Apple says proof of antitrust conspiracy weak

Jun 20, 2013 by John Biers
A fair goer tries out the an e-book reader app on an Apple iPad at the Leipzig Book Fair on March 15, 2012. Evidence is lacking of an Apple conspiracy with publishers to raise the price of e-books, Apple's lawyer said in closing remarks Thursday in a federal antitrust trial.

Evidence is lacking of an Apple conspiracy with publishers to raise the price of e-books, Apple's lawyer said in closing remarks Thursday in a federal antitrust trial.

"The government has overreached," said attorney Orin Snyder said at the federal court trial in New York. "Any fair consideration leads to one conclusion: Apple acted lawfully and did not violate the ."

Snyder described the intense six-week period during which Apple introduced itself to the publishing world, then negotiated a series of contracts with five major publishers that remade the online book industry.

The government contends that Apple conspired with the publishers to change the e-book selling model in early 2010. At the time, the industry was run on a "wholesale" model dominated by Amazon, which set bestsellers at $9.99.

Apple shifted the system to an agency model that guaranteed Apple a 30 percent commission, let publishers set prices and priced most bestsellers at $12.99 and $14.99. As Apple was finalizing its deals, publishers successfully pressured Amazon to accept the agency model and higher prices.

The government alleges Apple was the "ringleader" of a conspiracy that organized the industry against Amazon in a way that cost consumers hundreds of millions of dollars.

But Snyder accused the government of "taking benign commercial conduct and turning it into the seeds of a conspiracy."

The government has contended that Apple began plotting higher prices in late 2009 with conversations with publishers on the agency model. But these conversations were early brainstorming sessions, not a meeting of the minds on a way to remake the industry, Snyder said.

Snyder pointed out that Apple's leading negotiator Eddy Cue had almost no phone contact with the publishers in between late December and around January 20, 2010 when the talks intensified ahead of the iPad launch.

"There is no such thing as conspiracy by telepathy," Snyder said.

Snyder pointed to evidence that showed Apple grappling with several different concepts for entering the e-book market before settling on a plan.

Apple initially proposed, but soon discarded a plan requiring to shift all their retailers to the agency model. The government has maintained that Apple never gave up the plan.

But Snyder pointed to evidence that undermined this "secret deal" argument: a written statement from a Random House executive recounting Apple's assurances that the publisher could remain on wholesale terms with Amazon if it signed agency with Apple.

Snyder warned that a finding against Apple, a new entrant in a sector dominated by Amazon, would be "unprecedented and dangerous."

The case is being closely watched by the business sector, Snyder said.

A ruling against "would have a chilling and confounding effect" on content companies looking to enter new technology businesses, Snyder said.

The was set to present closing arguments later in the day.

Explore further: Google buys special effects technology firm Zync

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Apple exec challenges e-book conspiracy

Jun 17, 2013

A top Apple executive downplayed the theory of an e-book price-fixing conspiracy at an antitrust trial Monday, saying publishers were already moving away from Amazon's model when Apple launched its iPad.

Mysterious Steve Jobs emails hang over Apple trial

Jun 18, 2013

The late Steve Jobs took center stage Monday in the latest twist in the Apple antitrust trial on ebooks. A federal court attempted to plumb the meaning of a series of unsent emails Jobs addressed to Eddy Cue, an Apple senior ...

Apple clashes with Amazon in e-book case

Jun 07, 2013

Apple attorneys in the US antitrust case on e-books went on the offensive, attacking the credibility of government witnesses and seeking to debunk key elements of the government's case.

Recommended for you

Hackerspaces used to turn ideas turn into reality

8 hours ago

At HeatSync Labs, the tables are littered with computer chips, pens, pads and tools while the room is abuzz with the chatter of would-be inventors hoping to change the world—or just make cool things. They are part of a ...

China Telecom profit rises as mobile data grows

8 hours ago

China Telecom Ltd., one of the country's three main state-owned carriers, said Wednesday its profit rose 11.8 percent in the first half of the year as its Internet and mobile data businesses grew.

Snapchat valued at $10 bln

9 hours ago

US media on Tuesday reported that Snapchat was valued at $10 billion based on funding pumped into the startup by a powerhouse Silicon Valley venture capital firm.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

VENDItardE
2 / 5 (4) Jun 20, 2013
GUILTY......beyond a doubt
packrat
1 / 5 (2) Jun 20, 2013
It's called greed.... Same reason Apple charges so much more for their electronics than anyone else does for the same capability. There is NO reason any ebook should cost more than a paperback or hardbound version of the same book.