Researchers suggest conformity pressure and desire to keep-up is pushing unsustainable population growth

April 19, 2013 by Bob Yirka report

( —Partha Dasgupta an economist with the University of Cambridge and Paul Ehrlich, a conservation biologist at Stanford University have published a paper in the journal Science in which they suggest that peer pressure and a desire to keep up with others can lead to unsustainable population growth. They use data from several sources to compare population growth rates between people in African—where population growth is exploding in some areas—with others where it is not, to show that when people experience peer pressure to have large families and also feel pressure to keep up with the consumption habits of other people where they live, the result can be explosive population growth.

The two researchers note that in many parts of Africa, current growth rates mean a likely doubling of the population by 2050—they add that increased consumption rates by the same people is leading to unsustainable growth patterns due to limited . among men to produce as many children as possible (due to historical land tenure issues) they assert, has led to a very high fosterage rate, while the burden of supporting children continues to fall primarily on women. At the same time, they found that despite living on just an average of 1200 international dollars a year, consumption rates in the same areas have been climbing for several years. Taken all together, they say, it makes for an environment full of externalities that promote fertility.

Scientists have not been able to agree on how many people our planet can sustain. Some suggest we are already on a population curve that will lead to war, disease and general misery. Others contend that innovations and discoveries will lead to higher food yields and other technologies to shelter clothe and provide for the needs of an ever growing number of people. No one is suggesting that there is no limit to how many people can live here on Earth, it's a question of how many can live here at what level. The pessimistic view is that nature will provide the corrections for us, while those with a more optimistic outlook suggest that technology and education will lead us to curbing our growth by managing our birthrate intelligently.

Dasgupta and Ehrlich argue that their research shows that circumstances in some parts of the world are leading to a situation that is unsustainable—it won't self correct and unless something changes such systems will collapse. They suggest that an education program for women (by people at both the global and local level) be instituted to break the pattern of fertility encouragement—it's been shown to be effective in other parts of the world.

Explore further: To feed the world, give women equal rights

More information: Pervasive Externalities at the Population, Consumption, and Environment Nexus, Science 19 April 2013: Vol. 340 no. 6130 pp. 324-328 DOI: 10.1126/science.1224664

Growing concerns that contemporary patterns of economic development are unsustainable have given rise to an extensive empirical literature on population growth, consumption increases, and our growing use of nature's products and services. However, far less has been done to reach a theoretical understanding of the socio-ecological processes at work at the population-consumption-environment nexus. In this Research Article, we highlight the ubiquity of externalities (which are the unaccounted for consequences for others, including future people) of decisions made by each of us on reproduction, consumption, and the use of our natural environment. Externalities, of which the "tragedy of the commons" remains the most widely discussed illustration, are a cause of inefficiency in the allocation of resources across space, time, and contingencies; in many situations, externalities accentuate inequity as well. Here, we identify and classify externalities in consumption and reproductive decisions and use of the natural environment so as to construct a unified theoretical framework for the study of data drawn from the nexus. We show that externalities at the nexus are not self-correcting in the marketplace. We also show that fundamental nonlinearities, built into several categories of externalities, amplify the socio-ecological processes operating at the nexus. Eliminating the externalities would, therefore, require urgent collective action at both local and global levels.

Related Stories

To feed the world, give women equal rights

February 15, 2013

Around the world, at least a billion people are hungry or need better diets. To feed a global population projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050, we will need to increase food production by as much as 70 percent, most analysts ...

Recommended for you

Giant dinosaur footprint discovered in Mongolia desert

September 30, 2016

One of the biggest dinosaur footprints ever recorded has been unearthed in the Gobi Desert, researchers said Friday, offering a fresh clue about the giant creatures that roamed the earth millions of years ago.

Game theory research reveals fragility of common resources

September 29, 2016

New research in game theory shows that people are naturally predisposed to over-use "common-pool resources" such as transportation systems and fisheries even if it risks failure of the system, to the detriment of society ...

Ancient reptile fossils claw for more attention

September 29, 2016

Newly recovered fossils confirm that Drepanosaurus, a prehistoric cross between a chameleon and an anteater, was a small reptile with a fearsome finger. The second digit of its forelimb sported a massive claw.

Humans may have occupied Southern Cone 14,000 years ago

September 29, 2016

Humans may have occupied the Southern Cone 14,000 years ago, according to a study published September 28, 2016 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Gustavo Politis from CONICET and the Universidad Nacional del Centro de ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (4) Apr 19, 2013
Humans, like any other animal, will tend to produce more offspring than can be expected to survive to maturity. They don't NEED peer pressure to do this. This is NATURAL and the norm without strong cultural intervention.

But cultures have evolved which seek to maximize this propensity in order to outgrow and overrun their neighbors. Religion is the mechanism designed to make this happen.

And so the people who did the study are being dishonest in 2 ways; they fail to acknowledge biology and they fail to acknowledge religion as the main reason for overpopulation where it occurs.

They imply that sustainable growth is the norm which is not true. It is the exception and takes a great deal of artificial effort to maintain.
2.5 / 5 (2) Apr 19, 2013
It seems that both African and African American males take pride in how many children they have, regardless of thier ability to care for them. Its partly cultural, but Im starting to think it is genetic also. I know that I would not take pride in having lots of illegimate children! Once again, African American and African people are notoriously short-sighted!
3 / 5 (1) Apr 19, 2013
Any population biologist can tell you that there are forces that impel individuals to gather and other forces that impel them to disperse. Any mathematician conversant with non-linear dynamics can tell you that will lead to variations in local population density and in birth/death rates. Malthus was very close to the key.
I have to wonder if the authors were conversant with the work of John B. Calhoun with overpopulation in rodents.
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 19, 2013
It seems that both African and African American males take pride in how many children they have, regardless of thier ability to care for them. Its partly cultural, but Im starting to think it is genetic also
We are all tropical animals. Our reproduction is not seasonal. Reproduction is naturally the most rewarding thing we can do. You are pretty ignorant, willful or otherwise.

The amish are the fastest growing ethnic group in the US. You didnt know that did you? They are closely followed by mormons, hasidim, and fundy muslims.
I have to wonder if the authors were conversant with the work of John B. Calhoun with overpopulation in rodents.
-Which is -?
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 19, 2013
Overpopulation is endemic to undeveloped nation groups and always has been. Where life is cheap, it is also virulent.
Check out what has happened to the increase US population over the past 20 years. Most developed nations are well ahead of the US, with Italy and Japan leading the way.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.