Scientists find new source of versatility so 'floppy' proteins can get things done

Jun 19, 2013
The Scripps Research Institute's Peter Wright (left back), Ashok Deniz (right back), Josephine Ferreon (front left) and Allan Chris Ferreon are authors of the new Nature paper. Credit: The Scripps Research Institute.

Many proteins work like Swiss Army knives, fitting multiple functions into their elaborately folded structures. A bit mysteriously, some proteins manage to multitask even with structures that are unfolded and floppy—"intrinsically disordered." In this week's issue of Nature, scientists at The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) report their discovery of an important trick that a well-known intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) uses to expand and control its functionality.

"We've found what is probably a general mechanism by which IDPs modulate their activities," said TSRI Professor Peter E. Wright, who is Cecil H. and Ida M. Green Investigator in and member of TSRI's Skaggs Institute for . Wright was a senior investigator for the study, along with TSRI Associate Professor Ashok A. Deniz.

The study focused on an IDP known as the adenovirus "early region 1A oncoprotein" (E1A). An adenovirus starts producing copies of E1A shortly after it infects a cell. E1A proteins interact with a variety of key cellular molecules to quickly subvert the cell's replication machinery for the benefit of the virus.

Links to Disease

E1A is worth studying not just because it facilitates adenovirus infections, but also because it's a prime example of an IDP. Such proteins frequently play outsized roles in cells, as crucial "molecular hubs" within very large -. IDPs also include proteins that are linked to major diseases, including the tumor suppressor , the protein of Parkinson's disease, and the amyloid beta and of Alzheimer's disease.

The simple, flexible structures of IDPs are often promiscuously "sticky," which in principle explains why they would have multiple molecular partners. But IDPs don't connect willy-nilly with other proteins, and scientists have wondered how they regulate their diverse interactions.

Wright's laboratory and others have been studying these interactions using a technique called nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. However, E1A's intrinsic stickiness means that it tends to aggregate at NMR-friendly concentrations, rendering this method of analysis problematic. (Most proteins, by folding up into complex shapes, effectively cloak their stickier bits.)

A Sensitive Technique

For the new study, Wright and his colleagues turned to Deniz, whose laboratory specializes in the use of sensitive, cutting-edge techniques to study the dynamics of disordered proteins and other biological molecules. One of these techniques, a quantum optics method known as single-molecule FRET, uses a tiny fluorescent beacon system to register distances between selected parts of a protein. In effect, this allows investigators to monitor in real time the shape-changes of E1A—characterized by Wright's laboratory in earlier work—which mark its rapid couplings and uncouplings with other proteins.

"The technique is sensitive enough that we can use it at extremely low protein concentrations, even focusing on single E1A proteins to avoid the loss of information that comes from the usual averaging of results over multiple proteins," Deniz said.

Postdoctoral fellows Allan Chris M. Ferreon and Josephine C. Ferreon, in the Deniz and Wright laboratories, respectively, used the single-molecule FRET method to detail the strengths ("affinities") with which E1A binds to two of its most important protein partners. By mapping how these binding affinities change under different conditions, they were able to obtain key insights into how E1A manages its multiple interactions.

Achieving Complexity

First, like many folded proteins, E1A turns out to employ a basic regulatory mechanism called allostery: when one protein partner binds at one part of the E1A structure, it changes the ability of the other major binding site on E1A to bind other partners.

For most proteins that use allostery, this change makes partner-binding at the other site more likely ("positive cooperativity"). For a minority, it makes partner-binding at the other site less likely ("negative cooperativity"). But E1A turns out to have the capacity for either positive cooperativity or negative cooperativity between its two major binding regions—depending on whether a third part of the protein is occupied. "Allostery itself is a mechanism for modulating a protein's functions, and here we show that E1A takes it to another level by modulating allostery—modulating the modulation, in effect," said Josephine Ferreon.

The finding helps explain how E1A generates and manages its functional complexity—a complexity that for viral proteins seems particularly necessary, considering how tiny viral genomes are in comparison to those of their animal hosts. Moreover, some of E1A's key binding partners in infected cells are themselves hub-type IDPs. "So now you multiply the complexity—and you can see how proteins such as E1A manage to achieve so much so quickly within a cell," said Allan Ferreon.

Wright regards the study as the start of a rewarding line of investigation using sensitive techniques such as single-molecule FRET. "The fact that we can get around the usual technical obstacles relating to IDPs and do these single-molecule experiments really opens up the study of IDP hub interactions," he said.

Deniz concludes, "We're definitely going to be studying more of these hub proteins, and I think we're going to discover other fundamental principles by which they achieve complex layers of biological regulation and function."

Explore further: How plant cell compartments change with cell growth

More information: "Modulation of allostery by protein intrinsic disorder" doi:10.1038/nature12294

Related Stories

New methodology for the analysis of proteins

Apr 05, 2013

A study led by the professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the Faculty of Chemistry of the UB Modesto Orozco, and by Xavier Salvatella, from the Department of Biochemistry, both ICREA scientists ...

Protein recognition and disorder: A debate

Jan 11, 2013

The extent to which three-dimensional structure is required for protein recognition and function is an area of vigorous debate with clear implications for protein engineering. Two differing viewpoints have been put forward ...

Common 'chaperone' protein found to work in surprising way

Apr 03, 2011

In the constantly morphing field of protein structure, scientists at The Scripps Research Institute offer yet another surprise: a common "chaperone" protein in cells thought to help other proteins fold has been shown instead ...

Recommended for you

How plant cell compartments change with cell growth

Aug 22, 2014

A research team led by Kiminori Toyooka from the RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science has developed a sophisticated microscopy technique that for the first time captures the detailed movement of ...

Plants can 'switch off' virus DNA

Aug 22, 2014

A team of virologists and plant geneticists at Wageningen UR has demonstrated that when tomato plants contain Ty-1 resistance to the important Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), parts of the virus DNA ...

A better understanding of cell to cell communication

Aug 22, 2014

Researchers of the ISREC Institute at the School of Life Sciences, EPFL, have deciphered the mechanism whereby some microRNAs are retained in the cell while others are secreted and delivered to neighboring ...

A glimpse at the rings that make cell division possible

Aug 22, 2014

Forming like a blown smoke ring does, a "contractile ring" similar to a tiny muscle pinches yeast cells in two. The division of cells makes life possible, but the actual mechanics of this fundamental process ...

User comments : 0