Making a case for transparent corporate accounting information

Jun 17, 2013

A new study by accounting professor Yaniv Konchitchki finds greater transparency in firms' earnings has a positive effect on the bottom line.

"Cost of Capital and Earnings Transparency," (published in the Journal of Accounting and Economics, April-May 2013) establishes that the transparency of a firm's earnings is a telling indicator of the company's cost of capital and thus its valuation, according to Konchitchki. The paper is co-authored with Mary E. Barth, Stanford Graduate School of Business, and Wayne R. Landsman, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Kenan-Flagler Business School.

Cost of capital is defined as the rate of return that capital could be expected to earn in an alternative investment of equivalent risk. It is used to evaluate new projects within a company to give investors and assurance of a minimum return for providing capital.

The paper, says Konchitchki, has the potential to change how capital market participants consider the quality of accounting data from corporate financial statements because the findings illuminate the importance of transparency for stock valuation. "Our findings are especially notable today, when these market participants are concerned with accounting financial statements becoming less transparent and thus less useful," says Konchitchki. "In fact, many blame corporations' lack of accounting transparency for the recent financial crisis in the U.S. and the recession that followed."

A firm's valuation is often determined by discounting future cash flows by the firm's cost of capital, Konchitchki explains. The study finds that the cost of capital is negatively related to transparency. Intuitively, when there is less earnings transparency, the risk to investors is higher, resulting in higher cost of capital. Likewise, if there is more earnings transparency, one has access to more information about a company's value by observing its earnings, resulting in lower risk and, in turn, lower cost of capital. Ultimately, lower cost of capital equates to higher firm value.

Konchitchki says the study's conclusion becomes clearer by observing the calculations: the cost of capital is the important denominator when calculating a company's value. If future cash flows provided by the investment are divided by the cost of capital, the result equals the value of the investment, i.e., the firm value.

Konchitchki, assistant professor, Haas Accounting Group, specializes in capital markets research and analysis. He particularly examines the usefulness of accounting information through its links to macroeconomics (e.g., inflation; GDP) and valuation (e.g., cost of capital; asset pricing).

The researchers studied a sample of publicly traded U.S. companies over a 27-year period. They tested their hypothesis that transparency affects a firm's value by modeling how the cost of capital changes dependent on the lack or abundance of information. They considered "transparency" on a range from zero percent to 100 percent whereas categories of information may include sales, growth, management quality, global offices, cost of goods sold, etc. For example, 100 percent earnings transparency means that accounting earnings offer the ability to fully explain changes in a firm's value. Lower percentages of transparency means more information than earnings is needed to explain changes in a firm's value.

Konchitchki refers to the economic mechanism that drives the link between transparency and cost of capital as the "information asymmetry" effect.

"When the amount of available information is not symmetrical, some investors will have more information, others will have less. This drives the significant negative relation between earnings transparency and the cost of capital, and thus our paper also provides the economic intuition that links between transparency and valuation," says Konchitchki.

Explore further: Fear of losing money, not spending habits, affects investor risk tolerance, study finds

More information: See full paper at: haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/pape… hki_transparency.pdf

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NREL launches initiative to build solar performance database

Apr 09, 2013

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has launched an initiative to build an open-source database of real-world performance from solar facilities across the country. As part of ...

Green firms rewarded by financial markets

May 29, 2008

When a company improves its environmental performance, it is common to think that the accompanying economic improvements are based on the company's more efficient use of resources. However,

Recommended for you

Narcissistic CEOs and financial performance

Jul 24, 2014

Narcissism, considered by some as the "dark side of the executive personality," may actually be a good thing when it comes to certain financial measures, with companies led by narcissistic CEOs outperforming those helmed ...

Drugmaker GSK slashes annual profits forecast

Jul 23, 2014

British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline on Wednesday slashed its 2014 profits forecast as second-quarter earnings sank on the back of weak US trade, adverse currency moves and a Chinese bribery probe.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

geokstr
1 / 5 (1) Jun 17, 2013
Gosh, some "professor" should do a study advocating more transparency in government, particularly the current administration.

As for accounting, governmental accounting is loaded with mathmagics, feints, shucking and jiving, fakery, misdirection, and 2+2 equals whatever you want it to be. If corporations used the same accounting methods as government, the officers and the board of directors would all be serving life sentences at hard labor.

Full disclosure: I'm a CPA with 35 years of accounting, finance, auditing, and reporting at major corporations.