In its second quarterly report of 2013, the UCLA Anderson Forecast says that despite the United States' "improvement in both GDP and key economic sectors, the overall growth falls short of the rates required for the national economy to truly recover from the most recent recession."
In California, the outlook differs little from last quarter, adjusted only to reflect the most current data. The factors driving California employment and income growth to rates higher than the U.S. remain. As the global economy improves with greater investment in the U.S., the state will again benefit from a disproportionate share of the improvement.
The national forecast
In his June report, UCLA Anderson Forecast director Edward Leamer writes that despite the positive growth in gross domestic product and in key economic sectors, the U.S. is not in recovery, as growth falls far short of the levels needed to bring the economy back to trend.
"U.S. real GDP is now 15.4 percent below the normal 3 percent trend," Leamer writes. "To get back to that 3 percent trend, we would need 4 percent growth for 15 years, or 5 percent growth for eight years, or 6 percent growth for five years, not the disappointing twos and threes we have been racking up recently, which are moving us farther from trend, not closer to it. It's not a recovery. It's not even normal growth. It's bad."
Leamer's essay, "Great Recovery: Wherefore Are Thou," describes a paradox. Growth in GDP is positive but not exceptional. Jobs numbers are improving but not rapidly enough, and the jobs being created are not necessarily jobs that will ensure workers a secure future. Meanwhile, Leamer says, the tepid growth continues to obscure the nation's most fundamental problems: too much government spending funded with too much borrowing, too little national savings to cover late-in-life health care issues and too many workers lacking the skills to compete in the modern economy.
Despite the problems, the current forecast is slightly better than those of the recent past, and 2015 is expected to be better than 2014, with real GDP edging up to 3 percent. Fed funds, the U.S. overnight inter-bank lending rate, will remain near zero as a continuing dose of monetary medicine. The unemployment rate will fall to 6.6 percent by 2015, due in part to a growing base of discouraged workers.
Leamer also writes that the "genuinely good news is that we are in the early stages of a real recovery in housing. Housing starts, which fell to a historic low of 550,000 in 2009, will climb back to the normal 1.5 million by 2015."
In a companion piece, David Shulman, a senior economist with UCLA Anderson Forecast and the UCLA Ziman Center for Real Estate, takes a closer look at the housing recovery. "Home prices are rising and housing starts have approximately doubled from their depression lows of a few years ago," he writes.
Shulman's forecast says that housing starts will reach a run rate of 1.6 million units by mid-2015 and home prices will continue to rise. Specifically, housing starts are expected to increase from the 782,000 units recorded in 2012 to 1.03 million in 2013 and 1.35 million in 2014, reaching 1.56 million by 2015. Multi-family housing starts will continue to rise, with an excess of 400,000 units a year being started in both 2014 and 2015.
The California forecast
The California forecast report by senior economist Jerry Nickelsburg notes that California continues to lead the measured growth seen in the national economy, a trend consistent over the past four years, since the end of the recent recession. The difference at this point lies in the construction sector. "As job gains accumulate, household formation rates increase and the demand for housing, finally, is generating new residential construction," he writes.
Nickelsburg says the state has been one of the bright spots in the U.S. employment picture, with California consistently among the top 10 states in employment growth. For the 12 months ending in April 2013, only Utah's employment growth rate rose faster. While the increase in California jobs has been widespread, the economy's strength lies in the state's technology and knowledge-laden sectors, which use technology and information more heavily, accounting for more than half the job growth.
The forecast for 2013 is for total employment growth (payroll, farm and self-employed) of 2.6 percent, and 2.1 percent in 2014 and 2015. Non-farm employment will grow more slowly, at 2 percent in both 2013 and 2014 and 2.2 percent in 2015. Real personal income growth is forecast to be 2.3 percent in 2013, followed by 3.5 percent in 2014 and 3.3 percent in 2015. Unemployment will fall through 2013 and will average approximately 9.1 percent for this year. In 2014, the Anderson Forecast expects the unemployment rate to drop to 8.1 percent, and then to 7.1 percent.
In addition to the forecast reports, UCLA Anderson Forecast economist William Yu publishes an essay on housing prices, with his research focusing on the fundamental factors that predict the long-term home-price appreciation in a city. Yu writes that from 1995 through 2012, there has been a wide disparity of home-price growth across cities. He cites five determinants to explain price appreciation, including home supply, economic growth, geographic constraints, human capital and ocean amenities.
"L.A. has a relatively low supply of homes, considering its population and economic growth, compared to most other cities," Yu writes. His research suggests that a reduction in unnecessary regulation barriers and a more widespread public transportation system would result in a greater supply of homes, especially multi-family homes, which will help relieve the housing affordability problem in Los Angeles.
Explore further: UCLA Anderson Forecast predicts 'very sluggish growth' accompanied by high unemployment