Europe's online surveillance still less than US

Jun 11, 2013
A staff member works on the Deutsche Telekom at the IFA trade fair in Berlin last August. European governments' ability to monitor citizens' online activity on security grounds has increased significantly in recent years.

European governments' ability to monitor citizens' online activity on security grounds has increased significantly in recent years.

But the scale of surveillance remains limited compared to what has been happening in the United States and is generally subject to strict controls, officials say.

Under a directive approved by the 27-member in 2006, and internet service providers are obliged to retain records of users' calls and online activity for at least six months.

The directive enables security services, if necessary, to check who has been communicating with whom, from where, at what time and for how long but stops short of enabling them to check the content of any communications.

The European legislation, approved in the aftermath of bombings in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005, is intended to establish a minimum standard across the bloc.

But individual governments are free to require longer periods of by , some of whom have complained loudly about the additional costs involved.

In Italy, for example, the requirement has been four years for some time while the likes of Germany and Finland had no legislation in this area prior to the EU directive being adopted.

The underlying principle of the directive is that governments can only request the information on the grounds of reasonable suspicion of activity linked to either terrorism or organised crime.

Women try out Deutsche Telekom's PagePlace eBook reader app at the Leipzig Book Fair in March last year. Under a directive approved by the 27-member European Union in 2006, telecommunications operators and internet service providers are obliged to retain records of users' calls and online activity for at least six months.

The actual process involved in authorising checks on the data covered by the EU directive and whether can go beyond it to check the content of emails etc., depends on each government.

In Britain, police can identify who has made a telephone call or sent a , and when and where.

However they cannot do the same for email, Internet, or other such as , and the police and security services say they need the power to do so in order to combat terrorism effectively.

Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative party agree but draft legislation on the issue has been blocked by their coalition partners, the Liberal Democrats, amid fears it would become a "snoopers' charter".

Although the bill would have given police access to all online communication in Britain, they would still have had to seek a warrant from a government minister to check the content of conversations and messages.

Spain is moving in a similar direction with the government currently working on reforms to the penal code which will allow police to install spy software on individuals computers on the authorisation of a judge.

The reform is only at the proposal stage at the moment but, to date, the issue has not caused much controversy.

In Germany, security services are able to check the nature and content of all digital communications under legislation dating from 2002 and updated in 2008.

As in Spain, officers have to go to court and convince a judge that the security concern involved is sufficiently important for the right to privacy of the individuals targeted to be overridden.

In France, an examining magistrate in charge of a criminal case can require internet service providers to hand over records of communications they are required to keep for a year.

Legislation also provides for access to certain sites to be blocked and for spyware to be installed on computers to keep tabs on individuals suspected of involvement in terrorism, but also paedophilia, murder, torture, arms trafficking or the drugs trade.

Access to the content of messages is only permitted, with judicial approval, in exceptional circumstances within the framework of investigations concerning national security, terrorism or organised crime.

Explore further: US Congress decriminalizes cellphone unlocking

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

UK gov't told to rethink data surveillance plan

Dec 11, 2012

(AP)—British lawmakers on Tuesday demanded the government water down plans to keep track of phone calls, email and Internet activity—a bill critics dub a "snooper's charter."

British PM faces backlash over 'snooping' plans

Apr 02, 2012

British Prime Minister David Cameron is facing a growing backlash from within his own party over plans to extend the government's powers to monitor people's email exchanges and website visits. ...

EU wants privacy guarantees from US amid Prism crisis

Jun 11, 2013

The EU said Tuesday it will seek a strong commitment from the United States to respect the rights of European citizens, following revelations that Washington is running a worldwide Internet surveillance programme.

UK: Surveillance devices to monitor Web traffic (Update)

Feb 05, 2013

The U.K. plans to install an unspecified number of spy devices along the country's telecommunications network to monitor Britons' use of overseas services such as Facebook and Twitter, according to a report published Tuesday ...

UK deputy leader: Surveillance bill won't happen

Apr 25, 2013

A mass Internet monitoring program touted by Britain's government as a terror-fighting tool is unworkable, the country's deputy leader said Thursday, vowing that it would not become law.

Recommended for you

Scalping can raise ticket prices

11 hours ago

Scalping gets a bad rap. For years, artists and concert promoters have stigmatized ticket resale as a practice that unfairly hurts their own sales and forces fans to pay exorbitant prices for tickets to sold-out concerts. ...

Study shows role of media in sharing life events

Jul 24, 2014

To share is human. And the means to share personal news—good and bad—have exploded over the last decade, particularly social media and texting. But until now, all research about what is known as "social sharing," or the ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

krundoloss
not rated yet Jun 11, 2013
If the government wants to tell them how much data to keep, why dont they subsidize the required expense?