'Spiritual' young people more likely to commit crimes than 'religious' ones, study finds

Jun 12, 2013

Young adults who deem themselves "spiritual but not religious" are more likely to commit property crimes—and to a lesser extent, violent ones—than those who identify themselves as either "religious and spiritual" or "religious but not spiritual," according to Baylor University researchers.

The sociologists' study, published in the journal Criminology, also showed that those in a fourth category—who say they are neither spiritual nor religious —are less likely to commit property crimes than the "spiritual but not religious" individuals. But no difference was found between the two groups when it came to .

"The notion of being spiritual but not associated with any organized religion has become increasingly popular, and our question is how that is different from being religious, whether you call yourself 'spiritual' or not," said Sung Joon Jang, Ph.D., an associate professor of sociology in Baylor's College of Arts & Sciences. He is lead author of the study, "Is Being 'Spiritual' Enough Without Being Religious? A Study of Violent and Property Crimes Among Emerging Adults."

He noted that until the 20th century, the terms "religious" and "spiritual" were treated as interchangeable.

Previous research indicated that people who say they are religious show lower levels of crime and deviance, which refers to norm-violating behavior.

The researchers analyzed data from a sample of 14,322 individuals from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. They ranged in age from 18 to 28, with an average age of 21.8.

In the confidential survey, participants were asked how often they had committed crimes in the previous 12 months—including violent crimes such as physical fights or armed robbery—while property crimes included vandalism, theft and burglary.

Past research shows that people who report themselves as spiritual make up about 10 percent of the general population, Jang said.

"Calling oneself 'spiritual but not religious' turned out to more of an antisocial characteristic, unlike identifying oneself as religious," said Baylor researcher Aaron Franzen, a doctoral candidate and study co-author.

In their study, the Baylor researchers hypothesized that those who are spiritual but not religious would be less conventional than the religious group—but could be either more or less conventional than the "neither" group.

"We were thinking that religious people would have an institutional and communal attachment and investment, while the spiritual people would have more of an independent identity," Franzen said.

Theories for why religious people are less likely to commit crime are that they fear "supernatural sanctions" as well as criminal punishment and feel shame about deviance; are bonded to conventional society; exercise high self-control in part because of parents who also are likely to be religious; and associate with peers who reinforce their behavior and beliefs.

Significantly, people who are spiritual but not religious tend to have lower self-control than those who are religious. They also are more likely to experience such strains as criminal victimization and such negative emotions as depression and anxiety. They also are more likely to have peers who use and abuse alcohol, Franzen said. Those factors are predictors of criminal behavior.

"It's a challenge in terms of research to know what that actually means to be spiritual, because they self-identify," he said. "But they are different in some way, as our study shows."

In their research, included four categories based on how the reported themselves. Those categories and percentages were:

  • Spiritual but not religious, 11.5 percent
  • Religious but not spiritual, 6.8 percent
  • Both spiritual and religious, 37.9 percent
  • Neither spiritual nor religious, 43.8 percent

Explore further: Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Parents, religion guard against college drinking

Mar 05, 2013

Religious college students report less alcohol use than their classmates – and the reason may have to do with how their parents handle stress, according to new research by a Michigan State University scholar.

How spirituality induces liberal attitudes

Mar 01, 2013

(Phys.org) —People become more politically liberal immediately after practising a spiritual exercise such as meditation, researchers at the University of Toronto have found.

Recommended for you

Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

18 hours ago

When asked who is going to win an election, people tend to predict their own candidate will come out on top. When that doesn't happen, according to a new study from the University of Georgia, these "surprised losers" often ...

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

Jul 23, 2014

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

Jul 23, 2014

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
not rated yet Jun 12, 2013
Well geez. It's all about the peers.
RobertKarlStonjek
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 12, 2013
The study may show that those who adhere to a religion are less likely to admit to criminal behaviour. The reason is group solidarity: they do not want to let the group down or give it a bad reputation by both admitting they are part of that group AND deviant.

There is no such motivation for the spiritual individuals as they are all independent and feel no group pressure nor any motivation to support the image of their group.
rwinners
not rated yet Jun 13, 2013
The study may show that those who adhere to a religion are less likely to admit to criminal behaviour. The reason is group solidarity: they do not want to let the group down or give it a bad reputation by both admitting they are part of that group AND deviant.

There is no such motivation for the spiritual individuals as they are all independent and feel no group pressure nor any motivation to support the image of their group.


Well geez.. isn't that what I said?