EU fish discard ban poses many questions

Mar 24, 2013 by Bryan Mcmanus
Chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall (left) and Britain's Prince Charles outside Selfridges department store in London on May 11, 2011 launching an initiative to raise awareness of over-fishing. The sight of valuable fish being thrown back into the sea, mostly to die, has driven calls for a discard ban by celebrity chefs and environmentalists.

The sight of valuable fish being thrown back into the sea, mostly to die, has been a public relations headache for the fishing industry and driven calls for a discard ban by celebrity chefs and environmentalists.

European fishing boats have long discarded before entering port to ensure they meet quotas, by some estimates up to a quarter of their catch, in a wasteful practice that damages the stocks the limits were meant to protect.

A simple ban, as agreed by the EU last month, would seem the obvious answer but implementation is fraught, with fishermen wanting help to meet the extra costs while green groups say exemptions make it near unworkable.

After the last month voted through a complete ban from next year, current EU chair Ireland thrashed out an accord based on the principle that in future all fish caught must be landed.

So far so good—but if there are no discards, that means more fish on the dockside and a host of new problems on quotas, and catch and fisheries management.

Major powers Spain and France sought leeway to set one fish species quota against another, or to swap entitlements between boats, fisheries or even other countries.

Most important, they won exemptions to the discard ban.

In the first two years of the new policy, which Ireland hopes to finalise with the Parliament and EU leaders by June, fishermen will have the right to discard up to 9.0 percent of their catch, falling to 8.0 percent for the next two years and then finally to 7.0 percent.

Environmentalists say these provisions undermine the proposal.

Fishermans sew nets next to boats anchored at the fishing port of Barbate, southern Spain, on January 9, 2012. The sight of valuable fish being thrown back into the sea, mostly to die, has been a public relations headache for the fishing industry and driven calls for a discard ban by celebrity chefs and environmentalists.

"All the exemptions make it very difficult to guarantee that they are implementing the discard ban," said Javier Lopez of the Oceana group. "This is our concern—it is an improvement but it is very difficult to control."

Saskia Richartz, EU fisheries policy director, said that if there were a total discard ban, then "if someone throws something overboard, then clearly they are doing something illegal," making it easier to police.

The discard exemptions mean "it is not a ban, it is a restriction," Richartz said.

In contrast, fishermen's groups, having previously attacked the "simplistic and populist approach of a total ban," welcomed the accord.

Europeche and Copa-Cogeca noted "the important step" taken with "the establishment of a gradual timetable for the progressive implementation of a discard ban and the introduction of management tools to help the adapt to the obligation to land all catches."

But "there are still many outstanding issues to be resolved," they said in a joint statement, "particularly for the practical implementation of a discard ban ... and its consequences."

It was essential, they added, that the authorities "minimise the socio-economic impact of a discard ban on fishing communities by accompanying targeted measures and investments" to help them adjust to the new regime.

An EU source said it was "clear that a zero ban would not be practicable or possible to implement so there has to be some way of allowing for that, particularly if you want to secure" industry support.

Lopez said he understood the problems the fishermen face but "their main concern is the cost ... who is going to pay" for the extra work involved in handling the larger catches, or adapting fishing gear to reduce the problem.

A discard ban is important "not because it means less fish are killed but because the economic cost ... will incentivise fishermen" to minimise the bycatch, Richartz said.

The discard ban is a small but headline-grabbing part of a wider overhaul of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy which is intended to put the industry on a sustainable basis after years of overfishing.

In this respect, Parliament's approach is simpler—it will mean more fish in the sea from the start and so help stocks recover faster, while the Irish-negotiated accord means less, Richartz said.

For example, quota flexibility means that one year may take 10 percent over the agreed limit. The following year, that species is being fished again but from 10 percent below what it should be to make up for what has already been taken, she argued.

"We are always borrowing against the future," Richartz said. "You have less and less reproducing stock so that we end up in a downward spiral."

Explore further: Dwindling wind may tip predator-prey balance

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

EU ministers reach deal on fish discards ban

Feb 27, 2013

EU fishery ministers agreed Wednesday to implement a ban on discards—the wasteful practice of dumping unwanted fish overboard—by easing quota limits, much to the anger of environmental groups.

EU fish discard ban agreed -- for 2019

Jun 13, 2012

After 20 hours of talks into the early hours Wednesday, Europe's fisheries ministers finally struck a compromise deal to save the oceans from overfishing -- but failed to satisfy environmentalists.

Disputed fish quota cuts lead to tough EU talks

Dec 18, 2012

EU fishery ministers began difficult talks Tuesday on the vexed question of 2013 quotas as they sought to balance conflicting demands from environmentalists and fishermen alike.

MEPs approve new EU sustainable fishery regime

Feb 06, 2013

The European Parliament approved Wednesday a new fisheries accord hailed by environmental groups as a breakthrough in managing a key food resource which has been over-exploited for years.

Recommended for you

Dwindling wind may tip predator-prey balance

6 hours ago

Bent and tossed by the wind, a field of soybean plants presents a challenge for an Asian lady beetle on the hunt for aphids. But what if the air—and the soybeans—were still?

Asian stars enlisted to fight African rhino poaching

16 hours ago

Increasingly desperate South African conversationists are turning to a multi-national team of "rhino ambassadors" to try to end the scourge of poaching—and Vietnamese pop diva Hong Nhung has been recruited ...

Tropical fish a threat to Mediterranean Sea ecosystems

Sep 18, 2014

The tropical rabbitfish which have devastated algal forests in the eastern Mediterranean Sea pose a major threat to the entire Mediterranean basin if their distribution continues to expand as the climate ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lurker2358
3 / 5 (2) Mar 24, 2013
I bet none of the idiots who are trying to ban discarding fish has ever set foot on a fishing boat, or for that matter run their own fishing lines.

First you're going to say they can't have over a certain amount, then you're going to say they can't throw fish back if they accidentally pull in too many (or the wrong size maybe). Wow. So you're looking for an excuse to fine or ticket the fisherman no matter what they do.