Big miners' community engagement doing more harm than good?

May 21, 2013

(Phys.org) —The corporate social responsibility programs of big mining companies in remote towns are often disconnected from community needs, reactive and ad hoc.

A study by University of Melbourne researcher Dr Sara Bice has found the big miners' well-intentioned activities can have unforeseen and undesirable consequences.

"Mining companies are pumping millions of dollars into certain remote towns. But as mining booms, expand and exports increase, these communities are facing an identity crisis," said to Dr Bice, from the University's School of Social and Political Sciences.

"Communities are often given money for infrastructure or projects they don't want or need, while some organizations are becoming dangerously reliant on the ' money.

"This raises the question of whether programs to promote 'sustainability' are, themselves, sustainable?" she said.

The study, 'No more sun shades, please: Experiences of in remote Australian mining communities', appears in the current edition of the Rural Society Journal.

The research was based on an analysis of five leading Australian mining companies' reports across five years, interviews with 11 senior mining managers and the experiences of residents in two remote mining towns.

It found some in towns where multiple mining corporations maintained a presence often felt pressure to "align" with one company, while other institutions were able to "leverage companies" to achieve a greater benefit.

"The mining companies all want to be prominent in town, so certain organizations have learnt to 'play' one company off against another to garner funding or services," Dr Bice said.

"And all this is going on with extremely limited, formal or third party oversight.

"Companies and communities are in complex relationships. Many companies try to do the right thing without realizing that well-meaning CSR programs can create a troubling dependency over the long-term.

"Australia's mining companies are leaders in adopting corporate programs, but much work remains to improve their understanding of long-term community development, including making good community program choices ."

The study stops short of calling for regulation of CSR programs, but suggests companies could do more to better target and manage their own corporate responsibility expenditure.

Explore further: Research shows too much executive turnover hurts companies

More information: rsj.e-contentmanagement.com/ar… issue/2/article/5011

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Koalas and mine site restoration

Feb 13, 2013

One of the guiding principles of rehabilitating disturbed landscapes and mine sites – that if you restore their plant diversity, the animals that once lived there will return – does not always hold true, ...

Soda companies' PR campaigns are bad for health: experts

Jun 19, 2012

Health advocates need to organize strong public health campaigns to educate the public and policymakers about the dangers of both sugary beverages and the misleading industry corporate social responsibility campaigns that ...

Recommended for you

Study identifies upside to financial innovations

Aug 27, 2014

Financial innovations can make or break an economy. While the negative impact of financial innovation has been extensively covered, a new study of financial innovations before and during the last financial crisis indicates ...

Study shows social welfare may fall in a more ethical market

Aug 25, 2014

For "credence services" such as auto-repair, healthcare, and legal services, the benefit to the customers for the service is difficult to assess before and even after the service. A new study in a journal of the Institute ...

User comments : 0