too many of their colleagues lose grant funding when they haven't gone along with the so-called political consensus that we're in a human-caused global warming."
alfie_null
4.7 / 5 (13) Jul 29, 2013
THINK.

I'm getting the irony here.

If you find yourself wasting time here, well, only you can do something about it. I'll help you along though.

You aren't going to change anyone's mind in this forum, so don't bother trying. Climatology is outside your knowledge domain. I don't particularly care that you, a non-climatologist, disagree with all the bona fide climatologists. And you might give a thought to what it sounds like when you group all who disagree with you in their area of expertise as members of some conspiracy.
NikFromNYC
1.3 / 5 (25) Jul 29, 2013
Alfie Null wrote: "You aren't going to change anyone's mind in this forum, so don't bother trying."

You can't deprogram cult members, no, but you can expose them as being proudly a part of one, and that's not a waste of time at all.

Your comment is one of the best of the week in that regard, demonstrating that you will only listen to authority, a profoundly anti-scientific sentiment.

NASA's Gavin Schmidt, your mentor, has a Ph.D. not in carbon chemistry like I do from Columbia University but one in applied mathematics from University College London. He has never run a real experiment in his life. James Hansen has a degree in astronomy from the University of Iowa. Al Gore, who you adore, has a degree in divinity studies.

I invoke no conspiracy theory beyond the boring old corruption of science by activist government funding but now the junk science Food Pyramid has been replaced by the junk science Carbon Footprint Counter.

If I sound so bad, you should be happy, not so sad.
antigoracle
1.3 / 5 (24) Jul 29, 2013
When the entire AGW Alarmist scripture is based on the CO2 lie, this "research" is just more millions wasted that could have been used to save lives.
djr
4.5 / 5 (15) Jul 29, 2013
Nik - "For the record I am self-employed which allows me to speak out where academic scientists so far cannot."

Just read a few bloggs by scientists that are working in the 'institution' (for example Pharyngula - by PZ Myers.) and you will see that such folks are very free to 'speak out' - the difference between you and someone like Myers is that he requires the evidence to support his position.

meBigGuy
4.3 / 5 (17) Jul 30, 2013
Repeating an earlier post by Nik where he sarcastically stated:
"Consensus: There is an ether that pervades space. Continents don't move (despite an obvious jigsaw puzzle match between them)! Dirty hands don't kill surgical patients! Children are a blank slate, personality wise with no genetic influence! The best therapy is to treat human beings as if we were shocking pigeons and ringing bells for dogs. Non-coding DNA is"junk". Viruses have nothing to do with ulcers or certain cancers. Bacterial spontaneously generate."

To which I add the one you forgot: "humans can't cause climate change, only natural cycles can".

It's amazing that you can't see how you are on the wrong side of this, denying the science based on out of context cherry picked data. You mind is made up so you only see that which supports your pre-conception, regardless of source. If the things you are saying were real there would be crowds of people publishing the data to support it. I started as a denier ....
deepsand
3.1 / 5 (17) Jul 30, 2013
When the entire AGW Alarmist scripture is based on the CO2 lie, this "research" is just more millions wasted that could have been used to save lives.

Any monies spent on your education were most definitely wasted.
Neinsense99
2.4 / 5 (11) Jul 31, 2013
When the entire AGW Alarmist scripture is based on the CO2 lie, this "research" is just more millions wasted that could have been used to save lives.

...slave lives. There, fixed that for you.
Neinsense99
2.2 / 5 (10) Jul 31, 2013
When the entire AGW Alarmist scripture is based on the CO2 lie, this "research" is just more millions wasted that could have been used to save lives.


Why, you CAN suppress the potty mouth, if only while smearing and accusing others of lying! It's a remarkable change from the fecal matter fixation you usually exhibit. https://duckduckg...cle+turd It's almost encouraging!
Neinsense99
2.2 / 5 (10) Jul 31, 2013
Reality check on "Conspiracy Queen" Oreskes:

http://www.americ...een.html

If you scroll down on your linked page, one finds this tidbit: "Norman Rogers is a Senior Policy Advisor at the Heartland Institute and maintains a personal website. "

It would be an insult to yellow to call that propaganda blog yellow journalism.