Does mixing eBay and Facebook reduce bidding prices?

April 9, 2013

In a competitive context, consumers are willing to pay significantly more to win when other bidders are unknown, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

"The tendency to assume that other consumers are similar to us is reversed when we're in a competitive, as opposed to cooperative, situation. This alters our toward others and the prices we are willing to bid in auctions," write authors David A. Norton (University of Connecticut), Cait Lamberton (University of Pittsburgh), and Rebecca Walker Naylor (Ohio State University).

Consumers tend to believe strangers are socially similar. This lowers aggressiveness toward others. But competitive contexts lead consumers to become more aggressive because they infer that others are different.

In a series of simulated , some consumers viewed profiles of other bidders that were manipulated to be either similar or different (based on like age, gender, and location), while others weren't given any information about other bidders. Consumers consistently bid less aggressively when they believed their competitors were similar rather than different. More interestingly, bidding aggressiveness and prices were much higher when other bidders were different or unknown.

Companies using auctions may want to resist the urge to link consumers to social media profiles. Consumers who discover they share traits with the people they're competing against may lower their aggressiveness, pushing prices down.

"Competitive contexts radically change the we make about other consumers compared to cooperative situations. When we compete, we want to go for the jugular – and we won't do that when we know we're competing against consumers who are similar to us. But we behave more aggressively when there is no other information about other consumers because we assume they are different," the authors conclude.

Explore further: In-store displays: How do consumers perceive pricing?

More information: David A. Norton, Cait Lamberton, and Rebecca Walker Naylor. "The Devil You (Don't) Know: Interpersonal Ambiguity and Inference Making in Competitive Contexts." Journal of Consumer Research: August 2013.

Related Stories

Selling on eBay? Get higher bids with a red background

July 17, 2012

The color red influences consumers to become more aggressive in online auctions and affects how much they are willing to pay for products as varied as video game consoles and Florida vacation packages, according to a new ...

Is the iPad Creative? It depends on who's buying it

March 5, 2013

Encouraging consumers to feel ownership of products they haven't yet purchased can backfire because consumers tend to see themselves in the products they own, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

Recommended for you

Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?

August 28, 2015

Everyone is excited by discoveries of new dinosaurs – or indeed any new fossil species. But a key question for palaeontologists is 'just how good is the fossil record?' Do we know fifty per cent of the species of dinosaurs ...

Fractals patterns in a drummer's music

August 28, 2015

Fractal patterns are profoundly human – at least in music. This is one of the findings of a team headed by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization in Göttingen and Harvard University ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

BishopBalderdash
1 / 5 (1) Apr 10, 2013
could this be a sign of familial bias in our behavior at a subconscious level? reasoning: {is similar to me} <-> {possible family member}

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.