Evaluating the seismic risk of mineral carbon sequestration

Mar 15, 2013

Geologic carbon sequestration, in which carbon is captured and stored underground, has been proposed as one way to mitigate the climatic effects of carbon dioxide emissions. One method of geologic carbon sequestration is to inject carbon dioxide in aqueous solution into rocks. However, as the solution fills the pore space in the rocks, the fluid pressure on the rocks increases, potentially increasing the risk of earthquakes.

Another option would be to inject carbon dioxide solutions into mafic rocks; the in these rocks react with the carbon dioxide, leaving solid carbonate reaction products, which decrease the amount of pore fluid.

To determine how mineral carbonation reactions affect seismic risk, Yarushina and Bercovici created a simple model to see how these reactions influence stress on the rock during and after carbon dioxide injection. Their model shows that the chemical reactions reduce fluid pore pressure and distribute stress on the minerals over a larger area.

They conclude that mineral carbonation in mafic rock could minimize the seismic risk of by underground injection as long as fluid pumping rates do not exceed a critical value.

Explore further: Separate studies suggest current "pause" in global warming likely the last

More information: Mineral carbon sequestration and induced seismicity, Geophysical Research Letters, doi:10.1002/grl.50196, 2013 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50196/abstract

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

One tough microscope

Jun 03, 2011

When it comes to seeing how carbon dioxide behaves in a geologic storehouse, most instruments can't take the pressure. But, a new apparatus created by scientists at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Wright ...

Storing carbon dioxide deep underground in rock form

Jun 17, 2010

As carbon dioxide continues to burgeon in the atmosphere causing the Earth's climate to warm, scientists are trying to find ways to remove the excess gas from the atmosphere and store it where it can cause no trouble.

Recommended for you

New satellite maps out Napa Valley earthquake

1 hour ago

Scientists have used a new Earth-observation satellite called Sentinel-1A to map the ground movements caused by the earthquake that shook up California's wine-producing Napa Valley on 24 August 2014.

Rainfall monitoring with mobile phones

1 hour ago

Agriculture, water resource management, drought and flood warnings, etc.: rainfall monitoring is vital in many areas. But the observation networks remain insufficient. This is not the case for antennas for ...

Seismic hazards reassessed in the Andes

1 hour ago

Although being able to predict the date on which the next big earthquake will occur is still some way off becoming a reality, it is now possible to identify the areas where they will occur. IRD researchers ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

praos
1.8 / 5 (4) Mar 15, 2013
A dead technology walking. And all this nonsense just to block the obvious solution: the nuclear option.
Graeme
not rated yet Mar 20, 2013
What is proposed here is a form of underground pollution. Causing increased damage to the rocks beneath. I was hoping that liquid carbon dioxide (under pressure) would be denser than water and so could push its way down under its own pressure and weight through water. But this is only the case when the temperature is below -20, which will have its own problems freezing the surrounding damp rock instead of pushing out the water.