TV startup shakes up US broadcasters with court win

Apr 07, 2013 by Rob Lever
File picture for illustration shows a customer looking at television setsin a department store. A startup whose business model is based on tiny antennas receiving over-the-air television for online viewing by subscribers has put the US broadcast industry on the defensive.

A startup whose business model is based on tiny antennas receiving over-the-air television for online viewing by subscribers has put the US broadcast industry on the defensive.

Aereo made headlines on April 1 with a preliminary court victory over the major , which had sought to shut down the service for .

The case, which is still pending, is seen by some as a potentially groundbreaking test: for consumers, whether they can "shift" TV viewing to the Web through a third party; and for broadcasters, whether they can maintain control of their content.

Aereo, which is backed by media mogul Barry Diller, launched in early 2012 in the New York area and was immediately sued by the major —ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox—for copyright infringement.

The company claims its actions are legal, because it is not rebroadcasting, but giving subscribers a personal in its New York warehouse that enables them to watch or record it for later viewing.

A US appeals court panel agreed with Aereo, in a preliminary decision on a request for an injunction to shut down the service. A full hearing in the case is still pending.

The court ruled 2-1 that Aereo was not retransmitting "public performances," which would be banned under , but merely allowing customers to rent antennas to receive and record free broadcasts.

"Aereo's system creates a unique copy of that program on a portion of a hard drive assigned only to that Aereo user," the appeals court said, upholding a lower .

Chet Kanojia, Aereo's founder and chief executive, said the ruling "sends a powerful message that consumer access to free-to-air broadcast television is still meaningful in this country and that the promise and commitment made by the broadcasters to act in the in exchange for the public's spectrum remains an important part of our American fabric."

Some called the ruling a victory for consumers, saying it will allow them to get out from constraints from cable companies, which call the shots for most US TV viewers.

Mitch Stoltz of the Electronic Frontier Foundation called the court decision "a win for Aereo, its customers and for future innovators with the audacity to improve the TV-watching experience."

Stoltz said the ruling "gives companies like Aereo an incentive to put TV technology firmly under the viewer's control."

Aereo "looks like a good idea" for a "broken industry," said independent analyst and consultant Jeff Kagan.

"This is an industry where where prices keep going up every year," he added. "The cable companies keep giving people more channels but the average customer watches only five or 10 channels. We may be coming into a time when customers are going to have options."

Ed Black at the Computer & Communications Industry Association said the case is "a test of the legitimacy of the cloud computing industry."

The court "agreed with us that users should be able to access their own, lawfully acquired content in the cloud without the fear of being branded pirates," Black added.

But the National Association of Broadcasters, which represents the main networks, said it was "disappointed" the the declined to shut down what it called "illegal operations" that violate copyright laws.

NAB spokesman Dennis Wharton said he was encouraged by the dissenting opinion which said Aereo's system of individual antennas is a "sham" designed "to avoid the reach of the Copyright Act."

It remains unclear if Aereo will pose a threat to broadcasters or the cable industry. The company has declined to say how many subscribers it has, but estimates are only a few thousand in the New York area, with plans to launch in more than 20 additional cities soon.

Richard Greenfield of BTIG Research said the TV landscape is shifting with Aereo and other kinds of streaming services, and broadcasters need to face the challenge.

"As long as Aereo exists for consumers, it significantly changes the leverage imbalance that has dominated (retransmission) negotiations," he said.

"The more markets Aereo expands to, the greater the retrans leverage shifts."

Greenfield said broadcasters "need to accept Aereo's legality and figure out how to deal with the implications to their business."

Explore further: Chattanooga touts transformation into Gig City

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Aereo wins partial victory in broadcasters' suit

May 22, 2012

(AP) -- Aereo, a startup that takes live TV broadcasts and sends them to mobile devices in New York for a monthly fee, has won a partial victory in court over the media companies that are suing it.

CEO: Lawuit could kill Internet TV startup

May 31, 2012

(AP) — News Corp.'s Fox and other broadcasters went to court on Wednesday to try to pull the plug on a startup that takes live TV programming and sends it to mobile devices in New York for a monthly fee.

Aereo, TV over Internet service, expands to PCs

Oct 17, 2012

(AP)—Billionaire Barry Diller's Aereo is broadening availability of its service even as broadcasters challenge the legality of the startup's live television transmissions over the Internet.

Recommended for you

Key decisions on drones likely from Congress

10 hours ago

The Obama administration is on the verge of proposing long-awaited rules for commercial drone operations in U.S. skies, but key decisions on how much access to grant drones are likely to come from Congress ...

N. Korea suffers another Internet shutdown

Dec 27, 2014

North Korea suffered an Internet shutdown for at least two hours on Saturday, Chinese state-media and cyber experts said, after Pyongyang blamed Washington for an online blackout earlier this week.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dogbert
3.5 / 5 (8) Apr 07, 2013
Other options are definitely welcome.
wellfeded
5 / 5 (6) Apr 07, 2013
Anything that ticks off the cable moguls is allright by me.
vacuum-mechanics
1 / 5 (15) Apr 07, 2013
A startup whose business model is based on tiny antennas receiving over-the-air television for online viewing by subscribers has put the US broadcast industry on the defensive.

By the way, it is interesting to note that nowadays we still do not understand how any kind of tele-communication which based on electromagnetic wave work! Maybe this simple physical mechanism could help us to visualize it.
http://www.vacuum...20〈=en
gwrede
1 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2013
By the way, it is interesting to note that nowadays we still do not understand how any kind of tele-communication which based on electromagnetic wave work!
Yes. I see you don't understand it. But broadcasting this misunderstanding doesn't make things better.
Lurker2358
1 / 5 (2) Apr 07, 2013
So...

This is legal, but Napster is not?!
Sean_W
2 / 5 (4) Apr 08, 2013
You still need an ISP to access this service; Like your cable company or one of their co-competitors. Meh.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.