A look at the world explains 90 percent of changes in vegetation

Apr 16, 2013
Climatic changes in temperature, cloud cover, precipitation and potential evaporation (1982-2008). Credit: UZH

In the last thirty years, vegetation has changed significantly the world over. Until recently, the extent to which the climate or humankind was responsible remained unclear. However, geographers from the University of Zurich and colleagues from the Netherlands now reveal that over half of these changes are climatological, humans or as yet unknown human-climate interactions cause over a third and around ten percent cannot be explained fully by either the climate or human activity.

The climate governs the seasonal activity of vegetation; humankind influences it. In the humid mid-latitudes, temperature is the largest influencing factor for . In predominantly dry areas, however, it is the availability of water and in the incident solar radiation. Without a doubt, humankind also has a modifying impact on the ecosystem. Satellites have been recording how the vegetation on the Earth's surface is changing since the 1980s. Within the last thirty years, for instance, vegetation activity has increased in the but declined in the . Until recently, it was not possible to quantify the extent to which , human activity or a combination of the two factors were responsible for this.

Relative contribution of climatic effects to the global vegetation change (1982-2011). Credit: UZH

An interdisciplinary team headed by Rogier de Jong, Michael Schaepman and mathematician Reinhard Furrer from the University of Zurich, however, has now developed a model together with Dutch colleagues that can illustrate the influences of human activity and climate variability on vegetation separately. To this end, they used on the vegetation increase or decline from the last thirty years, climate measurements and models, and data on the kind of land cover. The scientists demonstrate that around 54 percent of the changes in global vegetation activity can be attributed to climate variability.

Over 30 percent of the changes caused by human activity

"The majority of the changes – more than 30 percent overall – were caused by human activity," explains de Jong, a postdoctoral student at the University of Zurich's Remote Sensing Laboratories (RSL). Vegetation activity primarily declined south of the Sahel region, such as in Tanzania, Zimbabwe and in the Congo. "We assume that this was caused by clear cutting, the transformation of rainforest into plantations or changes in agriculture in general," explains de Jong. Around ten percent cannot be explained fully by climatology or human activity. "We suspect that this is due to unexplained effects of the interactions between humans and the climate," says Head of the RSL Michael Schaepman.

Global vegetation change, 1982-2011. Green: increase in activity; brown: decline in activity. Credit: UZH

Schaepman and his team will pursue these interactions further under the newly created research priority program "Global Change and Biodiversity" at the University of Zurich.

Explore further: First large-scale carbon capture goes online in Canada

More information: de Jong, R. et al. (2013). Spatial Relationship between Climatologies and Changes in Global Vegetation Activity. Global Change Biology. dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12193

de Jong, R. et al. (2013). Shifts in Global Vegetation Activity Trends. Remote Sensing, (5) (3), 1117-1133. dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs5031117

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Local factors important for water availability

Jul 06, 2012

An important issue that has grabbed the attention of scientists and policy makers alike is the amount of freshwater that will be available to populations across different climate settings, especially as rain belts reorganize ...

Sugarcane cools climate

Apr 17, 2011

Brazilians are world leaders in using biofuels for gasoline. About a quarter of their automobile fuel consumption comes from sugarcane, which significantly reduces carbon dioxide emissions that otherwise would be emitted ...

Arctic vegetation spread could boost climate change

Apr 10, 2013

(Phys.org) —Changes in Arctic vegetation due to climate change have probably been underestimated, according to a new computer analysis which shows that tree and shrub cover in the region will increase more ...

Climate change forces major vegetation shifts

Jun 04, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Vegetation around the world is on the move, and climate change is the culprit, according to a new analysis of global vegetation shifts led by a University of California, Berkeley, ecologist ...

Streams need trees to withstand climate change

Feb 10, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- More than twenty years of biological monitoring have confirmed the importance of vegetation for protecting Australia's freshwater streams and rivers against the ravages of drought and climate ...

Recommended for you

Report IDs 'major weaknesses' at nuclear-arms lab

3 hours ago

One of the nation's premier nuclear weapons laboratories is being called out by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Energy for "major weaknesses" in the way it packaged contaminated waste before shipping it to ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Ophelia
not rated yet Apr 16, 2013
Can someone reconcile these sentences for me?

The scientists demonstrate that around 54 percent of the changes in global vegetation activity can be attributed to climate variability.

"The majority of the changes – more than 30 percent overall – were caused by human activity," explains de Jong ...
Neinsense99
1 / 5 (3) Apr 19, 2013
The first refers to climate variability as the cause of changes in vegetation activity. The second refers to a majority of the activity changes caused by climate variability -- 30%+ of ALL changes in global vegetation activity, whether caused by climate variability or not. There is no contradiction.