Global netizens see worrying trend in US spying

Jun 08, 2013 by Jack Chang
In this Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2011, file photo, a Facebook User Operations Safety Team worker looks at reviews at Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. The Washington Post and The Guardian reported Thursday, June 6, 2013, the existence of a program used by the NSA and FBI that scours the nation's main Internet companies, extracting audio, video, photographs, emails, documents and connection logs to help analysts track a person's movements and contacts. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

Revelations that the U.S. government has been snooping on Internet users worldwide failed to shock global netizens, who say they've already given up on expectations of online privacy in the face of growing surveillance from governments and private companies.

From London to Quito, Ecuador, Web users said they already carefully limit the information they include in emails or post on social networks such as Facebook. Many also said they had already assumed governments were regularly spying on online activity as part of counter-terrorism efforts.

"It doesn't surprise me one bit. They've been doing it for years," said Jamie Griffiths, a 26-year-old architect working on his laptop in a London cafe. "I wouldn't send anything via email that I wouldn't want a third party to read."

Still, some said they were outraged that their privacy had been violated.

"The American government has no right to read or intercept any messages I send on Facebook," said 15-year-old Julio Fernandes, of Sao Paulo, as he thumbed the keyboard of his smartphone. "This will probably change how I use the Internet. I imagine it will for many Brazilians."

According to a U.N. report released this week, governments worldwide have increasingly been tapping into online personal data.

Leaked show the U.S. and the FBI have been sifting through the personal data of people worldwide by directly accessing the servers of , , Microsoft, Google, , , PalTalk and . U.S. President said Friday that the surveillance didn't apply to U.S. citizens or others living in the U.S.

"I think the American government has always collaborated with these companies, and for me it's not so strange," said Angui Moussa, a community manager for a website and social media firm in the . "The threat that the American government fights everyday—they use many means at the security level to make profiles of those who might threaten them."

The governments of China, Bahrain and other nations already aggressively oversee online activity, in many cases putting people in prison for political blog posts and other messages.

Israel's attorney general in April upheld a practice allowing security personnel to read email accounts of suspicious individuals when they arrive at the airport, arguing it prevents militants from entering the country.

The U.N. report said such activity has been expanding as technology advances, and that countries should prioritize protecting people's online rights.

"In order to meet their human rights obligations, States must ensure that the rights to freedom of expression and privacy are at the heart of their communications surveillance frameworks," the report reads.

For Hernan Rodriguez, who heads a top Ecuadorean government technology project, the recent case shows Internet users worldwide are especially vulnerable to U.S. government surveillance since many of the servers used by globally popular tech companies sit on U.S. territory.

"This happens because of the technological dependency that we have maintained in the countries of the south, of not having the real capacity to keep our own servers for critical information and safeguard the privacy of every citizen," Rodriguez said.

Explore further: Individual privacy versus digital driftnets

Related Stories

Facebook joins Web freedom group

May 22, 2013

Facebook on Wednesday became a full member of the Global Network Initiative, a non-governmental organization promoting Internet freedom and privacy rights.

Push for US Internet 'wiretap' law faces tough road

Jun 02, 2013

The FBI is stepping up its effort to get broader authority to put "wiretaps" on the Internet to catch criminals and terrorists. But the move is drawing fire from civil liberties groups, technology firms and others who claim ...

Recommended for you

Individual privacy versus digital driftnets

56 minutes ago

The great irony of the Abbott government's plan enforce the mandatory data retention legislation is that while this is being done to make us safer, in fact it creates new data security risks for us all.

Meerkat vs. Periscope: Live-streaming app battle & buzz

Mar 27, 2015

Download Periscope, Twitter's just-launched live video-streaming app, and you'll find people broadcasting all sorts of mundane stuff: waiting for AT&T to fix their wiring, getting out of bed in Silicon V ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.