Obama says US must shift cars, trucks off oil (Update 2)

Mar 15, 2013 by Associated Press
Members of the audience cheer as President Barack Obama speaks at Argonne National Laboratory in Argonne, Ill., Friday, March 15, 2013. Obama traveled to the Chicago area to deliver a speech to promote his energy policies. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama on Friday spoke of future cars that can go "coast to coast without using a drop of oil" and urged Congress to authorize spending $2 billion over the next decade to expand research into electric cars and biofuels to wean automobiles off gasoline.

Obama said the United States must shift its cars and trucks entirely off oil to avoid perpetual fluctuations in gas prices. Citing policies that already require automakers to increase gas mileage, he said he expects that by the middle of the next decade, Americans will only have to fill up their cars half as often.

"The only way to break this cycle of spiking gas prices—the only way to break that cycle for good—is to shift our cars entirely, our cars and trucks, off oil," the president said, speaking at Argonne National Laboratory.

The White House says energy is one of Obama's top agenda items for his second term. That focus, however, has been overshadowed as the administration and Congress work on an immigration overhaul, gun legislation and deficit-reduction measures.

Obama also cast his proposal as one meant to create opportunities for economic growth.

"I want the next great job-creating breakthroughs, whether it's in energy or nanotechnology or bio-engineering, I want those breakthroughs to be right here in the United States of America," he said.

President Barack Obama, followed by Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill. ], walks down the steps of Air Force One upon their arrival at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago, Friday, March 15, 2013, before going to Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne is the first US science and engineering research national laboratory, and it remains on of the nation's largest. (AP Photo/Paul Beaty)

His initiative, proposing to spend $200 million a year on research, would be paid for with revenue from federal oil and gas leases on offshore drilling, and the White House said it would not add to the deficit.

The money would fund research on "breakthrough" technologies such as batteries for electric cars and biofuels made from switch grass or other materials. Researchers also would look to improve use of natural gas as a fuel for cars and trucks.

Obama's motorcade passed a couple dozen protesters against the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport oil from Canada's tar sands to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. The Obama administration is considering whether to clear the project.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters aboard Air Force one that "there's no question" that the types of green energy initiatives the president was talking about would have more impact on climate change than whether Keystone is built.

Obama's proposal is modeled after a plan submitted by a group of business executives and former military leaders who are committed to reducing U.S. oil dependence. The group, called Securing America's Future Energy, or SAFE, is headed by FedEx Corp. Chairman and CEO Frederick W. Smith and retired Marine Corps Gen. P.X. Kelley.

Creation of the trust would require congressional approval at a time of partisan divide over energy issues. Republicans have pushed to expand oil and gas drilling on federal land and water, while Obama and many Democrats have worked to boost renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power.

White House officials said the president's proposal would not require expansion of drilling to federal lands or water where it is now prohibited. Instead, they are counting on increased production from existing sites, along with efficiencies from an administration plan to streamline drilling permits. The government collects more than $6 billion a year in royalties from production on federal lands and waters.

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner said Obama needs to expand drilling to get his support.

"For this proposal to even be plausible, oil and gas leasing on federal land would need to increase dramatically," the spokesman, Brendan Buck, said. "Unfortunately, this administration has consistently slowed, delayed and blocked American energy production."

Obama's push for the energy trust came as the Environmental Protection Agency released a report Friday indicating that fuel economy standards rose last year by 1.4 miles per gallon (3.7 liters), the largest annual increase since EPA started keeping track. The agency said the improvement was due to better availability of high-performing cars and more options for consumers.

A spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers said the group supports efforts to make diverse fuels more available but said improved transportation infrastructure, such as additional charging stations for electric cars and greater availability of clean diesel fuel, also is needed.

Explore further: Next-generation nuclear reactors that use radioactive waste materials as fuel

4.5 /5 (12 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Obama calls for investment in clean energy

Mar 10, 2012

US President Barack Obama called on Congress Saturday to invest more money in clean energy technologies and end multi-billion-dollar subsidies given each year to oil companies.

Obama says cleaner energy will help job creation

Apr 02, 2011

US President Barack Obama said Saturday that a transition to cleaner energy will help create more American jobs as he promoted his new initiative designed to reduce US energy imports by a third.

U.S. attacks problem of 'produced water'

Jun 20, 2007

The U.S. Department of Energy has designed a Web program to help oil and natural gas companies solve the environmental challenge of produced water.

New US offshore oil leasing plan includes Arctic

Nov 08, 2011

The Obama administration on Tuesday proposed a new plan for offshore oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Alaska, including the environmentally sensitive Arctic.

Obama, Clinton to announce energy saving program

Dec 02, 2011

(AP) -- Enlisting former President Bill Clinton as a partner, President Barack Obama is announcing a $4 billion effort to increase the energy efficiency of government and private sector buildings, aiming for fuel savings ...

Recommended for you

Seoul to provide smartphone-charging down by the stream

49 minutes ago

Seoul's mobile users will be able to make use of outdoor charging stations at a popular downtown stream, powered by mini-hydroelectric turbines that use the stream's current. The city is building the recharging ...

Tesla, Chinese firm plan 400 charging stations

2 hours ago

Tesla Motors Co. and a state-owned Chinese phone carrier announced plans Friday to build 400 charging stations for electric cars in a new bid to promote popular adoption of the technology in China.

Cool roofs in China can save energy and reduce emissions

22 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Working with Chinese researchers, the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) has conducted the first comprehensive study of cool roofs in China and concluded ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3432682
1.6 / 5 (7) Mar 15, 2013
Compressed natural gas is the simple, obvious solution. The commodity market bulk price today is 3.91 per million btu, or 49 cent per gasoline gallon equivalent (gge). Piped to the home, it would cost about $1.25/gge. Gasoline's wholesale pretax price is $3.16 per gallon. CNG works very smoothly in cars and light trucks, and even in diesels, mixed into the intake air to cut the amount of diesel needed per mile in half. What are we waiting for?
dschlink
1 / 5 (1) Mar 15, 2013
CNG vehicles don't have much more range than electric ones. Granted you can fill the tanks much faster than you can charge a battery, but there are only a few thousand CNG fueling stations vs 200,000 gasoline outlets and millions of electrical ones.
antialias_physorg
1 / 5 (1) Mar 15, 2013
Caught this article yesterday about a vastly simplified design for a range extender for electric vehicles.
http://www.dlr.de...ear-all/

Simple, elegant, and could be implemented in no time.
kochevnik
1 / 5 (4) Mar 15, 2013
Range extension wouldn't be needed in the city if an induction charging coil was placed in parking spaces. In some cities they already have a parking mafia. the least they could do is give your car some energy while you pay $10 for the meter. Shoppers will prefer stores with charging coils over the barren, hot treeless lots so popular in corporatist USA. Those lots are a perfect place for overhead solar collectors should there be a forward-looking company to order them. Several companies make solar trees for parking lots
Eikka
1 / 5 (4) Mar 15, 2013
CNG vehicles don't have much more range than electric ones.


LNG cars do. At least double compared to compressed gas, and they operate at lower pressures and the tanks are lighter in construction.

And, if you can synthesize propane out of natural gas, you get something with an energy density approaching gasoline, that stays liquid at reasonable pressures at room temperature. A kilogram of LPG is worth about a liter of gasoline in an engine.

but there are only a few thousand CNG fueling stations vs 200,000 gasoline outlets and millions of electrical ones.


There are only a handful of places in the US where you can recharge an electric vehicle fast enough to be comparable.

It's much easier and cheaper to convert existing gasoline stations to CNG/LNG/LPG than set up a electric fast charging network and deal with the strain it would put on the local electric grids.
packrat
2 / 5 (8) Mar 15, 2013
There is going to be a lot of people switching over to cng and lpg as more and more alcohol is mixed with regular gas. It's damaging cars and just about anything with a small engine. I converted my recumbent trike that has a small 2hp assist engine over to propane last year due to the fact I was having to buy a new carb about every 3 months because the alcohol was eating the rubber and plastic parts inside the carbs. The engine now runs better than it ever did on gasohol and the oil in it stays clean.
Huns
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 15, 2013
Natural gas extraction sometimes causes groundwater contamination. Solar power has almost zero ongoing maintenance cost and contaminates nothing. We should be focusing on that, and fusion.
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (4) Mar 15, 2013
CNG vehicles don't have much more range than electric ones. Granted you can fill the tanks much faster than you can charge a battery, but there are only a few thousand CNG fueling stations vs 200,000 gasoline outlets and millions of electrical ones.
Right. And why pay for a whole new infrastructure when NG can be converted to gas, diesel, and jet fuel cheaply?
http://en.wikiped..._liquids

CNG and LNG tanks explode in accidents by the way.