Fighting the 'dumb jock' stereotype

Apr 22, 2013 by Andy Mcglashen , Deborah Feltz

College coaches who emphasize their players' academic abilities may be the best defense against the effects of "dumb jock" stereotypes, a Michigan State University study suggests.

Researchers found that student-athletes were significantly more likely to be confident in the classroom if they believed their coaches expected high , not just good enough grades to be eligible for sports.

"Coaches spend a lot of time with their players, and they can play such an important role to build academic confidence in student-athletes," said lead author Deborah Feltz, University Distinguished Professor of at MSU.

Published in the Journal of College Student Development, the study focused on the concept of "." The theory holds that are self-fulfilling prophecies: They create anxiety in the stereotyped group, causing them to behave in the expected way.

Feltz and her graduate students wanted to see what factors influence student-athletes' to the "dumb jock" stereotype.

"It's well-documented in the literature that many student-athletes hear prejudicial remarks from who say things like, 'This test is easy enough that even an athlete could pass it,'" Feltz said. "They're kind of the last group of students who can be openly discriminated against."

The researchers surveyed more than 300 student-athletes representing men's and women's teams from small and large universities and a range of sports, from basketball and football to cross-country and rowing.

They found the more strongly student-athletes identified themselves as athletes, the less confident they were with their , and the more keenly they felt that others expected them to do poorly in school. Players in high-profile sports were more likely to feel they were weak students.

Feltz said the data suggest that coaches who put a premium on education may be in the best position to boost their players' confidence in the classroom, but professors, academic advisers and classmates also have a part to play.

"They don't have to do much," she said. "It may be enough to just remind players they are college students, which is a big deal, you know? A lot of these students are the first in their family to go to college."

Explore further: Research geared to keep women from fleeing IT profession

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Athletes may have different reasons for marijuana use

Jul 11, 2011

College athletes tend to be less likely than their non-athlete peers to smoke marijuana. But when they do, they may have some different reasons for it, according to a study in the July issue of the Journal of Studies on Al ...

Recommended for you

Orphaned children can do just as well in institutions

13 hours ago

The removal of institutions or group homes will not lead to better child well-being and could even worsen outcomes for some orphaned and separated children, according to new findings from a three-year study across five low- ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mvg
1 / 5 (3) Apr 22, 2013
"coaches who put a premium on education"

You MUST be kidding--Who gets PAID more--the education staff--or--the coaching staff??

That one fact says it all.