Researchers develop new monolayer materials for chemical vapor sensors

Apr 01, 2013
This is a schematic of a vapor sensor fabricated from a single monolayer of MoS2. The conductivity of the MoS2 channel changes as specific types of vapor molecules briefly interact with the surface. Molecules of triethylamine are shown a chemical assoicated with V-series nerve gas agents. Credit: U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

(Phys.org) —Scientists at the Naval Research Laboratory have developed a vapor sensor based on new monolayer materials that show great potential for future nanoscale electronic devices.

NRL scientists have fabricated this sensor using a single monolayer of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) on a wafer. They show that it functions effectively as a chemical vapor sensor, exhibiting highly selective reactivity to a range of analytes, and providing sensitive transduction of transient surface physisorption events to the of the monolayer channel. The high surface-to-volume ratio of such new two-dimensional materials is a significant asset for vapor sensor applications—these materials must exhibit a rapid and selective response to a range of analytes (determined by the character of surface atomic sites), sensitive transduction of the perturbation to the of the channel, and upon removal of the vapor. A full report of this work is published in the journal Nano Letters.

Much work has previously been done in developing carbon nanotubes as sensors. The carbon nanotubes are very responsive, but not as selective as they need to be unless they are chemically functionalized, which adds complexity and expense to the manufacturing process. Researchers have also looked at graphene, a single layer of in a , as a vapor sensor. However, graphene shows a relatively weak response to the various analytes and is not very selective. It also responds to water vapor, which makes it less desirable as a sensor, since water vapor is found everywhere. NRL's Dr. Berry Jonker notes, "You don't know if it is sensing or nerve gas. Should I run because the humidity is high, or because there has been a release of sarin?" The MoS2 sensors developed at NRL offer excellent potential because they are both very responsive and highly selective.

The NRL research team tested their two-dimensional MoS2 sensors by exposing them to a variety of analyte vapors including common industrial chemicals and solvents, as well as by-products, simulants or precursors for explosives and nerve agents. Their goal was to see how exposure to these analytes impacted the sensor's ability to conduct electrical charge. They discovered that the presence of a few specific analytes significantly changed the conductivity of the MoS2 channel. The interaction is transient, Dr. Jonker explains—the molecule does not permanently stick to the surface, but briefly resides or interacts with the surface to change the conductivity of the channel, as illustrated in the figure. The substance is very weakly bound through a process called physisorption. As the concentration in the air changes, so does the amount on the surface, and the conductivity changes accordingly. This can be helpful in locating the source of a vapor.

In particular, the MoS2 sensor is sensitive to triethylamine (TEA), a chemical associated with the V-series agents. But the NRL-developed sensor does not respond to a lot of common non-harmful chemicals that would otherwise give a lot of false alarms.

The NRL research team has also noted that the polarity of the monolayer MoS2 sensor's response is typically opposite to that of a sensor. They present a model for analyte/sensor interaction in which the analyte serves as either an electron donor or acceptor, producing a temporary charge perturbation of the sensor material. So if the two types of sensors were used in combination, then the confidence level of the reading could be significantly increased. Safety officers or warfighters using a sensor that combined the two (carbon nanotubes and MoS2) could work with increased confidence that the sensor is really detecting a given analyte such as TEA, rather than something else.

Other 2D monolayer materials (MoSe2, TaS2, WSe2, NbSe2, MgB2, BN, etc) are likely to offer complementary sensitivities due to different chemical composition and bonding. The NRL research team envisions development of suites of these 2D material sensors and carbon nanotubes with complementary responsivities, integrated with transistor amplifiers fabricated from the same materials, enabling unambiguous identification of a wide range of analytes in a very compact and low power package.

Explore further: Graphene sensor tracks down cancer biomarkers

More information: Nano Letters 22 January 2013; DOI: 10.1021/nl3043079

Related Stories

New biosensor benefits from melding of carbon nanotubes, DNA

Nov 15, 2011

Purdue University scientists have developed a method for stacking synthetic DNA and carbon nanotubes onto a biosensor electrode, a development that may lead to more accurate measurements for research related to diabetes and ...

Flaky graphene makes reliable chemical sensors

Jan 17, 2012

Scientists from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the company Dioxide Materials have demonstrated that randomly stacked graphene flakes can make an effective chemical sensor.

Recommended for you

Twisted graphene chills out

Sep 17, 2014

(Phys.org) —When two sheets of graphene are stacked in a special way, it is possible to cool down the graphene with a laser instead of heating it up, University of Manchester researchers have shown.

User comments : 0