On Twitter, anti-vaccination sentiments spread more easily than pro-vaccination sentiments

Apr 04, 2013 by Katrina Voss
On Twitter, a research team tracked the pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine messages about a new vaccine for combating a virus strain responsible for swine flu, and then observed how Twitter users expressed their own sentiments about the vaccine. The results may help health officials improve strategies for vaccination-awareness efforts. This image is a network diagram showing connected Twitter users expressing negative (red) and positive (green) sentiments about vaccination. Credit: Salathé lab, Penn State University

On Twitter, a popular microblogging and social-networking service, statements about vaccines may have unexpected effects—positive messages may backfire, according to a team of Penn State University researchers led by Marcel Salathé, an assistant professor of biology. The team tracked the pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine messages to which Twitter users were exposed and then observed how those users expressed their own sentiments about a new vaccine for combating influenza H1N1—a virus strain responsible for swine flu. The results, which may help health officials improve strategies for vaccination-awareness efforts, will be published in the journal EPJ Data Science on 4 April 2013.

The researchers began by amassing all tweets with vaccination-related keywords and phrases during the 2009 H1N1 . They then tracked users' sentiments about the H1N1 vaccine. To sort through and categorize the tweets, Salathé's team asked Penn State students to rate a random subset of about 10 percent and them as positive, negative, neutral, or irrelevant. For example, a tweet expressing a desire to get the H1N1 vaccine would be considered positive, while a tweet expressing the belief that the vaccine causes harm would be considered negative. A tweet concerning a different vaccine; for example, the vaccine, would be considered irrelevant.

Next, the team used the students' ratings to design a for cataloging the remaining 90 percent of the tweets according to the sentiments they expressed. "The human-rated tweets served as a 'learning set' that we used to 'teach' the computer how to rate the tweets accurately," Salathé explained. After the tweets were analyzed by the computer algorithm, the final tally was 318,379 tweets expressing either positive, negative, or neutral sentiments about the H1N1 vaccine.

After categorizing the tweets, Salathé and his team then developed a statistical model with information including the number of microbloggers each user was following. In addition, the researchers recorded whether those followed microbloggers tended to tweet negatively or positively about the H1N1 vaccine. Also included in the model was the number of the negative or positive tweets each of the followed microbloggers sent out. "How many pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine individuals a Twitter user follows is just one measure. Also important is how many negative or positive tweets each followed microblogger then broadcasts to his followers," Salathé said. "It might be that a Twitter user follows only 5 anti-vaccine microbloggers, but if those 5 microbloggers all send 10 negative tweets per day, that might have an important impact." Other measures included in the were each Twitter user's number of reciprocal users—how many pairs of microbloggers were following each other—and the history of followers' own negative and positive tweets.

The team's first unexpected finding was that exposure to negative sentiment was contagious, while exposure to positive sentiments was not. "Cause and effect are difficult to unravel in data such as these, so we can only speculate about why we saw this happen," Salathé said. "Whatever the reason, the observation is troubling because it suggests that negative opinions on vaccination may spread more easily than positive opinions."

The team's second unexpected finding was that microbloggers with more reciprocal Twitter relationships tended to be influenced differently depending on whether the vaccine sentiments of their connections were positive or negative. "We found that, in reciprocal microblogging relationships, negative sentiments were more socially contagious than positive sentiments," Salathé said. "When a microblogger had a lot of reciprocal Twitter connections with users who expressed anti-vaccine sentiments, he tended to tweet even more anti-vaccine sentiments himself." Interestingly, however, Salathé and his team found that the same did not hold true for microbloggers with reciprocal connections with users who expressed pro-vaccine sentiments; that is, pro-vaccine sentiments did not seem to encourage people to tweet more positive sentiments of their own.

"Our third finding was the most bizarre and perhaps the most discouraging," Salathé said. He and his team looked at the sheer volume of negative or positive tweets followers received—independent of how many individuals the users followed. "Not surprisingly, we found that a high volume of negative tweets seemed to encourage people to tweet more negatively. But strangely, a high volume of positive seemed to encourage people to tweet more negatively, too," Salathé said. "In other words, pro-vaccine messages seemed to backfire when enough of them were received."

Salathé hopes to design additional Twitter studies to test whether the same effects can be observed for sentiments expressed about other vaccines, as well as about other health issues such as antibiotic usage, dieting, and exercising. "While some of our results from the H1N1 study may seem frustrating, there are silver linings," Salathé said. "First, we have a tried-and-true way to track and analyze the wealth of data out there on Twitter. Second, further studies may reveal why positive messages seem to encourage negative tweeting; perhaps there's something about the manner in which the message is being conveyed. For example, public could use that information to send positive messages in a way that would be more likely to have the intended effect."

Explore further: Algorithm accounts for uncertainty to enable more accurate modeling

Related Stories

Most influential tweeters of all

Sep 09, 2010

Tweet this, Ashton Kutcher, Lady Gaga and Britney Spears. Just because you have a ton of followers on Twitter doesn't necessarily mean you're among the most influential people in the Twitterverse, according to researchers ...

Twitter lets advertisers better target tweets

Jul 19, 2012

Twitter on Thursday began letting businesses more easily turn tweets into advertising that targets users of the globally popular one-to-many text messaging service.

Study: Twitter users tough on Republicans, Obama

Dec 08, 2011

(AP) -- The 2012 presidential contenders have had a rough go of it on Twitter, according to an analysis of the political conversation taking place on the popular social network.

2010's biggest stories influenced by celebrity tweets

Jan 10, 2011

Tweets from popular news organizations have a major influence on hot Twitter topics, but a Northwestern University analysis of the Top Twitter Trends in 2010 shows that celebrities, such as Adam Lambert and Conan O’Brien, ...

Recommended for you

Cattle ID system shows its muzzle

Jun 29, 2015

Maybe it sounds like a cow and bull story, but researchers in Egypt are developing a biometric identification system for cattle that could reduce food fraud and allow ranchers to control their stock more efficiently. The ...

Combining personalization and privacy for user data

Jun 29, 2015

Computer scientists and legal experts from Trinity College Dublin and SFI's ADAPT centre are working to marry two of cyberspace's greatest desires, by simultaneously providing enhanced options for user personalisation alongside ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Apr 04, 2013
"Whatever the reason, the observation is troubling because it suggests that negative opinions on vaccination may spread more easily than positive opinions."

Entropy suggests it should always requires more effort to extinguish confusion than to establish confusion.

But strangely, a high volume of positive tweets seemed to encourage people to tweet more negatively, too," Salathé said. "In other words, pro-vaccine messages seemed to backfire when enough of them were received."

Not strange. It's stupid, but normal, in the sense that this behavior is observed everywhere in nearly all topics.

People associate negative individual experience with the entire field of medicine.

Patient A: "Doctor A didn't treat me properly, therefore I can't trust healthcare professionals, therefore I distrust 'Vaccine X'."

Patient B: "Vaccine Y made me a little sick, therefore Vaccine X shouldn't be trusted."

Here B is forgetting that at least they didn't get the active strain of Y.
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 04, 2013
Natural selection. Those who evaluate the issue and the risks incorrectly and are easily influenced to do so by social connections will spend more time ill and possibly die. So will their children. Selection pressures still exist. People think that because we are not being hunted by lions or freezing to death that evolution has stopped. Not so.
3 / 5 (2) Apr 05, 2013
@Lurker rather appropriate name considering your comment:
Patient: Vaccines have killed a number of people and, in the case of annual flu vaccines have never been double blind studied so no one even can prove whether they are actually effective from year to year or not.
Several countries have actually had problems with children dying as a result of drug companies using them as guinea pigs. Do some real research of the crap the pharmaceutical industry has done to people to experiment with their drugs before you give across the board approval for all vaccines.
BTW they are still using thermesol in some of them. FDA allowed a name change. Lead is lead by any name. It is also dangerous at VERY low dosages and there is NO confusion about that.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.