Detecting DNA in space

Jul 09, 2013 by Jennifer Chu
Credit: NASA

If there is life on Mars, it's not too farfetched to believe that such Martian species may share genetic roots with life on Earth.

More than 3.5 billion years ago, a blitz of meteors ricocheted around the solar system, passing material between the two fledgling planets. This galactic game of pingpong may have left bits of Earth on Mars, and vice versa, creating a shared genetic ancestry between the two planets.

Such a theory holds great appeal for Christopher Carr, a research scientist in MIT's Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences. Working with Gary Ruvkun at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Maria Zuber, the E.A. Griswold Professor of Geophysics and MIT's vice president for research, Carr is building a DNA sequencer that he hopes will one day be sent to Mars, where it can analyze soil and ice samples for traces of DNA and other .

Now in a step toward that goal, Carr and colleagues at MIT, Harvard University and MGH have exposed the heart of their tool—a DNA-sequencing microchip—to similar to those that might be expected during a robotic expedition to Mars. After exposure to such radiation—including protons and heavy ions of oxygen and iron—the microchip analyzed a test strain of E. coli, successfully identifying its .

Carr says the group's results show the microchip can survive up to two years in space—long enough to reach Mars and gather data there for a year and a half.

"Over time on Mars, a chip's performance could degrade, reducing our ability to get . The chip might have a higher error rate, or could fail to function at all," Carr says. "We did not see any of these issues [in our tests]. … Once this chip has been through two years of a Mars mission, it still will be able to sequence."

The researchers reported their results in a paper published in the journal Astrobiology.

Simulating a solar storm

Any life on Mars, past or present, would have to be extremely resilient: The planet's atmosphere, made mostly of carbon dioxide, is 100 times thinner than Earth's, providing very little warmth. Temperatures can plummet to minus 195 degrees Fahrenheit.

On the other hand, the deep subsurface of Mars is not much different from that of Earth, which is known to harbor microbes. Results from the Curiosity rover, currently exploring Mars, suggest that beneath the planet's surface lies a dry and cold—but otherwise likely benign—environment, with all the major elements required for life.

To detect such subterranean life, a DNA-sequencing instrument on the surface of Mars would have to withstand temperature swings and steady exposure to space radiation. Such exposure could cause chips to report false positives, for instance, or to record extra bases in DNA sequences.

Carr and his colleagues tested the effects of Mars-like radiation on a commercially available sequencing chip. The tested chip contains 1.3 million microwells, each of which can hold a single bead containing an amplified fragment of DNA that can be used to generate a DNA sequence.

To test the chip's resilience to radiation, the team traveled to NASA's Space Radiation Laboratory at Brookhaven National Laboratory. Once there, the researchers, working with a total of 40 microchips, first performed electrical testing on 20 chips—a process by which a chip's gain, voltage and wells are calibrated to verify that the parts are working properly.

Following electrical testing, Carr exposed the chips to various levels of radiation, using a linear accelerator and an electron-beam ion source. The highest radiation dose sustained by the chips was more than they would experience during a two-year mission to Mars.

After the chips were irradiated, the team once again tested the electrical performance of each, and found very little change in the chips' functioning.

Life on Mars and beyond

In a second round of testing, Carr exposed the remaining 20 microchips to the same radiation levels as the first batch, then took the chips back to his lab and loaded each with DNA fragments from E. coli. Despite their exposure to radiation, the chips were able to analyze DNA and correctly identified the bacterial sequences.

"These chips are great candidates to do sequencing on Mars without any modifications that we know of right now," Carr says. "We essentially see no impact from radiation. That was a critical thing for us to show."

Chris McKay, a planetary scientist with the Space Science Division of NASA's Ames Research Center, says a radiation-resilient DNA-sequencing , such as the one used in this experiment, is a promising candidate for future life-detecting missions to Mars and other planets.

The paper by Carr and colleagues "reports on an important step forward on the development of DNA sequencers for planetary missions," says McKay, who did not contribute to the research. "In addition to being part of the search for life on other worlds, the DNA searcher would be relevant to assessing sites for human exploration."

In previous studies, Carr and his colleagues have found that the reagents used in DNA sequencing can also withstand similar radiation levels. Taken together, Carr says, the results suggest genetic sequencing may be a viable process in space.

Beyond Mars, Carr says, DNA sequencing may be of interest in places such as Jupiter's moon Europa, where liquid oceans may harbor signs of life. More promising, Carr says, are places like Enceladus, a moon of Saturn that is thought to be in a potential habitable zone, and that has much less intense .

"I do think we'll see DNA sequencing in space at some point," Carr says. "Hopefully we'll get a chance to be a part of that."

The paper is titled "Radiation Resistance of Sequencing Chips for in situ Life Detection."

Explore further: Student to live in simulated space habitat

More information:… 0.1089/ast.2012.0923

Related Stories

Regolith: Protection for humans on Mars

Sep 18, 2012

For six weeks the rover "Curiosity" is now working on Mars. NASA also plans to send humans to Mars within the next 20 years. On the flight and during the stay on Moon or Mars the astronauts have to be protected ...

NASA tests Mars rover prototype in Chile

Jun 29, 2013

NASA scientists said Friday they were testing a prototype of a robot the US space agency hopes to send to Mars in 2020 in Chile's Atacama desert.

Recommended for you

Europe sat-nav launch glitch linked to frozen pipe

4 hours ago

A frozen fuel pipe in the upper stage of a Soyuz launcher likely caused the failure last month to place two European navigation satellites in orbit, a source close to the inquiry said Wednesday.

Cyanide ice in Titan's atmosphere

6 hours ago

Gigantic polar clouds of hydrogen cyanide roughly four times the area of the UK are part of the impressive atmospheric diversity of Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, a new study led by Leiden Observatory, ...

Video: Alleged meteor caught on Russian dash cam (again)

9 hours ago

Thanks to the ubiquity of dashboard-mounted video cameras in Russia yet another bright object has been spotted lighting up the sky over Siberia, this time a "meteor-like object" seen on the evening of Saturday, Sept. 27.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Jul 09, 2013
So radiation is not so damaging to DNA as the LNT anti-nukes would have us believe? Here there is no DNA repair capability but still the DNA is recognizable.
5 / 5 (4) Jul 09, 2013
So radiation is not so damaging to DNA as the LNT anti-nukes would have us believe? Here there is no DNA repair capability but still the DNA is recognizable

Go back and read the article, not just the headline. That's not what they said.

They simply tested a DNA detection machine, to see if the machine could handle space radiation. They did not expose any DNA to space radiation.

Getting back to what the article WAS about: This kind of machine would only detect live or well-preserved living organisms. A search for signs of life, rather than life itself, would be more comprehensive, since it would cover both past and present life.
2.7 / 5 (7) Jul 09, 2013
The machine uses some complimentary DNA sequences for detection in its 1.3 million micro wells. This, static DNA infused in a chip, can retain its chip function after two years in space. This is not a long sequence, part of a living organism, part of any active metabolism, and so on. It doesn't speak at all to theories of panspermia.
5 / 5 (2) Jul 09, 2013
This is not a long sequence, part of a living organism, part of any active metabolism, and so on. It doesn't speak at all to theories of panspermia

That's an interesting point. But it might be relevant to the concept of panspermia, depending on whether there are variants of life that do not have DNA. If we were to find signs of life on Mars without DNA, or if it were really radically different than life on Earth, then it may rule out panspermia.
5 / 5 (2) Jul 09, 2013
"This galactic game of pingpong may have left bits of Earth on Mars, and vice versa, creating a shared genetic ancestry between the two planets."

That is unlikely, seeing how we have a smooth protein fold family phylogeny passing through the DNA LUCA stage to the RNA cells. Latest at the UCA stage, which likely was based on fission-fusion cycles and/or non-neglectable vertical gene transfer, a transpermia event would have been visible. But it is not.

This tests the evolution process, which favors the more adapted populations, as well as the rapid abiogenesis seen, which favors a local process. The earliest, still arguable, trace fossils are the Isua BIFs @ 3.8 Ga bp, which with microanalysis has evidence of early oxidating metabolism despite their later metamorphosis.
5 / 5 (2) Jul 09, 2013

This is now synchronous with the validation of the late bombardment chronology on Mercury by MESSENGER, obliterating all of the visible crust up to 3.8 Ga bp by bombardment generated volcanism. The same erasure up to 3.8 Ga bp that Earth and Moon crust shows.

Meaning life got started as early as bombardment allowed. Either after the late spike. Or after the early massive decrease and surviving the spike - likely, according to models of cellular population spread and survival - cells are more durable than rocks!

It is arguable that DNA is the only possible more chemically stable metabolite out of RNA there is. RNA seems to be the chemical bottleneck for life for reasons of thermodynamics (allows replicators without more energetically expensive protein enzymes) and chemistry (allows for both replicators, enzymes and 3D structures). I would be much more happy if they take this durable technology and complement it with a reverse transcriptase optional pre-process.