Evolution of monogamy in humans the result of infanticide risk

Jul 29, 2013

The threat of infants being killed by unrelated males is the key driver of monogamy in humans and other primates. The study by academics from UCL, University of Manchester, University of Oxford and University of Auckland, is the first to reveal this evolutionary pathway for the emergence of pair living.

The team also found that following the emergence of males are more likely to care for their . Where fathers care for young, not only can they protect infants from other males, but they can also share the burden of childcare.

Dr Kit Opie (UCL Anthropology), lead author of the study published in the journal PNAS, said: "This is the first time that the theories for the evolution of monogamy have been systematically tested, conclusively showing that is the driver of monogamy. This brings to a close the long running debate about the origin of monogamy in ."

Infants are most vulnerable when they are fully dependent on their mother because females delay further conception while nursing slowly developing young. This leads to the threat from unrelated males, who can bring the next conception forward by killing the infant. Sharing the costs of raising young both shortens the period of infant dependency and can allow females to reproduce more quickly.

An additional benefit of sharing the burden of care is that females can then have more costly young. The considerable cognitive requirements of living in complex societies has resulted in many primate species having large, and costly, brains.

Growing a big is expensive and requires that offspring mature slowly. Caring fathers can help alleviate the burden of looking after young with long childhoods and may explain how large brains could evolve in humans.

Humans, uniquely among primates, have both very long childhoods and mothers that can reproduce quickly relative to other great apes. Until now, a number of have been proposed to explain the evolution of monogamy among . These include:

  • Paternal care, when the cost of raising offspring is high
  • Guarding solitary females from rival males
  • Infanticide risk, where males can provide protection against rival males

To uncover the evolutionary pathway the team gathered data across 230 . These were then plotted on a family tree of the relationships between those species. Bayesian methods were used to re-run evolution millions of times across the family tree to discover whether different behaviours evolved together across time, and if so, which behaviour evolved first.

This then allowed the team to determine the timing of trait evolution and show that male infanticide is the cause of the switch from a multi-male mating system to monogamy in primates, while bi-parental care and solitary ranging by females are a result of monogamy, not the cause.

Dr Susanne Shultz, from the University of Manchester, said: "What makes this study so exciting is that it allows us to peer back into our evolutionary past to understand the factors that were important in making us human. Once fathers decide to stick around and care for young, mothers can then change their reproductive decisions and have more, brainy offspring."

Explore further: A two generation lens: Current state policies fail to support families with young children

More information: Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates , www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1307903110

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Shorebirds prefer a good body to a large brain

Jul 18, 2013

In many animal species, males and females differ in terms of their brain size. The most common explanation is that these differences stem from sexual selection. But predictions are not always certain. A team ...

Recommended for you

Scholar tracks the changing world of gay sexuality

15 hours ago

With same-sex marriage now legalized in 19 states and laws making it impossible to ban homosexuals from serving in the military, gay, lesbian and bisexual people are now enjoying more freedoms and rights than ever before.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2013
Monogamy is rare in mammals and humans are the only great ape to do it. Invading males do kill young in chimpanzee colonies but chimpanzees are not monogamous.

There is no evidence that the last common ancestor between chimps and humans was monogamous, nor any of the ancestor species.

Since when does wishful thinking qualify as science? The evidence clearly shows that human monogamy evolved AFTER the last common ancestor between chimps and humans.

And since when did modern humans reliably mate for life? To assure fidelity, discipline must be imposed via culture...did this evolve in ape ancestors as well???
Ophelia
4 / 5 (1) Jul 29, 2013
And since when did modern humans reliably mate for life? To assure fidelity, discipline must be imposed via culture...did this evolve in ape ancestors as well???


I think the point was monogamy during infancy, not for life.
Sinister1811
2.3 / 5 (6) Jul 30, 2013
This is nonsense. In some cultures, men have multiple wives. It has nothing to do with evolution and more to do with whether or not it's culturally acceptable.