Architect looks to remake suburbs and other neighborhoods with 'more intelligent' designs

Mar 29, 2013 by Peter Dizikes
Alexander D’Hooghe, and associate professor of architecture and director of the Center for Advanced Urbanism at MIT. Photo: M. Scott Brauer

For many people, suburbs have a bad reputation: too bland, too boring. Alexander D'Hooghe would like to change that perception.

D'Hooghe, a Belgian-born architect and director of the Center for Advanced Urbanism at MIT, cares deeply about urban form and the large-scale issues cities face in achieving more efficient , better transportation and less congestion. One of his main concerns is better integrating suburbs with the larger in which they exist.

"The future of our cities is in the gradual of our suburbs," D'Hooghe says. After all, he thinks, not all suburbs have to take the form of sprawling tracts: "We need to do some myth-busting about that." Instead, D'Hooghe believes, suburban areas can have better-designed public and commercial spaces, and better transit hubs, if we're willing to make a few changes to them.

For instance, take the big box, that often-loathed architectural form housing large stores. That is precisely the kind of form that D'Hooghe would like to reinvent, to take advantage of its low-cost elements while providing new and better functionality for people.

"The big box is ugly," D'Hooghe says. "But it's also inexpensive, generous and flexible." That's why, he adds, "If we can make the big box more intelligent, it may be the future of the suburbs."

To see what D'Hooghe has in mind, consider one of his designs, in the town of Asse, Belgium, where construction started last fall on one of his variations on the big box. In this case, it is a modernist structure with a wing that incorporates a police station, fire station and youth center. By linking those facilities in one building, D'Hooghe saved room for a large community park next to the building.

Meanwhile, in the Anderlecht district of Brussels, another D'Hooghe project will soon start construction. A public plaza surrounded by urban versions of big boxes is under development, replacing a slaughterhouse; D'Hooghe's design studio developed a mixed-use commercial structure, now being built, with flexible spaces that can be adapted to multiple types of use over time.

"It should serve many audiences," D'Hooghe says of the structure, noting that flexibly designed buildings can save large chunks of energy over time, compared to replacing older buildings more often.

Drawing over music

D'Hooghe grew up in Brussels as part of a well-known musical family; his father was a professional classical musician. He considered making music his own career, but decided to strike off on his own and take up architecture instead. D'Hooghe graduated as a civil engineer and architect from the University of Leuven, in Belgium, then received a master's degree in urban design at Harvard University's Graduate School of Design in 2001. D'Hooghe received his PhD in architecture from the Berlage Institute in Rotterdam, Netherlands, in 2007.

Among the designers D'Hooghe studied with and praises are Rem Koolhaas, the prominent Dutch architect who teaches at Harvard; Wiel Arets, the new dean of architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology; and Marcel Smets, an urbanist in Belgium. And while many of his intellectual concerns now revolve around planning issues, he still regards himself as a design-oriented architect.

"One of the biggest things I care about is making drawings," he says.

He set up his own practice, the Organization for Permanent Modernity, which has offices in Boston and Brussels, in 2003, and joined MIT in 2005. Last year, D'Hooghe was granted tenure at MIT, and became the founding director of MIT's Center for Advanced Urbanism (CAU), which has an ambitious agenda meant to establish links between architects and planners, while applying systems thinking to cities.

Into the infrastructure

Indeed, CAU, which has more than 20 affiliated MIT faculty, is holding a large conference on cities, "Infrastructural Monument," on April 8 and 9 at MIT's Media Lab.

D'Hooghe describes transit infrastructure as another significant priority, in addition to—and related to—his interest in suburban design. For instance, he suggests, suburbs could make better use of intermodal transit hubs—linking road, bus, rail or bicycle—in building smart links within metropolitan areas, and could place more business activity at such hubs, reducing commutes and travel while helping suburban areas revolve around such nodes.

"Infrastructure is not really about infrastructure, it's about how we live," D'Hooghe says. At the moment, he says, in the United States, "we're living on the worn-out threads of an Eisenhowerian regime," referring to the interstate highways built since the 1950s. "Our existing infrastructure is at the end of its lifetime."

The nature of such work is interdisciplinary, D'Hooghe recognizes, and means linking design with an urban-planning framework. That approach will also be necessary to help cities ward off the effects of natural disasters, adds D'Hooghe, who has produced designs for artificial islands along the Belgian coastline as a barrier against storms.

"If we can build large-scale design as a field, then I will be happy," D'Hooghe says.

Still, he acknowledges that his aims will not be easy to achieve. Transforming suburbs, he notes, "requires a will for density" that not everyone has, even if it makes environmental sense. Still, he hopes that his own designs can make an impact on people's views, including his own rethinking of the big box.

"A building like that can be proud," D'Hooghe says. "It doesn't have to be ashamed of itself."

Explore further: Best of Last Week – Detecting dark matter with GPS, a gel that stops bleeding and the benefits of fasting

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

A design to save American cities

May 29, 2012

When Brent Ryan started doing academic research on Detroit, in the 1990s, he was immediately taken aback by the city’s plight: derelict commercial buildings, burnt-out homes and whole neighborhoods being ...

Recommended for you

James Watson's Nobel Prize to be auctioned

10 hours ago

Missed the chance to bid on Francis Crick's Nobel Prize when it was auctioned off last year for $2.27 million? No worries, you'll have another chance to own a piece of science history on Dec. 4, when James D. Watson's 1962 ...

Engineers develop gift guide for parents

Nov 21, 2014

Faculty and staff in Purdue University's College of Engineering have come up with a holiday gift guide that can help engage children in engineering concepts.

Former Brown dean whose group won Nobel Prize dies

Nov 20, 2014

David Greer, a doctor who co-founded a group that won the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize for working to prevent nuclear war and who helped transform the medical school at Brown University, has died. He was 89.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lurker2358
3 / 5 (2) Mar 29, 2013
Still, he acknowledges that his aims will not be easy to achieve. Transforming suburbs, he notes, "requires a will for density" that not everyone has, even if it makes environmental sense.


The wrong type of density produces more problems tan good.

An idealist view would somehow integrate electrical transportation into the civilization at all levels, including street level induction coils for electric vehicles, and perhaps sky rails between buildings. this won't realistically happen in more than one or two locations though, because it basically requires building a city from scratch.

Anyway, if you put lots of people in one place, then you have issues of how to get food and water to them, and how to get sewage away from the city, without making everyone else's life...shitty...

Seriously, big cities already dump their shit directly into the ocean, right near a beach where people swim. It's sickening.
Lurker2358
1 / 5 (1) Mar 29, 2013
Arcology doesn't work in capitalism because nobody wants to live at their work place. Employers already have too much control over employee's lives. If people lived adjacent to their work place, or even in the very building where they work, the employers would as well own them.

Slavery will never die as long as 20% own 80% of everything, and unfortunately, Arcology in a capitalistic model would end up having 10% owning 95% and everyone else "renting".
alfie_null
not rated yet Mar 30, 2013
Anyway, if you put lots of people in one place, then you have issues of how to get food and water to them, and how to get sewage away from the city, without making everyone else's life...shitty...

Same issues for people living in suburbs. But to a greater degree. Per capita, utilities need more wire, more pipe. You need more stores. Distribution to those stores uses more resources. You need more effluent processing facilities. People need to travel more, which means more resources have to be spent on transportation.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.