Shape from sound: New methods to probe the universe

Apr 03, 2013 by Mor­gan Kelly

(Phys.org) —As the universe expands, it is continually subjected to energy shifts, or "quantum fluctuations," that send out little pulses of "sound" into the fabric of spacetime. In fact, the universe is thought to have sprung from just such an energy shift.

A recent paper in the journal Physical Review Letters reports a new mathematical tool that should allow one to use these sounds to help reveal the shape of the universe. The authors reconsider an old question in spectral geometry that asks, roughly, to what extent can the shape of a thing be known from the sound of its acoustic vibrations? The researchers approached this problem by breaking it down into small workable pieces, according to author Tejal Bhamre, a Princeton University graduate student in physics.

To understand the authors' method, consider a vase. If one taps a vase with a spoon, it will make a sound that is characteristic of its shape. Similarly, the technique Bhamre and her coauthors developed could, in principle, determine the shape of spacetime from the perpetual ringing caused by .

The researchers' technique also provides a unique connection between the two pillars of and —by using vibrational wavelengths to define the geometric property that is spacetime.

Bhamre worked with coauthors David Aasen, a physics graduate student at Caltech, and Achim Kempf, a Waterloo University professor of physics of information.

Explore further: Superconducting circuits, simplified

More information: David Aasen, Tejal Bhamre and Achim Kempf. 2013. Shape from Sound: Toward New Tools for Quantum Gravity. Physical Review Letters. Article first published online: March 18, 2013. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.121301. http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v110/i12/e121301

Related Stories

Spacetime May Have Fractal Properties on a Quantum Scale

Mar 25, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Usually, we think of spacetime as being four-dimensional, with three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. However, this Euclidean perspective is just one of many possible multi-dimensional ...

Does probability come from quantum physics?

Feb 05, 2013

(Phys.org)—Ever since Austrian scientist Erwin Schrodinger put his unfortunate cat in a box, his fellow physicists have been using something called quantum theory to explain and understand the nature of waves and particles.

Spacetime: A smoother brew than we knew

Jan 09, 2013

Spacetime may be less like foamy quantum beer and more like smooth Einsteinian whiskey, according to research led by physicist Robert Nemiroff of Michigan Technological University being presented today at the 221st American ...

Metamaterials used to mimic the Big Crunch

Jul 29, 2011

Spacetime analogs is an emerging field of physics in which scientists investigate systems having mathematical links with general relativity, and test their theories about the early behavior of the universe. The latest in ...

Recommended for you

Cold Atom Laboratory creates atomic dance

15 hours ago

Like dancers in a chorus line, atoms' movements become synchronized when lowered to extremely cold temperatures. To study this bizarre phenomenon, called a Bose-Einstein condensate, researchers need to cool ...

Scientists create possible precursor to life

22 hours ago

How did life originate? And can scientists create life? These questions not only occupy the minds of scientists interested in the origin of life, but also researchers working with technology of the future. ...

Superconducting circuits, simplified

Oct 17, 2014

Computer chips with superconducting circuits—circuits with zero electrical resistance—would be 50 to 100 times as energy-efficient as today's chips, an attractive trait given the increasing power consumption ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CQT
1 / 5 (5) Apr 03, 2013
Yes. Spectral geometry is my god. Science is not possible without this. Let us pray. lol
ValeriaT
3 / 5 (4) Apr 03, 2013
preprint: it's only theory about theory, no actual results are presented.
CQT
1 / 5 (4) Apr 03, 2013
Ophelia? I am among the numberless that make a living with spectral analysis. What has not been imagined by form or shape?
packrat
1 / 5 (3) Apr 04, 2013
I have a question that's probably totally stupid but I'm going to ask anyway.
If these energy shifts as the universe expands make a type of sound then what is it's average frequency? And if the energy is spreading out wouldn't that mean that the frequency is slowly going down? In my odd logic following that possibility would indicate that eventually the universe will reach a maximum size once that frequency reaches zero or close to it but at the same time the universe would effectively be "dead"
Totally off in left field or somewhat possible?
ant_oacute_nio354
1 / 5 (7) Apr 04, 2013
Spacetime doesn't exist.

c^2.t^2 - x^2 = S
S = 1.9121x10^-34 m^2 -- A universal constant as light speed.
i(S)^1/2 = Neutrino Compton wavelength (imaginary)

Antonio Jose Saraiva
vlaaing peerd
5 / 5 (3) Apr 04, 2013
morons don't exist, time does.

Considering 5.86x102 Joules is the energy of one beer, using D.Tomkins equations, time can be most easily described as:

1s = sqrt(E/μ²*ρ)beer/3

vlaaing peerd
3 / 5 (2) Apr 04, 2013
sorry, has to be;

1s = sqrt(E/μ³*ρ)beer1/3
ant_oacute_nio354
1 / 5 (6) Apr 04, 2013
I put my name on --- idiots
DarkHorse66
5 / 5 (2) Apr 05, 2013
I put my name on --- idiots

You put your name on. So what! Are you trying to tell us that you are actually SURPRISED by the responses your posts have been getting?! Each time you post, your only contribution is to tell us that this or that does not exist and throw some ad hoc equation(s) without a genuine context out, as 'proof'. Do you actually expect any of us to take you seriously, with statements like that? If ever you tried to get that published the way you write those statements, you would get laughed straight off any pre-print site! Do you REALLY think that we are so moronic that you can confidently expect us to swallow your BS just because you post it? Where is your proof? Where is your evidence? How about either involving yourself in discussions for real, with real explanations, or stop posting at all. As they say, "if you have nothing intelligent to say, say nothing at all". Mate, if you ARE a GENUINE scientist, you REALLY should know better!
DH66
DarkHorse66
5 / 5 (2) Apr 05, 2013
Just remember, every time you pull a stunt like the one you did in this thread and many others, you re-enforce the impression for all of us, that you are just posting for posting's sake. In other words, being a troll. But then again, your very low ranking (I DO presume that you have managed to work out how to check/access that...) should have tipped you off by now that your hit and run technique is not working.
DH66
ant_oacute_nio354
1 / 5 (4) Apr 05, 2013
c^2.t^2 - x^2 = S

No one knows this formula?
And this:
Spacetime = sqrt( x^2 y^2 z^2 (ict)^2 )