Blowing the whistle on bad behavior takes more than guts

Apr 30, 2013
Blowing the whistle on bad behavior takes more than guts

(Phys.org) —Our work environments play a bigger role than previously thought when it comes to reporting unethical behavior, according to University of Michigan researcher.

"Our findings contradict that the of an employee drive his or her decision to speak up," said David Mayer, assistant professor of management and organizations at U-M's Ross School of Business.

The research found that the —namely, one's supervisor and co-workers—plays a critical role in an employee's decision to speak up about wrongdoing.

In the past decade, we have witnessed many ethical failures from leaders of companies such as Enron, and Fannie Mae. The harsh reality is that those who speak up about unethical conduct are often ignored, or worse, retaliated against, Mayer said.

Given the risks associated with blowing the whistle, when an employee witnesses unethical behavior will he or she report it?

Mayer and his co-authors conducted three studies. In the first, they collected data from in a for-profit, multinational company headquartered in the United States. They surveyed employees about whether their boss and co-workers were ethical, as well as the likelihood they would speak up if they witnessed wrongdoing.

If either the employees' supervisor or co-workers were rated as being low on ethicality, employees were significantly less likely to report. Employees needed to believe that both their supervisor and co-workers were ethical in order to be more likely to say they would report unethical behavior.

"There are two primary reasons that people failed to speak up," Mayer said. "One is a feeling of futility and the other is a fear of whether being fired, demoted or ostracized. You can be retaliated against by your boss or your peers so there is a big risk in speaking up."

Because it is so difficult to speak up, society rewards those who do, such as Sherron Watkins (Enron), Coleen Rowley (FBI) and Cynthia Cooper (WorldCom)—whistleblowers who were on the cover of Time's Person of the Year issue in 2002.

The second study explored a sample of individuals who had witnessed behavior that violated their company's code of ethical conduct and either had or had not reported that misconduct to management. Many of these transgressions were serious, such as sexual harassment, giving or accepting bribes or kickbacks, falsifying financial records, and discrimination.

Looking at data from more than 30,000 employees in 16 manufacturing and technology firms, the study found that about 20 percent, or 6,000 employees, said they witnessed behavior that violated their company's code of ethical conduct. Half of those employees reported the behavior to management.

Interestingly, if either an employee's supervisor or co-workers were rated as low on ethicality, 40 percent reported the unethical behavior. However, when both the employee's supervisor and co-workers were rated as being highly ethical, 65 percent of employees reported the .

In the third study, participants were told that they would work on a task virtually with four other individuals—three co-workers and a supervisor—who sent participants pre-programmed messages.

They were asked to evaluate whether a company should go into a new market and were not allowed to use any outside materials. Participants received one of two messages from their supervisor: either that they should make sure not to break any rules or one telling them to do the job well.

Part way through the project, one of the "co-workers" sent an instant message saying he used the Internet to help the team, which was in clear violation of the rules. The other co-workers' responses, either for or against the conduct, were sent out via instant message.

Participants were later asked if any issues came up. Nearly half, or 47 percent, of participants reported the . The results from this study were almost identical to the second study.

The findings suggest that although the ethicality of one's supervisor matters, co-workers must model the same ethical behavior if we want employees who witness unethical conduct to report it to management, Mayer said.

"We are social animals and we pay attention to what others do—especially when engaging in a risky behavior like whistle-blowing at work," he said.

Explore further: Insider trading study shows stronger enforcement

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Coping with abuse in the work place

Jan 04, 2012

Confronting an abusive boss is easier said than done: employees coping with the stress of abusive treatment prefer to avoid direct communication even though it would be the most effective tactic in terms of emotional well-being. ...

Why employees do bad things for companies they love

Jan 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Employees who love their company and hustle to please their bosses sound like a recipe for success. But two recent studies co-authored by a BYU business professor found that those two factors ...

In certain jobs supervisor support can reduce absenteeism

Mar 20, 2012

A supportive supervisor can keep employees in certain hazardous jobs from being absent even when co-workers think it's all right to miss work, according to new research published by the American Psychological Association.

Recommended for you

Insider trading study shows stronger enforcement

Oct 23, 2014

The first major study of the enforcement of Australia's insider trading laws has shown the number of insider trading cases brought by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) is increasing, ...

The unexpected benefits of adjustable rate mortgages

Oct 22, 2014

Using loan level data matched to consumer credit records, researchers have been able to determine that a reduction in mortgage payments of as little as $150 a month spurred a reduction in mortgage defaults and an increase ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

geokstr
2 / 5 (5) Apr 30, 2013
You know, they told me if I voted for Romney the government would be intimidating whistleblowers, which is against the law, in order to keep inconvenient news from getting out. And it's happening, just as predicted.

Oh, wait...

It's the Obama administration that has been re-assigning, firing, and otherwise threatening whistleblowers in the Fast & Furious gunrunning debacle, which so far has cost hundreds of lives, in the Bengahzi fiasco, where they're even forbidding whistleblowers from getting outside lawyers, and many other scandals that they would have been calling for BusHitler's impeachment over.

Vendy(A,B,C,D,E...whatever) will be here in 3...2...1 to tell us all how, despite how it looks bad for Obama, it's actually the evil Republicans who are doing this, or Palin or something, and will call me a tard before demanding the beheading of the hundreds of millions who disagree with him.
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (2) May 01, 2013
You know, they told me if I voted for Romney the government would be intimidating whistleblowers, which is against the law, in order to keep inconvenient news from getting out. And it's happening, just as predicted.

Oh, wait...

It's the Obama administration that has been re-assigning, firing, and otherwise threatening whistleblowers in the Fast & Furious gunrunning debacle, which so far has cost hundreds of lives, in the Bengahzi fiasco, where they're even forbidding whistleblowers from getting outside lawyers, and many other scandals that they would have been calling for BusHitler's impeachment over.
Well that's not true.