New study ignites debate over Indonesia's mud volcano

Jul 22, 2013
Indonesian activists cover themselves in sludge from a mud volcano during a protest in Porong village on May 29, 2011. Scientists have sparked a fresh debate over what triggered Indonesia's Lusi mud volcano, still spewing truckloads of slime more than seven years after it leapt catastrophically into life.

Scientists on Sunday sparked a fresh debate over what triggered Indonesia's Lusi mud volcano, still spewing truckloads of slime more than seven years after it leapt catastrophically into life.

Published in the journal Nature Geoscience, the study strengthens the argument by gas company PT Lapindo Brantas that the disaster was caused by a distant earthquake, not by its drilling crew as some experts contend.

Lusi, located in the Sidoarjo district of the island of Java, erupted on May 29, 2006 in the middle of a rice field.

It has destroyed 13 villages, dozens of factories and shops and a highway, prompting the government to build dykes 10 metres (33 feet) high to try to contain its spread. Nearly 50,000 people were displaced.

The new research, by a team led by Stephen Miller at the University of Bonn in Germany, suggests the eruption was caused by the 6.3-magnitude earthquake that occurred two days earlier near Yogyakarta.

"We conclude that the Lusi mud eruption was a natural occurrence," they write.

Even though the two events were some 250 kilometres (125 miles) apart, the rock formation at Sidoarjo has a shape and structure that acted rather like a lens, amplifying and focussing the wave of seismic energy from Yogyakarta, according to their computer model.

The jolt of energy would have liquefied the source of the mud, causing it to be injected into a fault connected with a deep hydrothermal system. This superheated blowout feeds the eruption today, goes their theory.

A displaced resident immerses himself in mud deposits during a protest in Sidoarjo village on Indonesia's Java island on May 29, 2013. A new study strengthens the argument by gas company PT Lapindo Brantas that the disaster was caused by a distant earthquake, not by its drilling crew as some experts contend.

Asked to comment on the study, British geologist Richard Davies pointed to the daily drilling reports from the Lapindo Brantas team at Sidoarjo.

It showed their gas exploration was going awry, Davies said.

On the day of the eruption, the drillers acknowledged that they were having problems in stabilising pressure in the hole, a routine procedure that uses injected fluids, as they sought to withdrew their drill bit, he said.

That, and the lack of protective casing around the hole, "was like pulling the cork out of a champagne bottle," causing a "kick" of high-pressure mud to blow from the hole, Davies, a professor at Durham University, told AFP in a phone interview.

"When the Yogyakarta earthquake occurred, nothing happened in the well. The pressure in the well was already many orders of magnitude bigger than the pressure changes due to the Yogyakarta earthquake," Davies.

"They've come up with an elaborate geophysical model but I think they've ignored the more obvious data," said Davies said.

Seismologists have widely, but not unanimously, sided with his explanation. Some note that much larger earthquakes had previously occurred closer to Sidoarjo yet not caused any mud volcano.

On May 24, 2011 over nine meters of sludge deposits pile up from the mud volcano that displaced nearly 50,000 people. Scientists have sparked a fresh debate over what triggered Indonesia's Lusi mud volcano, still spewing truckloads of slime more than seven years after it leapt catastrophically into life.

At its peak, Lusi disgorged 180,000 cubic metres (6.4 million cubic feet) of mud a day.

Today, the rate has fallen to between 15,000 and 20,000 cu. m.(500,000 and 700,000 cu. ft.) per day, according to the government's Sidoarjo Mudflow Mitigation Agency, or BPLS.

This is roughly equivalent to between six and eight Olympic-sized swimming pools of muck per day.

Amein Widodo, a geologist from the Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology in nearby Surabaya city, said it was impossible to predict how long the volcano would keep erupting. "The amount of mud has reduced a lot, but having seen other cases in Java, it's possible it could erupt for more than 100 years," said Widodo.

All victims have received some compensation, some of them from the government and others from Lapindo Brantas, despite its claim of no wrongdoing. The company is part of a business empire controlled by Indonesia's powerful Bakrie family.

Around 5,000 people are still waiting for full payment.

Explore further: Lava from Hawaii volcano picks up speed

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Icelandic volcano sits on massive magma hot spot

Oct 24, 2014

Spectacular eruptions at Bárðarbunga volcano in central Iceland have been spewing lava continuously since Aug. 31. Massive amounts of erupting lava are connected to the destruction of supercontinents and ...

NASA sees Tropical Storm Ana still vigorous

Oct 24, 2014

NASA's TRMM satellite saw that Tropical Storm Ana was still generating moderate rainfall is it pulled away from Hawaii. The next day, NASA's Aqua satellite saw that wind shear was having an effect on the ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

cantdrive85
1 / 5 (9) Jul 22, 2013
"They've come up with an elaborate geophysical model but I think they've ignored the more obvious data," said Davies said.
Seismologists have widely, but not unanimously, sided with his explanation. Some note that much larger earthquakes had previously occurred closer to Sidoarjo yet not caused any mud volcano.

As such, seismologists are widely, but not unanimously, moronic...
ForFreeMinds
2.1 / 5 (7) Jul 22, 2013
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to sue someone for damages caused by natural disasters. Thus instead of one losing value as a result of their choice of place to live, they can put the blame on someone else. I bet if you put it to a vote of the villagers affected by the volcano, they'll vote that someone with deep pockets caused the damage, and to jail them until they pay.
Neinsense99
2.5 / 5 (8) Jul 23, 2013
"They've come up with an elaborate geophysical model but I think they've ignored the more obvious data," said Davies said.
Seismologists have widely, but not unanimously, sided with his explanation. Some note that much larger earthquakes had previously occurred closer to Sidoarjo yet not caused any mud volcano.

As such, seismologists are widely, but not unanimously, moronic...

It's caused by anti-science trolls and their underground mud-slinging facility...
dtxx
1 / 5 (3) Jul 23, 2013
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to sue someone for damages caused by natural disasters. Thus instead of one losing value as a result of their choice of place to live, they can put the blame on someone else. I bet if you put it to a vote of the villagers affected by the volcano, they'll vote that someone with deep pockets caused the damage, and to jail them until they pay.


Italy recently prosecuted a group of seismologists for not predicting an earthquake that caused fatalities. I didn't think it was very nice though, kind of primitive actually...