Jekyll and Hyde corals tell different warming story

Mar 26, 2013
Jekyll and Hyde corals tell different warming story

(Phys.org) —Like the rings of a tree trunk, Strontium-to-calcium ratios (Sr/Ca) in coral skeletons have been widely used to determine past ocean temperatures from yearly banded corals. However, scientists have now found that biological (growth) effects can overpower the climate information locked in the coral skeletons.

An international group of researchers, led by Assistant Professor Jens Zinke from The University of Western Australia's Oceans Institute and the School of Earth and Environment, and Australian Institute of Marine Science, studied two corals of the same species just 720 metres apart near northeast Madagascar.

Taking a detailed look at how Sr/Ca varies with temperature and with biological factors, the group compared cores from the corals and examined the Sr/Ca ratios and growth rates over a 43-year period, along with historical data for the region, looking at seasonal and interannual variability as well as longer term trends.

The results show that part of the variation in Sr/Ca ratios is accounted for by the individual coral's growth rather than temperature.

"Both cores showed similar seasonal variations in growth rate and Sr/Ca ratios, but on interannual time scales, the two corals growth rates had opposite responses to temperature: In one core, increasing sea surface temperature was accompanied by increasing growth rate and increasing Sr/Ca, while in the other, over the same period the rising temperatures led to declining growth rate and declining Sr/Ca," Dr Zinke said.

The conclusion drawn by the study, "Confounding effects of and high SST variability on skeletal Sr/Ca: implications for coral paleothermometry", published as an American Geophysical Union (AGU) "Research Spotlight" is that scientists need to consider analysing multiple coral cores when attempting to use Sr/Ca ratios as a proxy for past ocean temperature.

Explore further: Researchers provide guide to household water conservation

More information: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journa… /%28ISSN%292324-9250

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Carbonate veins reveal chemistry of ancient seawater

Feb 05, 2010

The chemical composition of our oceans is not constant but has varied significantly over geological time. In a study published this week in Science, researchers describe a novel method for reconstructing past o ...

Scientist creates new hypothesis on ocean acidification

Aug 30, 2011

A Researcher at the Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, an organized research unit in the University of Hawai'i at Manoa's School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology has come up with a new explanation for the effects ...

Heat and cold damage corals in their own ways, study shows

Feb 02, 2012

Around the world coral reefs are facing threats brought by climate change and dramatic shifts in sea temperatures. While ocean warming has been the primary focus for scientists and ocean policy managers, cold events can also ...

Recommended for you

New water balance calculation for the Dead Sea

4 hours ago

The drinking water resources on the eastern, Jordanian side of the Dead Sea could decline severe as a result of climate change than those on the western, Israeli and Palestinian side. This is the conclusion ...

Studying wetlands as a producer of greenhouse gases

9 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Wetlands are well known for their beneficial role in the environment. But UConn Honors student Emily McInerney '15 (CAHNR) is studying a less widely known role of wetlands – as a major producer ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ScooterG
1.8 / 5 (5) Mar 26, 2013
So data gathered in the past was not necessarily accurate. Now tell us how many subsequent studies were based on this inaccurate data?

Studies built on faulty data are faulty studies and have no place in real science.

And people wonder why climate science is denied???
Maggnus
3.3 / 5 (3) Mar 26, 2013
Now tell us how many subsequent studies were based on this inaccurate data?


Sure. None.
ScooterG
2.5 / 5 (4) Mar 26, 2013
Now tell us how many subsequent studies were based on this inaccurate data?


Sure. None.


I'll bet it never factored in to "consensus" either.
Maggnus
3 / 5 (2) Mar 26, 2013
I'll bet it never factored in to "consensus" either.


Nope, it didn't.
maowcat
2.6 / 5 (5) Mar 26, 2013
So data gathered in the past was not necessarily accurate. Now tell us how many subsequent studies were based on this inaccurate data?

Studies built on faulty data are faulty studies and have no place in real science.

And people wonder why climate science is denied???


Why do you waste your time making these pointless and idiotic statements?