Most accurate measurement of Boltzmann constant yet

Jul 10, 2013

Scientists at the UK's National Physical Laboratory (NPL) have performed the most accurate measurement yet of the Boltzmann constant.

While the impact of such an achievement is not immediately obvious, the measurement could revolutionise the way we define , replacing the standard method that has been used for over 50 years.

The new measurement is 1.380 651 56 (98) × 10?23 J K?1, where the (98) shows the uncertainty in the last two , which amounts to an uncertainty of 0.7 parts per million —almost half the previous lowest uncertainty.

The result has been published today, 11 July, in the journal Metrologia by IOP Publishing on behalf of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM).

Scientists currently define the and the degree Celsius using the temperature of the triple point of water – the point at which , solid ice and can all exist in .

This 'standard temperature' has been defined as 273.16 K exactly. The temperature measurements we make in everyday life are an assessment of how much hotter or colder an object is compared to this value.

As temperature measurements need to be made with increasing accuracy across a wide range of disciplines, fixing a single temperature as a standard becomes problematic, especially when you're measuring extremely hot or .

Lead author of the study, Dr Michael de Podesta, said: The further away one measures from the temperature of the triple point of water, the harder it gets to precisely determine the ratio of exactly how much hotter or colder the temperature is than the standard temperature. This adds uncertainty to temperature measurements on top of the normal practical difficulties."

The solution is to redefine the kelvin using a fixed constant of nature, just as the metre has moved from a physical piece of metal to the length of the path travelled by light in over a specified number of nanoseconds. The suggested method is to use the Boltzmann constant, which is a measure of the relationship between the kinetic energy of molecules and temperature.

"It is fascinating that we worked out how to measure temperature long before we knew what temperature actually was. Now we understand that the temperature of an object is related to the energy of motion of its constituent atoms and molecules. When you touch an object and it feels 'hot' you are literally sensing the 'buzzing' of the atomic vibrations. The new definition directly links the unit of temperature to this basic physical reality," continued de Podesta.

In this study, the researchers, in collaboration with Cranfield University and the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), used acoustic thermometry to make the measurement by building an acoustic resonator and making amazingly precise measurements of the speed of sound in argon gas.

The researchers first cooled the resonator to the temperature of the triple point of water so they knew the temperature exactly in the current definition and filled it with argon gas that had its isotopic purity assessed by the SUERC team.

Then they used the speed of sound measurement to calculate the average speed of the argon molecules and hence the average amount of kinetic energy that they had – from this they were able to calculate the Boltzmann constant with an extremely high accuracy.

In order to achieve this high accuracy, the researchers also needed to measure the radius of the resonator with a high accuracy.

The team at Cranfield University used a single-crystal diamond cutting tool to produce four copper hemispheres. The best pair, when put together, formed a triaxially-ellipsoidal resonator that was the correct shape to within one thousandth of a millimetre. The radius was then calculated using the specific frequencies at which the wavelength of microwaves exactly fit into the resonator and was measured with an overall uncertainty of 11.7 nm, which is the thickness of about 600 atoms.

"This experiment has been exhilarating, and after six years we are exhausted. Every aspect of the experiment has required pushing science and engineering to the limit. In this kind of work we need to worry constantly about all the things which might go wrong, and how they might affect the results. We are looking forward to worrying a little less and getting on with exploiting some of the new technology we have invented in the course of the project," continued de Podesta.

Explore further: New method for non-invasive prostate cancer screening

More information: "A low-uncertainty measurement of the Boltzmann constant" de Podesta M, Underwood R J, Sutton G, Morantz P, Harris P M, Mark D F, Stuart F M, Vargha G and Machin G 2013 Metrologia 50 354-376. iopscience.iop.org/0026-1394/50/4/354

Related Stories

A big step towards the redefinition of the kelvin

Sep 20, 2011

Metrologists are measurement artists who are very precise – in the case of the Boltzmann constant up to the sixth decimal place. Whoever is able to determine it very exactly will cause a small revolution in the field ...

NPL and SUERC calibrate a 'rock clock'

Jan 05, 2012

New research by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC) will improve the accuracy of estimates of the time of geological events. The work centres on the calibration ...

The world's slowest clock

Jan 17, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- National Physical Laboratory is well known for having some of the fastest and most accurate clocks in the world, but now new research with the Scottish Universities Environmental Research ...

Sensors for the real world

Nov 05, 2012

Over the last decade there has been an increased interest in developing resonators for gravitmetric sensing; however, the sensors' response to variations in temperature has prevented them from being used outside the laboratory. ...

Recommended for you

New method for non-invasive prostate cancer screening

2 hours ago

Cancer screening is a critical approach for preventing cancer deaths because cases caught early are often more treatable. But while there are already existing ways to screen for different types of cancer, ...

How bubble studies benefit science and engineering

3 hours ago

The image above shows a perfect bubble imploding in weightlessness. This bubble, and many like it, are produced by the researchers from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. What ...

Famous Feynman lectures put online with free access

4 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Back in the early sixties, physicist Richard Feynman gave a series of lectures on physics to first year students at Caltech—those lectures were subsequently put into print and made into text ...

Single laser stops molecular tumbling motion instantly

8 hours ago

In the quantum world, making the simple atom behave is one thing, but making the more complex molecule behave is another story. Now Northwestern University scientists have figured out an elegant way to stop a molecule from ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

h0dges
5 / 5 (1) Jul 11, 2013
Oh phys.org!

The standard temperature is 273.15 K, NOT 273.16 K.

*facepalm*
Noumenon
1.8 / 5 (24) Jul 11, 2013
Oh phys.org!

The standard temperature is 273.15 K, NOT 273.16 K.

*facepalm*


Are you sure you're not confusing the triple point with absolute zero in Celsius?,....
−273.15 °C

facepalm².
Noumenon
1.8 / 5 (24) Jul 11, 2013
0 K = - 273.15°C while the triple point is 273.16 K = 0.01°C
ant_oacute_nio354
1 / 5 (7) Jul 11, 2013
The true units of the Boltzmann constant are square meter or
farad.

Antonio Jose Saraiva
julianpenrod
2 / 5 (8) Jul 11, 2013
The motivation mentioned in the article for calculating the Boltzmann Constant so precisely is to measure extreme temperature in situ, rather than start at 0 Centigrade or wherever and work your way up. In essence, they recommend having a precise value for Boltzmann's Constant and then comparing it to the variation of the temperature of a system with input mechanical energy. A problem, though, is , what if an extreme system does not respond linearly with respect to increasing energy input and temperature? What if, for example, at some point, under some conditions, it assumes an entirely different Boltzmann "Constant"?