Alaska legislator claims 1 in 10 darted polar bears dies

Mar 26, 2013 by Richard Mauer

On March 1, in response to Alaska losing its appeal of the threatened-species designation for polar bears, state Rep. Eric Feige said the federal government itself was responsible for the deaths of many bears.

"If the polar bear are so threatened, then why do we kill 10 percent of the ones we dart and tag for scientific and management purposes?" Feige said in prepared statement issued by the Alaska House majority press office.

He provided no source for his startling assertion.

In fact, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service says, two polar bears have been killed in the Alaska Arctic since 2003 as a result of its research program. About 1,220 were darted.

That works out to one-sixteenth of 1 percent, or one-sixtieth of Feige's number.

Feige, R-Chickaloon, the co-chairman of the House Resources Committee, traveled to Washington, D.C., on state business the week after issuing the statement and didn't return calls seeking an explanation. But on Friday, his turn came up to attend the weekly news conference of the Republican majority caucus in the House.

"It comes from personal experience," Feige said of his source. "Not direct personal experience, but I spend a lot of time flying around the state and I happen to know the guy that flies the Super Cub that does the polar surveys along the coast," he said.

"The helicopter pilots are based out of Deadhorse and - lately it's been R44s (a lightweight utility helicopter), couple of them, they have inflatable floats to get around and land on, occasionally the bears come into Deadhorse and chew on the floats and that causes great headaches for the pilots. It was conversations with those people, folks actually doing the surveys, that told me 10 percent died."

"They dart the bear, anesthetize the bear, and in the process of doing that, 10 percent are fatal," Feige said. "I talked to the person doing the work and that's what they told me."

Bruce Woods, spokesman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Anchorage, said that about 100 bears a year have been darted in the southern Beaufort Sea area since 2003, or about 1,000 bears. Another 220 were darted in the Chukchi Sea region.

One of those bears drowned in 2005, he said. One other was accidentally asphyxiated in a sling in 2009. Both fatalities occurred in the southern Beaufort region. There were no other deaths, Woods said.

"Since the late 1990s we've been using Telazol when darting bears, which has proven to be far more effective and safe for the animals than drugs used previously," Woods said in a follow-up e-mail. "The bears are darted so they can be handled/examined safely."

For the protection of both bear and researcher, the animals are tranquilized before being fitted with radio collars, Wood said.

Environmental representatives who have been fighting on behalf of polar bears said they believe the numbers.

"I would be shocked it would be anywhere near 10 percent," said Rebecca Noblin, an attorney in Anchorage with the Center for Biological Diversity, a frequent legal party for and against the government in environmental cases. "I haven't heard of any incidents in recent years where polar bears have been killed by Fish and Wildlife - and we would hear if that happened. They'd have to report it."

"If this was truly happening, it would be something that many of us would've heard about already and then called into question the government's methods," said Dan Howells, Greenpeace deputy campaign director based in San Francisco. "I would find it quite surprising if that were the case."

Michael LeVine, an attorney with Oceana in Juneau, said: "It's ludicrous to think that they're killing 10 percent of the ones they're darting, and if they were, it would be a really serious problem. The agencies have to permit themselves to do those kinds of studies, so somewhere there's an internal review process. Someone would've been able to find out about it if it were true.

"I have never heard of any number that approaches the ones that the representative was talking about - and I've never heard about it with any kind of scientific testing," LeVine added.

In 2008, citing the loss of habitat due to global warming, the Interior Department listed as a threatened species. The state challenged the designation, arguing polar bear populations were healthy and that the listing could hurt economic development projects in the Arctic like off-shore oil drilling. The state lost in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2011 and lost again on appeal March 1.

Explore further: Can pollution help trees fight infection?

0 shares

Related Stories

Native groups sue over polar bear critical habitat

May 14, 2011

(AP) -- Alaska Native groups worried about losing tax revenues and royalties from oil development filed a lawsuit Friday challenging the federal government's designation of critical habitat for threatened polar bears on ...

Recommended for you

Can pollution help trees fight infection?

48 minutes ago

Trees that can tolerate soil pollution are also better at defending themselves against pests and pathogens. "It looks like the very act of tolerating chemical pollution may give trees an advantage from biological ...

Stink bugs have strong taste for ripe fruit

2 hours ago

The brown marmorated stink bug has a bad reputation. And for good reason: every summer, this pest attacks crops and invades homes, causing both sizable economic losses and a messy, smelly nuisance—especially ...

Iceland whaling season underway despite protest

4 hours ago

Icelandic whaling boats have left port to begin the 2015 whaling season, authorities said on Monday as more than 700,000 people signed a petition calling for an end to the hunt.

Study suggests there are only two tiger subspecies

10 hours ago

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with affiliations to institutions in Germany, Denmark and the U.K. has concluded after extensive research, that there are really only two subspecies of tigers, as opposed ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jsdarkdestruction
not rated yet Mar 27, 2013
He's a republican. They make up their own facts and use it to try to attack the federal government Nothing new here. Typical republican nonsense accusations while trying to help their buddies the oil tycoons.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.