Researchers discover plants are enormous water users

Apr 04, 2013 by Steve Carr
Researchers discover plants are enormous water users
UNM doctoral Scott Jasechko collects a water sample from the Santa Fe River near La Bajada. Credit: Zachary Lapointe

(Phys.org) —A new study published today in Nature by researchers at the University of New Mexico indicates the immense amount of fresh water used by plants and its movement during their life cycle has significant implications for future predictions about climate change.

The paper, titled " fluxes dominated by transpiration," was authored by UNM doctoral student Scott Jasechko, under the mentorship of Regents' Professor Zach Sharp and Associate Professor Peter Fawcett, both from the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, and co-authors at the university and Canadian research organization Alberta Innovates.

According to the research, which was funded through a grant from the UNM Caswell Silver Foundation graduate fellowship program, used by plants during growth accounts for the largest movement of fresh on earth and is more than 1.5 times the movement of water in all the planet's rivers. Also, the amount of water moved from land into the atmosphere by plants is five times greater than evaporation on continents.

"The study is important because it suggests research should focus on water transport in plants when assessing the availability of fresh water in a future, warming climate in order to better predict how much water will be available for drinking water, manufacturing and food production," said Jasechko, the study's lead author.

Water is transported from Earth's surface into the air either by evaporation or by plant "breathing," a process better known as transpiration. Until now, the amounts of fresh water consumed by evaporation and transpiration were not known and were lumped into a single term – evapo-transpiration.

"Each water molecule is made up of one part oxygen, two parts hydrogen," Jasechko said. "Some types of oxygen and hydrogen that occur in nature are slightly heavier and slightly lighter than others, these are known as isotopes. What we found useful in this study, is the different behavior of these isotopes during evaporation and transpiration."

The isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen were analyzed in water samples collected from large rivers and lakes, and these samples "remember" how much they have evaporated and transpired since falling from the sky as precipitation. Because of this difference we were able to separate evaporation – a physical process – from transpiration – a biological process – and calculate each water movement separately."

The researchers at UNM calculated the total amount of water that plants use on earth using a global dataset of water samples collected from Earth's largest rivers and lakes. The isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen within these samples "remember" the amount of and transpiration since the water fell as precipitation. Results show that plants on land transpire 60,000 km3 of water each year – the equivalent of the flows of 10 Amazon Rivers (or 100 Mississippi Rivers or 1,000 Rhine Rivers) – and consume half of all the solar energy absorbed by Earth's continents.

"Transpiration is also intricately linked to the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – the most important contributing greenhouse gas to current climate warming," Jasechko said. "When plants transpire – or 'exhale' – water, they assimilate – or 'inhale' – carbon dioxide from the atmosphere."

By linking the ratios of water transpiration and carbon assimilation – or "plant breathing" – the researchers calculated both carbon uptake and water transpiration by plants. Water-Carbon "breathing" calculated in the study agreed with a multitude of other carbon uptake studies based on satellite and on-the-ground measurements. Examining the exchange of carbon and water provided a useful calculation check that produced identical results to the isotope-based calculation of transpiration, verifying the study's results confirming the large water transpiration rate findings.

"This study acknowledges the importance of plant life in controlling the amount of precipitation that ends up in our rivers," Jasechko said. "We also show that the water that is used by plants is vital to sustaining all life on Earth – including food production for humanity. The most fundamental resources for humanity are food, water, shelter and clothing. All of these needs – either directly or indirectly – require fresh water.

"To date, much of the focus has been given to potential changes in precipitation in a changing climate. What this study suggests is that changes to – via natural ecosystem shifts, land use changes, deforestation or other modifications – may be as important as changes to precipitation when it comes to future fresh water availability."

Explore further: Research team helps develop new forecast systems for northern Gulf of Mexico

Related Stories

A new transporter gene that regulates plant transpiration

Sep 09, 2011

When plants feel stress from a lack of water, they close their epidermal pores, or stomata, to prevent water loss via transpiration. Each stoma is flanked by a pair of guard cells, which change shape to close or open stomata ...

US rivers and streams saturated with carbon

Oct 17, 2011

Rivers and streams in the United States are releasing enough carbon into the atmosphere to fuel 3.4 million car trips to the moon, according to Yale researchers in Nature Geoscience. Their findings could ...

Gene helps plants use less water without biomass loss

Jan 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Purdue University researchers have found a genetic mutation that allows a plant to better endure drought without losing biomass, a discovery that could reduce the amount of water required for growing plants ...

Recommended for you

Rating the planet's oceans

1 hour ago

The most comprehensive assessment conducted by the Ocean Health Index rates the Earth's oceans at 67 out of 100 in overall health. In addition, for the first time, the report assessed the Antarctic and the ...

Feds to unveil cleanup plan for nuke waste dump

3 hours ago

After nearly eight months, the U.S. Department of Energy has formalized a plan for cleaning up the federal government's troubled nuclear waste dump in southeastern New Mexico.

Climate change affecting species

6 hours ago

The Global Change and Sustainability Research Institute (GCSRI) and the Wits Rural Facility (WRF) hosted a top climate change scientist, Professor Camille Parmesan, who delivered a talk to staff, students ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
3 / 5 (4) Apr 04, 2013
Of course the important bit of the study is to quantify exactly how much water is being used by plants, but still...

Plants use a lot of water. Duh?
Sean_W
3.2 / 5 (5) Apr 04, 2013
Plants also produce aerosols which cause water to nucleate forming droplets which cause rain. If the plant didn't increase the amount of water in the air that water would run faster into the rivers, lakes and oceans instead of falling as rain on land. The roots also allow more water to stay in the soil and some leaks down into the water table, recharging it. To say that plants "use" lots of water is true but misleading because it uses it by retaining it in the locality.

When you irrigate crops you also enhance wilderness down wind where it rains this transpirated water and the increase of water in the ecosystem improves the water retaining and recharging of the system. "Wasting" water can sometimes have a net improvement in water availability. But people see a little water drawn-down near well bores and assume it means the whole aquifer is being drained.
rkolter
3 / 5 (2) Apr 04, 2013
My first thought was, "Duh..." too.

It is an interesting article though.

I wonder how they determined that plantlife absorbs 50% of the sunlight radiating on the planet, when the planet is not itself covered 50% by plant life?
Maggnus
5 / 5 (2) Apr 04, 2013
I wonder how they determined that plantlife absorbs 50% of the sunlight radiating on the planet, when the planet is not itself covered 50% by plant life?


Thats not what the article said. It said that plants absorb half of the sun's energy that is absorbed by continents. Big difference.
barakn
not rated yet Apr 04, 2013
Perhaps you should try reading more carefully. It says "Results show that plants ON LAND transpire 60,000 km3 of water each year – the equivalent of the flows of 10 Amazon Rivers (or 100 Mississippi Rivers or 1,000 Rhine Rivers) – and consume half of all the solar energy absorbed by Earth's CONTINENTS." (emphasis mine)
Lurker2358
1 / 5 (1) Apr 04, 2013
incident solar energy and absorbed solar energy are two different amounts.
antonima
1 / 5 (1) Apr 04, 2013

I wonder how they determined that plantlife absorbs 50% of the sunlight radiating on the planet, when the planet is not itself covered 50% by plant life?


I think the article was referring to absorption by continents. I don't like this statistic either though, I know that plants are only 2 or 3 % efficient with the energy that they receive - most of sunlight is turned into heat. I suppose however that much of this energy may be re-radiated back into space as infrared, and in fact 50% of the energy that remains is in plant matter.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (7) Apr 04, 2013
And, in other news, scientists discover plants breathe CO2 and that the GW Alarmists drive to control it will result in their death. They expressed the need for millions in funding to try and prove themselves wrong.