Masked donors: New study reveals why people make large donations anonymously

May 21, 2013
Masked donors: new study reveals why people make large donations anonymously

New research that studied why people choose to make large donations to charity anonymously has found that it may act as a signal to other donors of the charity's quality. The findings, published today, also show that anonymous gifts rather than public ones induce larger donations from subsequent donors.

Researchers from the University of Bristol's Centre for Market and Public Organisation, studied the anonymous gifts from 70,000 donations made through the Virgin Money Giving website to fundraisers running in the 2010 London Marathon—the biggest single fundraising event in the world.

The team found that anonymous donations made on behalf of runners in the London Marathon account for the majority of larger gifts than public ones. Furthermore, anonymous gifts rather than public ones induce larger donations from subsequent donors who give around four per cent more. The findings also reveal that early donations are more likely to be anonymous than later ones, particularly for the first to a fundraising page.

However, the researchers indicate that the reason why a person may choose to show the amount they have donated but conceal their identity is because it may act as a signal informing others looking to donate of the charity's quality and worthiness. Knowing this to be the case, a who wishes to see the charity succeed may intentionally choose to keep their identity private.

Michael Sanders, one of the authors, said: "Current on the reasons behind anonymous is limited. Our findings indicate that actually a large anonymous gift is viewed by other donors to the 's worthiness. A recent example of this type of phenomenon is the anonymous donation of $200 million to Baylor University in Texas – the largest donation in the University's history – which acted as a signal of prestige for the organisation to other potential donors."

The paper is titled "Masked Heroes: endogenous in charitable giving."

Explore further: Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Survey: Most Haiti text donors have given since

Jan 12, 2012

(AP) -- The massive earthquake that devastated Haiti two years ago prompted an outpouring of charitable donations and propelled a new way of giving - through text messages - into the public eye.

Recommended for you

Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

15 hours ago

When asked who is going to win an election, people tend to predict their own candidate will come out on top. When that doesn't happen, according to a new study from the University of Georgia, these "surprised losers" often ...

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

Jul 23, 2014

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

Jul 23, 2014

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

EyeNStein
1 / 5 (3) May 21, 2013
I would prefer anonymity so that I don't get a years worth of spam e-mail for each donation.
Some charities work is very worthwhile, but their fundraising efforts get worse than 'readers digest' once they get your contact details.