French panel moots taxes on smartphones, tablets

May 13, 2013
A woman uses her smartphone in Bordeaux on May 3, 2013. A report by a French expert panel published on Monday recommended imposing taxes on smartphones and tablets but rejected a call for search engine Google to be charged for linking to media content.

A report by a French expert panel published on Monday recommended imposing taxes on smartphones and tablets but rejected a call for search engine Google to be charged for linking to media content.

The nine-member panel, headed by respected journalist and businessman Pierre Lescure, said in the keenly awaited report that the revenue gained from the proposed new taxes could help fund artistic and creative ventures.

But the report said that demands for compensation from by content providers such as newspapers—which say the search giant makes significant advertising revenue from referencing their material—were legally "doubtful".

France and Germany are considering imposing compensation schemes on Google as the company has refused to reach any deal with media outlets.

The report made 75 proposals in all and called for the scrapping of the Hadopi agency created to monitor and enforce Internet copyright laws.

It said the task of fighting should instead be handled by the CSA agency, or the Higher Council for Audiovisual media, which regulates electronic media in France.

It also called for a massive scaleback in controversial punishments for piracy, saying Internet connections should no longer be suspended and fines should be slashed from a maximum of 1,500 euros ($1,950) to 60 euros, which could be then raised for repeat offenders.

The report said piracy could also be contained if satellite and offered new films on demand shortly after their release.

Explore further: News Corp. to buy Move Inc. for about $950 million

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Orange 'forces Google' to pay for mobile traffic

Jan 16, 2013

The head of French telecoms operator Orange said on Wednesday it had been able to impose a deal on Google to compensate it for the vast amounts of traffic sent across its networks.

Google loses appeal against French tax searches

Nov 02, 2012

A Paris appeals court has rejected a request by Internet search giant Google to invalidate the search and seizure of documents by French tax authorities, according to a copy of the decision obtained by AFP ...

Google threatens to drop links to French media

Oct 18, 2012

Google has threatened to exclude French media sites from its search results if France implements a proposed law forcing search engines to pay for content, according to a letter obtained by AFP.

Google chief to meet French president amid pay row

Oct 27, 2012

Google's executive chairman Eric Schmidt will meet with French President Francois Hollande on Monday as the Internet giant wrangles with Paris over a bill that would force search engines to pay for content, ...

Recommended for you

What's PayPal's first solo move?

10 hours ago

PayPal's impending split from long-time partner eBay Inc. will ratchet up its appeal to online retail competitors such as Amazon.com and give it the freedom to aggressively take on new mobile pay challeng ...

AOL to feed more video, news to Microsoft's MSN

15 hours ago

AOL will provide Microsoft's MSN with more video and additional news stories from popular sites such as The Huffington Post and TechCrunch in an expansion of a deal aimed at selling more digital advertising.

Microsoft to tap $2-trillion Indian cloud market

19 hours ago

Microsoft announced plans Tuesday to offer its commercial cloud services from Indian data centres as it seeks to tap what it calls a $2-trillion market in the country where Internet use is growing rapidly.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Szkeptik
not rated yet May 13, 2013
Raising a tax in one thing, but taxing something that was never taxed before requires serious thought. People don't like having to suddenly pay for something they already paid a siginficant amount of money to buy in the first place. Would this be some kind of luxury tax or what?