Canada's westernmost province rejects pipeline to Pacific

Jun 01, 2013
The Syncrude oil sands extraction facility is seen in Alberta Province, Canada on October 22, 2009. Canada's westernmost British Columbia province on Friday rejected a proposed pipeline to move crude from the oil sands of Alberta province to the Pacific coast, citing environmental concerns.

Canada's westernmost British Columbia province on Friday rejected a proposed pipeline to move crude from the oil sands of Alberta province to the Pacific coast, citing environmental concerns.

In a written submission to a federal review panel, British Columbia said it could not support Enbridge Inc's Northern Gateway pipeline.

Key questions about the pipeline route and how Enbridge would respond to spills remained unanswered, the document read.

"Our government does not believe that a certificate should be granted before these important questions are answered," provincial Environment Minister Terry Lake said in a statement.

He noted, however, that the government's position on the Northern Gateway is not a rejection of all heavy-oil projects, saying each "will be judged on their merits."

The Northern Gateway pipeline would move oil from the tar sands of neighboring Alberta to a new marine terminal in Kitimat, British Columbia, for shipping to Asia.

Up to 220 supertankers a year would dock at Kitimat to fill up on crude, one report estimated.

Aboriginals and environmentalists however oppose the terminal, saying tanker traffic poses risks to a pristine coastline that includes salmon-bearing rivers and the habitat of a rare white bear.

The plan gained momentum after the United States initially rejected TransCanada's Keystone XL connecting the Alberta tar sands to Texas refineries.

The US State Department is expected to make a final recommendation on the Keystone project to President in the coming months.

A panel reviewing the Northern Gateway project will wrap up hearings in June, and a decision on the project is expected at the end of the year.

Explore further: Study assesses the environmental costs and benefits of fracking

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US House sends message on Keystone pipeline

May 23, 2013

US lawmakers agreed to a bill that would speed construction of a Canada-US oil pipeline and circumvent the need for President Barack Obama's approval for the $5 billion project.

Most in US, Canada support Keystone pipeline

Apr 22, 2013

A majority of both Americans and Canadians support the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline to funnel oil from Alberta's tar sands to Texas refineries, according to polls Monday.

Arkansas opens probe into ExxonMobil spill

Apr 02, 2013

Arkansas opened an investigation into an ExxonMobil pipeline that spilled thousands of gallons of crude and forced the evacuation of two dozen homes, the state's attorney general said Tuesday.

Stage set for battle over Canada-US pipeline

Apr 18, 2013

A lengthy battle over the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which aims to funnel oil from Canada's tar sands to coastal Texas, heads to the most hotly contested area along the route Thursday.

US to hold Keystone pipeline hearing in Nebraska

Mar 27, 2013

The US State Department said Wednesday it will hold a public meeting in Nebraska in April on a controversial $5.3 billion Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline, just days before a key consultation period ends.

Recommended for you

Putting a value on what nature does for us

Sep 12, 2014

A new online resource, developed by researchers at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with other organisations based in Cambridge, helps those in both the public and private sector see how changes ...

Lessons for saving our forests

Sep 12, 2014

In late July, UC Berkeley fire ecologist Scott Stephens was working in Stanislaus National Forest, gathering data on how a century had altered its character. What he saw were the signs of a clear and present ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Neinsense99
3 / 5 (10) Jun 01, 2013
"Canada's westernmost British Columbia province" Who knew it had other British Columbias that are not so far west?
gopher65
not rated yet Jun 02, 2013
"Canada's westernmost British Columbia province" Who knew it had other British Columbias that are not so far west?

Hahaha:). AFP is an easy target though. Their grasp of Engrish is mediocre at best.
TheGhostofOtto1923
3.7 / 5 (6) Jun 02, 2013
Many pipeline projects are being cancelled.

"Railroads are moving massive amounts of crude oil from wells to refineries, The Wall Street Journal reports. Those who buy oil prefer the flexibility of trains. The trend is leaving pipeline companies in the lurch, leading to cancellation or delays of new pipeline projects."

Pipelines are permanent. Railroads already exist and can be retasked as LENR begins replacing fossil fuels. This is speculation mind you.

The price of petrol has jumped 50 cents in the Midwest in the last day or 2, supposedly because of problems at ONE refinery. Why build more?
Neinsense99
3.3 / 5 (7) Jun 26, 2013
Many pipeline projects are being cancelled.

"Railroads are moving massive amounts of crude oil from wells to refineries, The Wall Street Journal reports. Those who buy oil prefer the flexibility of trains. The trend is leaving pipeline companies in the lurch, leading to cancellation or delays of new pipeline projects."

Pipelines are permanent. Railroads already exist and can be retasked as LENR begins replacing fossil fuels. This is speculation mind you.

The price of petrol has jumped 50 cents in the Midwest in the last day or 2, supposedly because of problems at ONE refinery. Why build more?

The recent spate of derailments is why not build more.